I liked Joker. It was different in that there wasn't really all that much plot when it came right down to it. It was a deep dive into an individual and very well done.
Phoenix was great. I thought I'd be comparing him to Ledger but I can't really. Phoenix's Joker was about society and outside forces shaping him. Ledger's Joker was about a more evolved Joker having judged the society and manipulating it. The Joker writers did a great job. You could see Ledger's Joker arising from Phoenix's or not. They made it independent but not totally removed.
It's odd to me that a comic book villain could produce two of the better acting performances I can remember, but I thought Phoenix was great and years later the Ledger Joker still amazes me.
Lol at these buffoons. It is pretty clear and in the public record that the "investigation" into collusion was rife with overt corruption yet here we are years later with zero having been done about it. I don't need a crystal ball or FISA warrant any more than I'd need one to say the Pats might get a beneficial call from the zebras.
I'm a big fan of several of the people in it but couldn't get through the first two or three episodes. Did you find it slow to start and it got better?
I can't say he is way off but he is trolling Dallas fans. SF is good but that seems high. I thought the funniest part was him mentioning the Colts are missing Kim Jung QB. Brisset can't win. Whatever he does, the narrative will always be that it would have been more.
Illegal yes, corrupt.....really? The tickets have relatively nominal value. They probably would have gone unused.
I do question the decision to attend, but not on moral grounds. I've been to a Nationals game. Less atmosphere than the moon.