4merper4mer

I was not enthused about S3 after watching S2. I thought it had run its course. Turns out I liked S3 a lot . They did a nice job. I'd be ok with S4 but that would have to be it. The part I found odd about the end wasn't the "American" part. They could go several ways with that and it might not even be written yet. The thing I find strange is that it was heavily implied that the Russians hadn't penetrated the upside down at all and had to move to Hawkins to do so yet they somehow had retrieved and controlled one of the monsters. That needs some splainin.

Different equations. Inaccurate interpretation of sitcom math helps you believe aliens can be real. Inaccurate interpretation of Warthog math will end that belief....and end lots of other things too. I don't think this A51 thing will happen because alien believers tend to be pot heads and pot heads tend to sleep late and forget things.

That gibberish continues to be correct every minute of every hour of every day. Your "belief" based on shifting what ifs is unhealthy.

Ok I'll be clear that I made an omission by not using the word "observable". I should have. Congrats on the gotcha moment. Edit to previous: If you understood the basics surrounding the size of the observable universe, the speed of light and time, you'd conclude that intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is a notion already refuted by logic and math. You don't, so you think aliens are possible. As I have stated in other parts of this thread, things like parallel universes cannot be dismissed. They are also unrelated except for the fact that they usually capture the interest of the same alien loons that talk about UFOs. Pro tip:. If you'd like to discuss the mathematics regarding other dimensions and/or parallel universes don't muddy the waters and soil your credibility with the absurd notion of aliens in this one.

Right there is why I always hated the Beatles.

Feel free to add "known" or "observable" in front of where I typed universe. Given that is it safe to assume you'd agree that intelligent life just simply isn't out there? Because that is what the data says.

I'm sure if you pay enough attention you can up with at least seven to eleven reasons.

Four? What part of his tweet said four? Or is that something you define? Biden is clearly a racist but B Mind won't call that out.

It really should have been an easy question to answer. What race? You haven't answered because he didn't criticize a race. He criticized an ideology. He did so in the wrong way but that doesn't make the ideology magically viable.

You'll need to ask a commie arbiter.

You use "think" and "believe" interchangably. Add their definitions to your study list.

What race is that? How many races are there?

Being completely dry while claiming to be standing in a rainstorm is delusional and hardly based on "pure fact".

A few concepts you may want to study before commenting again: 1. The size of the universe 2. The speed of light 3. Time there are more but those are the basics. You won't need to master them completely. A grasp of the high level basics will suffice.

Based on the opinions here Risto's trade value seems to be somewhere in between Gretzky and Andrew Peters.

It's even more simple than that which is the part you fail to grasp.

What race was Trump biased against in his tweet?

Wow that's way off in a lot of ways. This is the UFO/alien thread. That has been a wrap for some time now or at least should have been. This is not an exploration thread and exploration is by no means a wrap as I stated very clearly in my reply to BT.

Dude Perfect has crappy music instead of annoying banter now?

How does race play a role in any government being a complete and total catastrophe? If you think it does, you are the racist. It doesn't. There is only one letter in Trump's tweet that indicates bias. Hint: it's the letter e. That bias could be considered ideological, nationalistic or xenophobic but hardly racist if you're being truthful. The problem is those other words don't trigger enough people so the inaccurate word racist is a must. You accused me of deflection earlier but commies like you use it regularly. When they are criticized, let's talk about a progressive's race, gender, religion, sexual orientation or any other singular point of emphasis and use it to deflect. Deflect away from the fact that their ideology fails. Deflect toward the fact that every person has flaws but that those who disagree with the ideology must have their flaws pointed out and used to advance the failed ideology. Trump was certainly inarticulate and inaccurate in his tweet. He was also correct about ideologies that always fail. But by all means I suppose we should focus on how polite someone is when deciding the ideology that will define our future. Then we should let commies define what is polite. That'll work.

You are correct. The word effectively belongs where literally was placed. Sorry about that. The overall point is that more than enough data has been collected and analyzed to show that the universe is not "teeming with intelligent life" nor is it a place where intelligent life can be anything other than immeasurably scarce and highly likely to remain unknown forever if it exists at all. If it were common or even uncommon, we'd have found it in the effectively infinite data we've searched. Imagine looking for the elephant in the room and entering the door only to see four walls. What kind of clear thinking person keeps looking? How about walking outside and staying dry for a full minute yet believing you're standing in the middle of a rainstorm? That might be a better analogy. Now I'm not saying looking to the stars to understand the universe is a bad idea. We need a deeper understanding because in a few billion years Earth is toast. It is beginning to look like our progeny would need to construct an artificial haven or make huge changes elsewhere but we still need to learn much more. Every second spent looking for non-existent cousins is for entertainment purposes, a scam for funding, or a waste of science.

Commies of all races are woefully misguided or highly deceptive. The end result is always the same.

If he changed the word "countries" to "states" he could have been talking about Pelosi.

Wimbledon final gave a glimpse but overall I agree. Godspeed to Gibson.

Lol we can literally see almost back to the Big Bang. That is what our current technology has allowed.