4merper4mer

There are these things called fingerprints.

That was the song about the Kennedy assasination.

There you go.

It's sad that people spit on graves before the occupant even arrives.

It was also very obviously false and made incomprehensible leaps in logic. Q has also been called "news" and also made incomprehensible leaps in logic. You mocked one and felt the other was credible enough to entitle your thread the way you chose. Look, it's totally fine to dislike Trump and get disappointed that Katy Perry's favorite candidate lost. We should all support each other's right to choose what we choose when it comes to politics. One doesn't need to explain the reasons behind any such decision. If they do, the reasons needn't be good or logical. If I vote for Trump because I like his hair or the absurd length of his ties, that is ultimately my right even if it deserves mockery. We should also own our mistakes. In the early part of this thread you argued for pages about the word "hacking" which you were wrong about. Trump also used the word and he was also wrong. At least own that. You're a smart dude without question. It's also clear that you think others are dumb. Spoiler alert:. Lots aren't.

The original point of the thread is for a little goofy speculation and specifically asked for people who haven't been mentioned. You have mentioned Trump over and over again in other threads. It also said no one from the black book. And you mentioned the black book.

It was it the news and it was very obviously a hoax. You entitled the thread, not me or anyone else. You never supported the Trump/Russia theory? You created a thread called "Trump and Russia.". Why not "Trump and Russia?"? Why not "Russian Meddling"?

Its hard to prove long diatribes with no specifics wrong. You point that out in the Q thread often. In the above you are more than willing to accept them or at least demand proof of a negative. You chose a title for this thread. Even if the above is all true and more than a Facebook page with a Jesus v Satan epic arm wrestling throw down; why would you have chosen that title? Why not: Truman Dewey Kennedy Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Reagan Bush Clinton Bush Obama Trump and Russia?

Dude think about what you just wrote. The yellow dot and the mysteriously advanced technology. Would this technology magically erase all the previous signals emanating from their origin?

Dude I'm not asking you to read my mind. Go back a page or so and watch the Kurzweil video.

Think.

Try thinking from multiple points of view, not just one.

I know full well what the Goldilocks zone represents. I lol'ed it because it means very little and that has been proven. It's like saying you can't make a supercollider without aluminum and then saying you're almost done because you bought a roll of Reynolds wrap.

I used the word and you misunderstood or changed its meaning.

I'm not putting words in your mouth so please don't do that to me. By inconsequential I mean: never to be found never to have any impact on humanity in any way so pretty much the same as non-existent The Goldilocks zone? Shirley you can't be serious.

I've acknowledged that I left out other dimensions and that I think there is a bit of a case for parallel universes. If I were close minded, would those things be true? So I'll give you this:. At the absolute most; in a highly unlikely scenario, there could be an Earth twin,triplet or quadruplets out there, but if so they are are as inconsequential as a tree falling in the woods with no one there to hear it. It is pointless to look for such a thing and any thought about it has been proven to be a wasted thought. There is a very high likelihood that if even a very few of these actually existed, we would already know.

I'll take people who will die soon for $1000.

I swear I didn't know that. I just knew Hawking was a jerk. But I indeed broke my own rules. Neil Degrasse Tyson is just too easy. New guess: Wolfgang Puck

What many fail to grasp is that we haven't been looking for 54 years. We've been looking for all 13.8 billion. If you think about it you will understand why. He is far from my expert. Today was the first time I've ever seen or heard him. At this very moment I don't even recall his name. But his name doesn't matter. Facts matter. As long as you brought up experts I'll ask if you prefer experts on any topic to use all the facts or just the ones that point in the direction they prefer. I think everyone would prefer the universe to be teeming with life and include myself in that group. "Whoa dude, it's like really big" is so far the only thing pointing in that direction. Everything else points away.

Lol a Facebook page is interfering in our election. They also probably interfered in the Clover Vallley Idaho prom king vote on snapchat too huh? What a joke.

I left this separate from the main Epstein thread. Lots of people gave been accused or rumored to be friends of Epstein. Shirley there are others. Take a guess or two at whose name might come out some day. It can't be anyone already mentioned or anyone from his black book. I'll start: Stephen Hawking George Clooney

He pointed out three highly unusual things about Earth. These are three things out of hundreds that are highly unusual. It would seem those hundreds of very rare things make our circumstances inconcevably unusual. The utter lack of any signal whatsoever from the trillions collected from all directions and times in space corroborates his conclusion. If he is biased, he is biased by data. Others are biased by wishful thinking, misplaced spirituality, laziness or profit motive. Good luck getting them to admit that.

It had to be aliens I suppose. Here's some more math. It's basic Fermi stuff but I'm sure I just don't understand how big everything is, amirite?

It depends on what defines probable cause in that jurisdiction, but if I'm correct the involvement of a Patriot nullifies any action by the police.

Actually, it's safe to say that no other civilizations have walked that path.