Shirley you can't be serious.
Just being alive in 2018 every single person is subjected on a daily basis to attempts at getting their information. You only need to make one mistake, sometimes not even one, and you are compromised. The people after you can be buffoonish or sophisticated but they are not the top dogs.
What level of sophistication do you think goes into trying to get at State secrets? Again, some of this is buffoonish but some is ultra sophisticated. We know that Podesta fell for one of the buffoons which exposed the domain name "clintonemail". I'd bet $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ that the domain name was well known long before the DNC hack. Couple that with the also known facts that this server was first in her house, then in a bathroom, and never encrypted, and ask yourself honestly, using your own personal experience, if the statement that there was no evidence it had been hacked passes the smell test.
One possibility is that it had been hacked and the trail was covered up by the hackers or someone else. I suppose this is plausible if you hit your head on the pavement while descending from the turnip truck. The other is similar to believing that there was once a gigantic pot of gold sitting in the middle of Times Square, and rainbows from all across the land terminated at the top of it, but we all just walked by and didn't touch it despite all of us desiring gold more than anything else.
England, France, Germany, Russia, China, Israel, Iran, Mexican cartels, India, Pakistan, and many independent organizations all likely had a taste. If she hadn't had a private server, there would have been fewer, but not none. I get that asking the queen to follow the rules is simply unacceptable, but at least don't throw Occum's Shaver out the window.