4merper4mer

Asking that he not be present seems ok to me. Asking that he testify first seems unreasonable.

WTF am I missing? I gave up after 9 paragraphs of "Seniors don't study much".

Greggo is still adept at teaching talented defenders to be overly aggressive and bite on every fake to open up lanes all over the field. He's such a macho man wannabe. Compleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeete loooooooooooooooooser.

Can someone type out a sample on here because those links hurt my eyes? That requested, I think quotes and pictures from the youth of either party in this story, or their friends, is useless. They were young and young people are as stupid as Canadians.

Link?

Dang it we got the wrong John Tavares.

Gary Bird could shoot the 3.

Sad that it was child porn when it could have been just about anything..........except aliens. Sitcom math strikes again.

I'll believe anything after Reagan almost annihilated the planet by being mean to the USSR.

Thanks and it all makes sense except the bi-cameral thing. First, I don't think the Lewinsky stuff was filmed. And there haven't even been rumors about another guy being involved.

She's not running for President. You thought those videos of Hillary stumbling around were bad? Prying a sarcophagus open backstage before speeches and debates is worse.

Dude.

I think male but I'm sure it doesn't matter. Wrap your head around Feinstein hiring a Chinese chauffeur and somehow not being in on it and not figuring it out for 20 years. Is that possible? How the hell does this happen? Have you seen Chinese people driving in San Francisco?

I don't get it. But the right answer was supposed to be: A Senator's 20 year Chinese chauffeur.

What's more transparent than a server in a bathroom?

It's out of character for Feinstein to try playing both sides of something huh?

For me, there are some individual politicians I still take seriously. I agree with some and disagree with others. These are people that I read as believing in some set of principles and driving toward them. I loathe the people driving at principles I see as counter to our founding, but I take them seriously. Cruz, Bernie, Warren, Gowdy and Paul fit this category along with very few others. The vast vast majority are very clearly "in the game" to either advance themselves and/or to go around the rules to expedite their desires. Flake, Harris, Schiff, Feinstein, Gillibrand, Clintons, Graham, McConnell and so many more. Basically the swamp. There are some "tweeners" that I think flip back and forth between principles and self serving sneakiness. Schumer and Rubio jump to mind. As an overal collage, the Washington scene can only be taken seriously because it impacts lives. It is too big in scope and highly inefficient in practice.

You're a commie.

That's the delay tactic. She has a busy life and should be able to testify based on her very hectic schedule. She frees up in mid-November.

I changed it a bit and now it's a question for you.

It's all most as if neither the Republican nor the Democrats care about the Supreme Court nominee from any perspective except how it impacts them personally.

I thought you wanted all of us to be polite. And then you start calling people Nazis. It's almost as if you're a phony.

Ummmmmmm.......pardon me if I don't trust an idea from "NJ Dolphins fan".

For someone constantly advocating kindness and a genteel nature on a message board you sure seem to have a lot of excuses and admiration for what Feinstein has done here. But I've cracked the code as to why. You're a commie. Monday is going to be an absolute circus. Congrats.

Is a spy really a spy if the person being spied upon doesn't care about the spying?