4merper4mer

What's more transparent than a server in a bathroom?

It's out of character for Feinstein to try playing both sides of something huh?

For me, there are some individual politicians I still take seriously. I agree with some and disagree with others. These are people that I read as believing in some set of principles and driving toward them. I loathe the people driving at principles I see as counter to our founding, but I take them seriously. Cruz, Bernie, Warren, Gowdy and Paul fit this category along with very few others. The vast vast majority are very clearly "in the game" to either advance themselves and/or to go around the rules to expedite their desires. Flake, Harris, Schiff, Feinstein, Gillibrand, Clintons, Graham, McConnell and so many more. Basically the swamp. There are some "tweeners" that I think flip back and forth between principles and self serving sneakiness. Schumer and Rubio jump to mind. As an overal collage, the Washington scene can only be taken seriously because it impacts lives. It is too big in scope and highly inefficient in practice.

You're a commie.

That's the delay tactic. She has a busy life and should be able to testify based on her very hectic schedule. She frees up in mid-November.

I changed it a bit and now it's a question for you.

It's all most as if neither the Republican nor the Democrats care about the Supreme Court nominee from any perspective except how it impacts them personally.

I thought you wanted all of us to be polite. And then you start calling people Nazis. It's almost as if you're a phony.

Ummmmmmm.......pardon me if I don't trust an idea from "NJ Dolphins fan".

For someone constantly advocating kindness and a genteel nature on a message board you sure seem to have a lot of excuses and admiration for what Feinstein has done here. But I've cracked the code as to why. You're a commie. Monday is going to be an absolute circus. Congrats.

Is a spy really a spy if the person being spied upon doesn't care about the spying?

It also makes the actions of cretins like Spacey and Weinstein look like no big deal.

when did the Seahawks pick up Jared Lorenzen to kick?

Biggest #%**show ever.

This is why I posted earlier saying that everyone's life should be recorded and stored by the government.

Yes. Then he made you forget so he can use you for a cat toy again the next time he posts something so brilliant nobody else on the planet can understand it.

The material to which I referred is indeed posted on this board and anyone reading my post clearly is here already. The same material is available in a lot of places and originates with the FBI files.

There are lots of issues here. People on both sides of any argument sometimes lie. When a lot of time has passed, it is hard to tell what is the truth. Sometimes people's memories lie to them. They think they are remembering the truth, but they are off. This presents problems when people are nominated to highly important positions. I think we'd all agree that the best solution is an objective one. We need a way for the government to record every moment of everyone's life and store it in case that person is nominated for something. A position like Supreme Court judge is just too important to leave if to memory, whether it is the memory of an accuser, or the nominee. I say record everyone's life now.

You are incorrect or uninformed about your first and third points. There is plenty of material on this boards that refutes both. Your second point had what to do with Trump? Who attempted to hack into what voting machines specifically?

LOL. That's just what his superior mind wants your inferior mind to think. His plan is working.

Most investigations begin as the result of something. An example would be a building burning down. Was it electrical? Arson? Let's investigate. What happened here that caused the need for an investigation? What "building burned down"? Hillary lost what was supposed to be an open and fair election. If it were an open and fair election why, absent of some evidence to the contrary, would it be investigated? A surprising result is not evidence. If 1000 voting machines simultaneously broke or more people voted in a critical district than live in the district......or one of 1,000,000 other things happened, then ok. But what happened? Do you find it at all curious that people involved in the investigation had correspondence with each other before the election even took place, hinting at all of this?

Better check your mirrors dude. Who are you kidding? You worship OC and he owns you. And the rest of us.

Hey mods, can we add a reaction button that is a picture of a straight jacket? Because that Googly eye thing doesn't cut it.

All of those guys have really crappy handwriting too.

Andre Szmyt, K, Syracuse, deserves a look on name alone.