4merper4mer

Resulting in missed FG. Ref's definitely playing favorites.

The situation is probably too far gone but boozers aren't exactly a net positive either.

Does this guy have tiger blood?

They might be afraid of catching Covid from our tight ends.

Neither John Wayne nor Liberace were war heroes so that us a list of zero.

If you substitute this guys middle initial into a quadratic equation to solve for the value of x does it result in the first digit of the house number he grew up in ? If you change four letters of the street of his youth and add 23 more letters can you get the opening line of a movie made in 1962 about the geopolitical underpinnings of Eastern Europe before the war? Asking for a friend.

Just when you though we couldn't be surrounded by any more incoherent idiots this comes along.

Alex Guiness

Aliens have been marketed to us for years. It was intriguing until the notion was disproven. Now it is just boring most of the time. Some of the shows and movies can still be pretty cool.

Bob Lanier

Dude what percentage of the population has both heard of Ernie Pyle and would see Dana Indiana as a solid clue? WTF are you doing?

@ExiledInIllinois if you're going to frowny face my critique, the least you could do is fill in the blanks of the Chilli Peppers vowel swap out of state town. Thanks in advance.

I dinstincly remember seeing irrefutable analytical evidence proving Duck Dodgers was superior to Josh Allen.

Either copycats or some sort of marketing ploy. We all know what it isn’t.

Loretta Swit?

That has to be the worst clue I have ever seen in any game I have ever played. If you replaced his grandmas middle name with his third cousins birthday while singing happy birthday on 7th street would he be Americana? Getting back to current clues: Dead In the 90s American crappy musician who did some acting. I’m going to go with Jon Bon Jersey because he is dead to me...I think I first heard him in the 90s so that’s when he was dead to me....he was a crappy musician who did some acting. Did I get it?

I don't think the Jets GM is completely safe.

The girl who lost her comb?

One word sums up all of the above: Arbitrary You can add subjective if you'd like. Neither is good. The scheduling stuff may be consistent but it is entirely unfair. I just read that Dobbins and Ingram who would have been otherwise unable to play are now able due solely to the deference given to the cheating team by the NFL. Denver had to play without a QB. Advantage: cheating

Classy. You are, of course, wrong about the NFL having a consistent and understandable overall policy. If you understood it you would have simply stated the punishments the Ravens will face. You'd have done so with specificity. Instead you sling insults. You don't know what the Ravens punishments will be because the NFL is making it up as they go along. Some of your comparisons between the Broncos/Ravens scheduling are well explained. They are consistent. That doesn't make them reasonable or fair because they aren't. But they're consistent. They are also designed in a way where the NFL can use partial data to paint whatever picture they want.

Tolstoying the explanation doesn't make The NFLs approach a good policy. It actually shows how difficult is is to understand. Any sound policy can be explain succinctly. You can claim consistency all you want as the NFL continues to change the day of the same game multiple times. If a jurisdiction has a policy of the electric chair for someone who steals gum from the 7-11 and ten minutes probation at the time of the culprit's choosing for burning down their neighbor's house, that is consistent, but bad. But IMO you'd really have to be drinking a lot of Gaslight Grape flavored Koolaid to say the policy is consistent whe the punishments for what the Ravens and Titans have done are described in vague terms like "harsh" and "hammered" rather than being understandable pre-described specific penalties such as "loss of a pick in round x for violation type a", "fine of $x for violation type b", but there isn't any of that. IYHO is that really consistent?

I agree and there is nuance in everything but on one play Brady threw a pass off a DL's helmet and Romo went on for a minute about how Mike Evans screwed up the play.

It's a load. Titans literally held practices and were photographed by HS kids and the NFL swept it under the rug and went along with Tenn's pleas of ignorance. That was a joke as every fan knew this was not allowed but the NFL decided to gaslight instead. Baltimore had coaches concealing information and purposely avoiding rules and got a reprieve. Denver QBs had a sandwich and the hammer came down. It's a complex situation with a lot of moving parts and that makes it hard to act with consistency. Add the fact the NFLs "punishments" are described with vague terms like 'harsh" rather than specific penalties like "forfeit" or "loss of round x draft pick" and you've got a recipe for what you're looking at now. Denver had to play without a QB. Baltimore should have to play without getting back any player that would have been unable to go on Thursday or afterward, but they will get some back. Tenn got AJ Brown back for their games against us and Pitt due to the delay they caused and a bunch of other teams had their schedules switched around. The more a team has ignored rules, the more the NFL has been forced to bend over. And bend over they have.

Slightly more there but still stupid.

He tried to deflect the ball, and it was physically impossible to stop. He grazed him. I get the technicality but come on.