4merper4mer

The Chiefs get extra rest/prep time for the Bills because the Titans screwed up. That sounds pretty fair. It's an absolute joke and there is no justifying it.

He's a commie

Thus....no aliens

KC and Buffalo had equally short prep weeks. Not anymore. Can you really not figure that out? There is a two day difference created completely by Tennessee. It's completely unfair and a joke.

What an absolute hose job. Because Tennessee has a blatant disregard for rules, the Bills play them off a bye and get a short prep week for the Champs. Shirley they can't be serious with this crap. It's as if the Bills are being punished. Horrible horrible horrible plan.

Don't forget though he has a superhero looking over his shoulder at all times. Didn't you watch the draft?

I think so but this sure seems to be on the Titans organization. If they really violated all of the rules as been speculated I would not be shocked at all if the organization was forced to pay the Bills their game checks.

I get what you're saying in general but personally I do think it is actually bad luck to lose your job because the team doctor punctured your lung.

The Orioles?

Get bent

William Henry Harrison for getting out of the way and letting people determine their own fate. Honrable mention to Millard Fillmore because I think ducks are pretty cool.

He declassified them, he didn't make them up.

But the guy in a band who is now a steroid expert gets a big thumbs up? Lol

You know I don't think Mike Pence and Carrot Top look alike at all but that dude looks like both of them. Eddie Van Halen?

When was the last good one?

You're a real class act.

Mike Pence

Carrot top

Suck for Luck Tank for Tua Transmit for Trevor

Math still hasn't relinquished its grip on wishful thinking?

I read a different quote before I read the one you cut and paste above. I don't agree with his approach but it was clear to me he wanted to "spread the word" about TBD. To me it did not read like hacking, physical harm, doxxing or anything of the sort. It read like he wanted to get enough people off the site so it would lose revenue. He wanted more than 5 or 10. I don't think it would work but the "plan" seemed clear to me. What is unclear to me is why you seem to want to "correct" the way I've interpreted what he wrote. Why do you feel that need? I've told you I don't feel the same way as him regardless of whichever interpretation is correct.

He's at least guilty of being redundant then.

I didn't even know viruses had sheds. What do they put in there?

I didn't interpret it as physical harm when I first read it. I interpreted the "personal" as being a result of financial ramifications of site ownership and a result of some sort of boycott or similar. Although I would not participate in, advocate or encourage that, in fact I'd discourage it, I view that as his right to do. If it is harm outside the site, that is on a personal level, then I'm not sure you'd ask what I thought. Who could support that? Being honest, I read it as site related harm, which again I don't support, and I thought his explanation was pretty clear. He was saying hit him in the pocketbook which I find to be folly at best and vindictive at worst. I honestly can't see how you saw it as anything else and to me it looks like you were trying to twist his words and make something I found silly look like something sinister. Just being honest.

Says some jerk who probably has the flu.