EmotionallyUnstable

I guess I'm just nervous that his arrival and the potential he brings will change the game plan and force Lynne to make this offense something that it is not. Chicken or the egg

I don't see how he fits in as a "starter." Who is no longer on the field. Are we expecting a lot of 11 personnel this weekend? If so, Felton is out. If we are in the 21, is Harvin over Glass? Idk what to make up this, mostly because with the amount of rotations in today's NFL, it doesn't matter who starts. It isn't soccer.

You at 30,000 other ppl

I'm not sure the answer but I do know this: I love watching this young man play football

This is where I have mixed feelings on Lynn as a coordinator. Although it is his first year and this isnt really the offense he wants to run, I have a hard time understanding some of his decisions. I find myself praising him for exploiting matchups at times but then I'll curse him later in the game for allowing certain matchups (Mills v. Avril) to continue to be a thorn in our sides

Great way to control your match ups.

Groy v. Atkins next weekend...

Does JPP have specially made gloves?

But seriously though, Marvin Lewis for Rex straight up trade. Would you do it?

Cut Eifert, he is always hurt Really? Hmmm a time share running back takin the heat?

Do Bengals fans talk about a player like we do Mario/Gilmore? If so, who? I feel like they have a talented roster. Why are they worse this year

CIN wins are against average to below average opponents and their losses/tie to quality opponents. Are we the same team?

Shady will have a field day if he can get one on one vs the Bengals LBs

Giants secondary doing their best Bills impression thus far

Well played sir.

Who will cover Eifert next weekend

Well good news is the Bengals defense looks awful so far. The bad news is that it was a complete aerial assault. Hopefully Lynn takes note

Anyone But Cassel Wait, what?

Good read here on what makes teams elite in the RZ. Those looking for a quick summary, Mays calls Brady and Brees the top RZ QBs for the ability to throw the ball with accuracy as well and the scheme that their offenses present. On the other end, he also claims TT, Prescott and in particular, Newton, give teams an edge with being able to run the ball in a unique fashion that certain teams just don't posses. So which side are you on? Is TT effective enough in the RZ as a runner to make up for his inability to throw the ball with pin point accuracy and precision? I believe he is. And if used correctly, as Mays puts it, could be devastating. https://theringer.com/nfl-offenses-red-zone-efficiency-panthers-saints-patriots-3f6ae285941a#.belxkuz76

This is why social media is both awesome and awful

I agree. A player of his potential forces defenses to game plan differently. Certain players, Clay in particular, has taken a lot of heat for his lack of production. Sure, he has been underwhelming thus far but I do think having a real threat will open up areas for Clay to thrive. Now if we can just figure out how to get our guys the ball so they aren't running out of bounds, into defenders or out of bounds....

I'm all for spreading the ball too. So many people suggest heavily targeting Sammy, myself included. I just hope people who call for Watkins 10 targets a game understand that those 10 targets have to be meaningful. He is not a similar receiver to Mike Evans or Julio Jones, where you can just throw it up to him. IMO, these targets need to be calculated throws that were crafted on a weekly basis to expose match ups. I'd hate to see the hitch, hitch, fade pattern continue. To me, that wasn't working. I'm curious on how the board feels he needs to be used moving forward?

Currently, the Bills sit 12th in the AFC.

I see where you're coming from here. I agree with a lot. Although I disagree that adding a better player wouldn't help. The Bills are awful at YAC and it feels as if they rarely make plays after getting the ball. I think this offense misses a guy like Watkins who has shown he can turn the 8 yard slant into 80. Bob Woods showed a little of this Monday night but not nearly enough to be considered a number one option. Adding homerun, play makers who can make something happen after the catch will help. On the other hand, I'm not sure this offense is conceptually built to put guys in the position to make plays after the catch. It is the absolute opposite scheme of Brady. We take the hitches, the short outs, the safe throws and gain minimal yards after the catch. The Pats*** do an excellent job of getting the ball to players in a position where they can make plays. Some hang this on TT, but I think it's scheme more than anything.

This is not a smart idea.