EmotionallyUnstable

Rinse, wash, repeat! That's what it's been the past 15 years, but this year has to be different. I mean come on, Sammy is on the bike!

Dareus can play the NT. I picture them taking a 5T DE in a late round. Interested to see how Rex puts together different packages for particular situations

Wow very impressed. Poised, great strength and size with plenty of time to fix mechanics. Thanks for posting

If that were the case (idt we have a guy like that now), then absolutely. If a current player a not a fit, why not

Doug is a wild man. However, I don't see them moving back. I'm not sure teams are going to be too crazy about moving up. There is good depth this year at OL, LB, WR and RB. No one would move up in that position of a QB. Elite edge rushers and DT will be gone. I'm not sure what a team would want to move up to 50 for. CB? S?

Regardless of what we would get in Dalton, I imagine what we would lose, whether it be future picks or current talent, would be greater. No deal on that premise alone.

the amount of sarcasm and irony in this thread is amazing.

Sammy Woods Clay and Harvin in a two by two set. Shady and QB in the gun. I love this because Clay gives us an extra blocker it receiver threat. You can use either Harvin or Sammy in motion creating a trips. Put the defense on islands, get our guys 1 on 1 match ups, and the QB can take the one that he likes best.

Being neither a fan on Cortland or the Jets, I'm not sure how I feel about this move. Oh that's right, who cares, go bills.

Kdiggz with the dagger! If the bills take a QB in the second, I imagine he'll get a fair look in camp. But Rex seems pretty set on having a true competition. That being said, I think taking a QB at 50 is ill advised. We should be able to get competent QB play from someone already on our roster. I don't see anyone at 50 (Petty, Grayson) being an immediate upgrade. This team is built to win now, and would be much better served taking a plug and play guy.

This might be the most flawed logic of all time.

Lol. True story

To judge Pears struggles on his height is irrational. To compare Henderson to Pears because of their similarity in height is unfair. Sure, leverage is an issue. But to assume a taller player can't play guard is just wrong. If you have a rational reason they won't look at him at guard, I'm all ears. For what it's worth, Mike Iupati is 6'5"

Damn....

Kaepernick is overrated.

He played Guard in College at certain points, obviously, leverage was an issue. Sure, it would be a gamble, but Roman has proven successful with bigger guards

I'm with you on this. Getting best OL allows Roman tons of options and it is definitely our greatest need

😆 That's great. You must have tapped into his voicemail...

I have seasons in 241, where are you guys trying to sit for the opener? Might be interested in upgrading for 2 tix

Yes please.

Henderson to Guard?

Believe me, I'm all for best OL at 50. I think we may be saying the same thing in different ways. Funchess does not fit a need. With regards to Bradham, I see Rex utilizing a lot of 4-3 looks. We have the personel for it. Bradham is a great blitzed and a tackling machine. I wouldn't mark Brown as a thumper, like spikes. Denzel Perryman could be a replacement at 50

It's possible Bradham is an OLB in this system, we know nothing about Powell. Spikes is not a done deal. They are lacking a thumper in the middle. About your TE ideas, I agree that Funchess is more of a receiver and something we don't need. But this thread is about #50, not post-op Veterans. If you're looking for a TE at 50, Clive Walford might be the pick

Good argument. It's possible they view the OGs as currently on the roster. It surely will be interesting to see how it shakes out.

Are we really in a position to spend our highest draft pick on a WR with such a glaring hole at OL?