4merper4mer

Is it almost the twelfth?

Sitcom math is the only necessary formula. It is a relatively simple equation as well. If undertaken with objectivity and with a little thought about each component it is inevitable that the solution to it is zero. It is clear that you and your pinheaded partner either have issues with objectivity, math or both. Objectivity seems to be the most likely culprit. Note that sitcom math applies only to our universe, not to other dimensions or possible parallel universes. It is clear from the formula that our universe is extremely unlikely to harbor other intelligent life. Divert to the parallel if you'd like but be aware that it makes you look foolish.

Given I don't have a formula, it can't mean much can it? I do understand the components of sitcom math and the solution to that equation. Spoiler alert: the end is "= 0"

Dude, take a step back and get a semblance of a grip. I have no equation. It is called Drake's equation and was used on a sitcom to convince morons that aliens are likely to be out there, which they are not.

Dude if it's real it bolsters sitcom math. Just take a minute, look at the formula Sheldon made famous, think using your brain instead of your emotions, and rid yourself of that nagging feeling that you're being silly.

Dude. You're lost. If it is a fake commie ploy then it does nothing either way. If it is real, it is another few gallons in the ocean of evidence that there is nothing out there. The concept isn't really hard to grasp once you let go of your wishful thinking.

Why didn't McCarthy include #nannynannywoowoo in his tweet? Pelosi can reply telling him she is rubber and he is glue.

If true and not crap made up by commies, it's further evidence of the conclusion already reached by sitcom math. Personally I'd like to know how they identify individual photons and know which ones teleport? Do they give them numbers or names? I think they should name them, but like race horses, not like people. They could have named this one "Bore's Light" because it doesn't pass the smell test and reading that article is a cure for insomnia.

No

They are having an argument over the process to determine which group is a bigger bunch of jerky-jerks. Somehow the group of lesser jerky-jerks perceives they will gain a political advantage. Meanwhile, in the real world, actual things happen while they argue over which strongly worded letter should be sent to whom. None of this charade has a basis in anyone giving a crap about the actual content of a tweet or the rhetoric from the other side that preceded it. It's all about them and their own maneuvering for power as usual. They can get bent.

They're all so hung up in their own self importance that it's scary.

Was this a verbal request? Because the other kind can now be treated cheaply with generics.

That article was one part ostentatious, one part paranoid, one part unscientific and a thousand parts irrelevant to the conversation.

I think it was dormant, not dead when Season 2 ended.

Well to be fair he did bold it.

Careful boys. @Joe in Winslow is the real expert but this broad looks like a bit chopper upper to me.

You think the press talks about inaccuracy now? Wait until he throws it out of the stadium during a game.

Where does proper comma use fit into the stupidity calculation?

The thread was a hoot. One guy nicknamed the bomber "Pyro McFolkterrorist".

Iowa

What will we all do if we don't have congress to save us from a Facebook page?

That must have been proven on Earth because there aren't any aliens to prove it anywhere else.

If you want to keep kicking cans down roads with silly sidesteps and denying reality, that is your option. There are many roads and lots of kickable cans. Eventually all of the roads lead to the same place. And there aren't any aliens or UFOs there.

Do yourself a favor. Find the sitcom math equation on line at ibelieveinmadeupcrap.com or a similar site and plug in your own numbers even if they are based on guesses. Report back and we'll move on to step two.

Its relevance to this particular discussion is unchanged by your attempted diversion unless you're suggesting that light comes to a grinding halt on a regular basis. You're not suggesting that are you?