Jump to content

4merper4mer

Community Member
  • Posts

    21,396
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 4merper4mer

  1. Maybe we get Jay Clocker instead.
  2. It does not seem like Rivet is a big fan. Holy crap.
  3. Judge for yourself. I haven’t watched yet but this must be the reference.
  4. Born and raised in Boston. Insinuates the Sabres never had a good fan base. Hey Jack, Occum’s Shaver called and said it’s pretty likely that you are a douche.
  5. Agreed but it is silly that all the mocks people on this board put together have us taking him in the 6th or 7th. He will 99.99% be gone well before the 5th is over.
  6. Trading Edmunds seems to be the solution to everything. Why waste it on Mack? Trade him to solve hunger, global warming and create world peace and get a 4th rounder.
  7. You left out: Guys whose last name starts with G Guys with dreads Guys who pout Guys who point fingers at teammates Former DPOYs Former Panthers…..of course
  8. Any updates on this?
  9. Robinson if healthy makes this offense un stop a bull. I agree he will probably be too expensive but there is a slim chance the market is soft and/or he prioritizes winning over $.
  10. Jackson blows. Allen Robinson.
  11. Dude. If your negativity is to be believed consistently you have to be at least realistic.
  12. One game is all you’ve seen from Davis? Shirley.
  13. Murray dug a very deep hole and Botts was nowhere near equipped to handle that….he got painted into corners and made it worse. It hasn’t really gotten worse at all this year, it’s just been the realization of the inevitable. Tim Murray was absolutely the worst GM in the history of professional sports. The Sabres should have petitioned the league to jettison his entire construct and be allowed to re-enter the NHL as an expansion team.
  14. It’s as logical as anything else claiming intelligent aliens exist.
  15. Did you reply to the wrong post?
  16. I’ve seen write ups indicating that punter could go as early as the second round. That seems crazy to me but I doubt he lasts to the sixth.
  17. Doesn’t sound completely ludicrous but….. 1. I doubt a bird would figure that out. “Birdbrain” is a word for a reason 2. Any thoughts on the galaxies that have been discovered to have no dark matter at all?
  18. Is that your favorite way governments are wasting time and money or are there better ones IYHO?
  19. Prove that some whales don’t have gills. I did that on purpose btw but nice catch nonetheless. There are things that are “literally zero” and others that are “effectively zero”. Yes, there is a difference which is real but it is so immeasurably small that it isn’t worth considering.
  20. He said it. I agreed. Get all up in his business if you’re going to get up in mine. I’m also sure that there are no whales in the ocean that create billiard balls in their gills and shoot them into the corner pocket from their blowholes. Is logic against me on that too?
  21. I put down $100 on Reid Ferguson and if he wins I’m going to buy the Jets Pats and Fish and give us a 6-0 start every year.
  22. I can’t prove something doesn’t exist. It just that everything points in that direction. I was quoting the other poster acknowledgment of such.
  23. Math suggests nothing of the sort. Sitcom interpretation of math and wishful thinking suggests the universe is teeming with life. Actual math, partly referenced above with the mention of the Fermi paradox, suggests a far different picture. Your next sentence attempts to refute it with vague nothingness but I’m the one not arguing points? How about one example of something viable that refutes the Fermi paradox? Brownlee and Ward are hardly known. Why is that? Von Neumann anyone? You can’t make bank on crappy sci fis and sitcoms unless you ignore math. At least you recognize that we are alone in our own galaxy. That’s a start. Keep up the objectivity. It is interesting to ponder the broken link in sitcom math but one of those numbers is a zero.
  24. It’s already in the thread and is explained very directly as you requested. The discussion is about intelligent communicative life and does not involve any speculation on microbial life/etc so your question is not exactly the same.
×
×
  • Create New...