Hah! We are now crossing posts with each other...
What is interesting is that the slight difference in extra point distance has really mucked with the kickers' heads apparently, despite the range being easy FG territory.
I don't fully understand that. I would not have predicted moving the ball back this amount would alter the success rate this much.
Something fun to consider would be a total re-haul of the entire point scoring system.
There's a pretty big difference between scoring 3 points for a FG and 6, 7, or 8 for a TD.
And it's a lot easier these days for kickers to hit a long FG making it much easier than scoring a TD.
If the point scoring gap was reduced between a FG and a TD to only a couple points for example, many more games would be close right until the end, or to put it another way, it would be much harder for a better team to pull away and blow out a weaker opponent.
You would think the NFL and its sponsors would be all over this idea, as I have to imagine tons of games are turned off at halftime in a blowout.