4merper4mer

Get bent

William Henry Harrison for getting out of the way and letting people determine their own fate. Honrable mention to Millard Fillmore because I think ducks are pretty cool.

He declassified them, he didn't make them up.

But the guy in a band who is now a steroid expert gets a big thumbs up? Lol

You know I don't think Mike Pence and Carrot Top look alike at all but that dude looks like both of them. Eddie Van Halen?

When was the last good one?

You're a real class act.

Mike Pence

Carrot top

Suck for Luck Tank for Tua Transmit for Trevor

Math still hasn't relinquished its grip on wishful thinking?

I read a different quote before I read the one you cut and paste above. I don't agree with his approach but it was clear to me he wanted to "spread the word" about TBD. To me it did not read like hacking, physical harm, doxxing or anything of the sort. It read like he wanted to get enough people off the site so it would lose revenue. He wanted more than 5 or 10. I don't think it would work but the "plan" seemed clear to me. What is unclear to me is why you seem to want to "correct" the way I've interpreted what he wrote. Why do you feel that need? I've told you I don't feel the same way as him regardless of whichever interpretation is correct.

He's at least guilty of being redundant then.

I didn't even know viruses had sheds. What do they put in there?

I didn't interpret it as physical harm when I first read it. I interpreted the "personal" as being a result of financial ramifications of site ownership and a result of some sort of boycott or similar. Although I would not participate in, advocate or encourage that, in fact I'd discourage it, I view that as his right to do. If it is harm outside the site, that is on a personal level, then I'm not sure you'd ask what I thought. Who could support that? Being honest, I read it as site related harm, which again I don't support, and I thought his explanation was pretty clear. He was saying hit him in the pocketbook which I find to be folly at best and vindictive at worst. I honestly can't see how you saw it as anything else and to me it looks like you were trying to twist his words and make something I found silly look like something sinister. Just being honest.

Says some jerk who probably has the flu.

Had to look but found it. I'm curious why my opinion on that matters but whatever. Are you going to ask my opinion on why people in the UFO thread can't grasp math? Here goes: Similar to SDS' right to do whatever he chooses with this site, that poster has the right to vote with his feet. He seems to feel SDS is squelching speech here or denigrating certain viewpoints. I do understand the points he made about what SDS said but view them in a similar way that I view what SDS said about the situation here. I think he viewed SDS' comments in a spotlight rather than a floodlight. TYTT still has the right to decide though and he has the general right to share his thoughts. I'm not sure about sharing his thoughts about the site on the site.....I don't think that is what I'd do, but it's SDS' site so he'll allow what he'll allow. Personally I won't be leaving because the owner excercises his rights as the owner. Even if I left I wouldn't advocate a boycott or something else to hurt SDS. That is my choice to make for myself but not for anyone else. That is up to every individual. With DR gone and others potentially on the way out though, I can certainly see the potential to lose interest in the politics side. Without naming names, there are posters on here whose next original thought will be their first. Why would I peruse a board full of that? Why would I choose to read a thread stating all police are terrorists hell bent on killing black people if it is full of people that simply accept that ridiculous premise? I think most of my posts are on this side but in reality I'm more interested in the Bills side. I do more reading there but less posting. OTW is for fun and it usually is fun. If this board disappears, politics will leak into the main board and hurt it. It will just naturally happen. That doesn't need anyone advocating it or being against it. I think that's why PPP even became a thing. Edit:. I now see where you two are going back and forth in the other thread. I didn't see all of that before. I haven't seen it all yet I'm sure. I just saw one post before I typed the above. If TYTT is advocating "hurting" SDS by boycott and/or word on the street it's not something I'd do or advocate but TYTT can do what he wants as it is his right. I'm not a fan of posting it on the very site he wants to hurt but that is up to SDS to allow or disallow. If the "hurt" has implied anything physical or beyond the "walls" of this site I think that is out of line.

So I was probably right about the serial killer thing.

Huh?

I was just joking. Sorry if I hit a nerve somehow. That certainly won't stop Mr. Self Promotion himself from trying.

Just my take: 1. You're the boss and that's that. Nobody has the right to carte blanche or anything else. You seem interested in listening to the rest of the story so I'll proceed. 2. DR lashed out at TFR and I don't think TFR was the right recipient even though I happen to disagree with most of what he posts and don't find him particularly well informed. Unlike others I haven't noticed him being purposefully deceitful. I didn't take him for someone who would complain and find it sad that someone would feel the need to step in and complain on his behalf. 3. Friends of DR may not have called for DR to relax nor did they call for anyone on the "other side" to be banned as far as I'm aware. There are absolutely posters that have come to this forum fairly recently with nothing to offer and simply to agitate. There are at least a few of those that I have never seen post on the football board even once. I'm not naming names but one in particular is an obvious case and a search of his posting history would instantly reveal this without any shadow of a doubt. There are some others that "argue" with inane crap constantly but have been around for a while and a third group who disagree with what might be seen as substance by some and idiocy by others. DR made the mistake of lashing out at all, maybe more importantly at a poster from the third category. Personally I don't care about any of the above three categories....let them all stay...but category one has unquestionably been hounding DR for a long time and contributing nothing at all. 4. Whoever complained ....not hard to figure out IMO....to whom.....also not hard to figure out.....did so from their own point of view which ignored all the crap DR has been taking and focused on TFR, where DR was at least partially misdirecting his ire. If the complaint was about DR's response to a different poster your search would have led you to a far different conclusion. Why did this person not also complain about the people badgering DR which is undeniable? My guess is politics, which is the whole point of this board. Now there is a spotlight instead a floodlight. Within either a spotlight or a floodlight DR acted improperly to TFR. Using the floodlight there is more context. To me it should be either leave it all alone or look using the floodlight. The spotlight approach is dangerous. It lets whiny people decide what is civil and what is over the line. They inevitably view civility through the lens of their own political beliefs....everyone does to an extent. To me it is ok to be uncivil in here. It is preferable to stick to substance, politeness or poking fun than to be rude but I don't get to decide how other people act and I'm fine with that. 5. When in doubt see rule 1. Nobody is forced to be here if they don't like how things are handled. Edit:. I just saw the banned usernames thread and although I still don't want to name names, at least part of point 3 above is covered by that thread.

Butker missed a XP and then almost missed another. After each he drilled the ensuing kickoff 75 yards through the middle of the uprights.

Just spitballing here. Is it possible that he was acting like a douche bag within the building?

I think Marv was more succinct when he said: Overofficious jerk

To be extra safe the masks should also cover their eyes.