Jump to content

4merper4mer

Community Member
  • Posts

    21,782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 4merper4mer

  1. Bob Lanier
  2. Dude what percentage of the population has both heard of Ernie Pyle and would see Dana Indiana as a solid clue? WTF are you doing?
  3. @ExiledInIllinois if you're going to frowny face my critique, the least you could do is fill in the blanks of the Chilli Peppers vowel swap out of state town. Thanks in advance.
  4. I dinstincly remember seeing irrefutable analytical evidence proving Duck Dodgers was superior to Josh Allen.
  5. Either copycats or some sort of marketing ploy. We all know what it isn’t.
  6. Loretta Swit?
  7. That has to be the worst clue I have ever seen in any game I have ever played. If you replaced his grandmas middle name with his third cousins birthday while singing happy birthday on 7th street would he be Americana? Getting back to current clues: Dead In the 90s American crappy musician who did some acting. I’m going to go with Jon Bon Jersey because he is dead to me...I think I first heard him in the 90s so that’s when he was dead to me....he was a crappy musician who did some acting. Did I get it?
  8. I don't think the Jets GM is completely safe.
  9. The girl who lost her comb?
  10. One word sums up all of the above: Arbitrary You can add subjective if you'd like. Neither is good. The scheduling stuff may be consistent but it is entirely unfair. I just read that Dobbins and Ingram who would have been otherwise unable to play are now able due solely to the deference given to the cheating team by the NFL. Denver had to play without a QB. Advantage: cheating
  11. Classy. You are, of course, wrong about the NFL having a consistent and understandable overall policy. If you understood it you would have simply stated the punishments the Ravens will face. You'd have done so with specificity. Instead you sling insults. You don't know what the Ravens punishments will be because the NFL is making it up as they go along. Some of your comparisons between the Broncos/Ravens scheduling are well explained. They are consistent. That doesn't make them reasonable or fair because they aren't. But they're consistent. They are also designed in a way where the NFL can use partial data to paint whatever picture they want.
  12. Tolstoying the explanation doesn't make The NFLs approach a good policy. It actually shows how difficult is is to understand. Any sound policy can be explain succinctly. You can claim consistency all you want as the NFL continues to change the day of the same game multiple times. If a jurisdiction has a policy of the electric chair for someone who steals gum from the 7-11 and ten minutes probation at the time of the culprit's choosing for burning down their neighbor's house, that is consistent, but bad. But IMO you'd really have to be drinking a lot of Gaslight Grape flavored Koolaid to say the policy is consistent whe the punishments for what the Ravens and Titans have done are described in vague terms like "harsh" and "hammered" rather than being understandable pre-described specific penalties such as "loss of a pick in round x for violation type a", "fine of $x for violation type b", but there isn't any of that. IYHO is that really consistent?
  13. I agree and there is nuance in everything but on one play Brady threw a pass off a DL's helmet and Romo went on for a minute about how Mike Evans screwed up the play.
  14. It's a load. Titans literally held practices and were photographed by HS kids and the NFL swept it under the rug and went along with Tenn's pleas of ignorance. That was a joke as every fan knew this was not allowed but the NFL decided to gaslight instead. Baltimore had coaches concealing information and purposely avoiding rules and got a reprieve. Denver QBs had a sandwich and the hammer came down. It's a complex situation with a lot of moving parts and that makes it hard to act with consistency. Add the fact the NFLs "punishments" are described with vague terms like 'harsh" rather than specific penalties like "forfeit" or "loss of round x draft pick" and you've got a recipe for what you're looking at now. Denver had to play without a QB. Baltimore should have to play without getting back any player that would have been unable to go on Thursday or afterward, but they will get some back. Tenn got AJ Brown back for their games against us and Pitt due to the delay they caused and a bunch of other teams had their schedules switched around. The more a team has ignored rules, the more the NFL has been forced to bend over. And bend over they have.
  15. Slightly more there but still stupid.
  16. He tried to deflect the ball, and it was physically impossible to stop. He grazed him. I get the technicality but come on.
  17. That flag is a joke. I'm sorry.
  18. Also he doesn't know his way around the stadium yet so he couldn't find Goff's hand to shake it.
  19. He bounced it off a lineman's helmet and they blamed Evans.
  20. Was thinking of Hammill On TV?
  21. Denver's new QB Hinton? Technically not dead yet but I still think it might be him.
  22. What was her other name?
  23. I always thought that was James Earl Jones. Sounds EXACTLY like him. RIP
  24. Makes no sense. The Jets are bad. They played the Chiefs on the road. You can't sY the Ciefs don't have a home find advantage because the Jets are bad. The Chiefs do have a home field advantage IMO. The Jets ineptitude erases whatever advantage they may gain fro being at home. They are just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...