snafu

It it takes a village to raise an idiot.

I hear that the Trump Admin is complaining that this move will violate sanctions in place. Moon says that's not so. Either way, seems like grease for the unification skid.

I bet your popularity would increase if you totally shut up.

A little boozy is how I like my women. I'm going with that.

Same reason why I predicted Ocasio might lose. If Crowley (who is on the WPF line) takes votes away, and the moron Republican (who's not making any noise) puts forth an effort, then things get tight. See, great minds do think like me.

Unless (and I doubt it will happen) Nixon stays on the ballot. Hard left Progressives in NYC hate Cuomo that much. They must be thinking about it.

I also would add that I don't trust this regime to spend next year's $90 million cap on free agents when they've shown about a 50/50 success rate. They've done pretty well with draft picks, but they have a lot of holes to fill and free agency is going to be key in the offseason.

No. Imagine what shape she'd be in if she DIDN'T.

There isnt a BAD QB who would survive. Allen surviving will say a lot in and of itself.

The " process" was to bring McCarron in as a bridge so they could ease Allen in. They passed up much better QBs in the offseason for McCarron. No more bridge. Put the kid in. If he has a bad time, they will rightly blame the crappy offensive line and fix that before they take another QB high in the next draft.

Hopefully he moves into rented mule territory.

Or, it was written just to sound like the author is a conservative republican.

The Muslim Roosevelt, yes.

Piñatas are filled with candy. So there's that to look forward to.

Thats fine for open minded people who are not nor will be in office ever. Someday, Republicans won't control everything and then the retribution will begin. I've made this point before and you've already disagreed with it. Labeling Trump as a fascist has an odd side effect of painting any response he makes to Dems' efforts to oust him as: "see, he's a fascist who's trampling his political opponents." Unwittingly brilliant because D's can some day in the future use Trump's response as a reason to label every R as a Trump fascist who must be removed from office.

I'm not sure I get it yet. Seems to me like you're saying that the only difference between you and a Muslim (with regards to women) is the level of punishment for doing something that they are inferior at -- just by virtue of their gender. Maybe you can come up with a better example, yes?

No, I'm not seeing the difference. Can you give me another example?

How very Muslim of you ? .

So it wasn't sarcasm. Got it.

That's sarcasm, right?

He essentially said "Trump didn't make this nice economy, someone else made that."

To quote another poster: Any updates on this?

I'm no Trump snowflake and all this piece tells me is that it is a good thing there's no "style points" in running the executive branch. I don't like the fact that (if true) there are people in government who feel that they can act apart from government. The results of the administration speak for themselves. I guess I'm a Constitutional snowflake.

This ope-ed piece...wow. There are so many things wrong about it, but just off the top of my head: --Presuming it is true, the fact that someone in the administration thinks that they are above normal governmental functioning and chain of command is just numbing. That's as far from checks and balances as the government gets. Whether the President is a whack-job or not, this alleged cabal should be rooted out and shown the door. --I wonder what this person's background is. There's no indication as to whether this individual was a holdover from a prior regime or not. This person "outed" his resistance and consequently shot his scheme in the foot yet wanted to remain anonymous. Seems like he's trying to protect a pension more than tying to save the people. Why end the effort now? --The Times had to take the "extraordinary" measure of (a) publishing an anonymous op ed piece, and (b) explaining its decision in a preamble to the piece. Please -- that's CYA at its finest. --The author is a sniveling coward. --The Times is disingenuous, at best. --I'm being polite.

I agree with you, but there's "punching back" and then there's "kicking someone in the groin".