Well I blame Gillette for toxic masculinity. As they point out in their explanation of the ad campaign, SOME of their customers are not massage artists bruts who want to keep women in the kitchen and beat up gay people. But, as they so eloquently state, SOME is not enough. Their ad campaign will educate ALL men to be truly enlightened.
This begs the question of where they have been for all this time? They have been sitting back reaping profits from this disgusting country where hair grows from men's faces and women's legs. If they and their partners on Madison Avenue would have taught us earlier about our sick society, we could have known all of this much sooner. They have also failed and continue to fail their stockholders in that they have not yet marketed male leg shaving products. Who are we to let hair grow on our legs? Shouldn't we all be more feminine? Certainly Gillette, who has marketed women's shaving products for years, could have developed a male parallel. And don't ask Gillette why women need to shave their legs. Where do you think they get the extra money to fund ad campaigns telling us all how unenlightened we are? Yes, it is selfish of men to enjoy the smooth legs of a woman, but in the long run it has benefited us all as we have had this wonderful educational ad campaign bestowed upon us.