BillsFanNC

We're not the same.

You mean violent coup plotters don't typically show up without weapons, then successfully breach their target putting a successful coup right within their grasp...... and then turn around and go home all on their own by dinner time?

It's impossible to coexist with demoralized leftists. Period. Imagine doubling down on very fine people in 2025. These people are gone forever.

She escaped Mao's China. What could she possible know? Who launched Mao’s bloody Cultural Revolution? Radicalized students—the Red Guards. They quickly went from justifying violence to committing murder, leaving up to 20 million dead, including many of their own. Who radicalized them? The Communist education system. In America, it’s Woke Marxist professors. Our campuses have become hotbeds of anti-American radicalism. We must carry on Charlie’s legacy and reclaim our universities—because if we lose them, we lose America. Posters then and now

Yup. You can twist perceptions....reality won't budge. A couple weeks ago a trans person shot up a church in Minnesota. The MSM said the shooter being trans had nothing to do with it. A video was released of a black man murdering a white woman and then bragging about killing someone white. The MSM said race had nothing to do with it. The MSM will though now say that "white" and "young man" had everything to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.

Well the good news is my ignore list grew today. Unsurprisingly the Left is gearing up to pin this on Nick Fuentes by claiming the killer was a groyper. Unfortunately for them, that claim doesn't fit any of the facts on the ground (not that they give a damn about that). The killer labeled Kirk a "fascist." That is a term only ever used by the Left as an insult to the Right. The idea that he killed Charlie for not being right wing enough, but also considered Charlie a "fascist," is totally incoherent. Absolute nonsense.

Groyper. Obviously.

Ok, I'll hand it to you. I didn't anticipate you going with the iron law of woke projection here. Good work.

I know it's a tough concept to grasp, Logic 😄, but anything not related to the Charlie Kirk assassination is relevant here, particularly when I'm asking you DIRECTLY about why leftists exclusively are celebrating with glee about Charlie Kirk's "right wing" inspired assassin. Now, try again. No John Wilkes Booth or Lee Harvey Oswald, let's stay on point!

Yes, yes he is.

I didn't say deflection. Can you at least try to twist a little take as to why the left is exclusively gleeful at cold blooded murder?

Let's grant you your insane conclusion that this was a guy driven to do this by right wing ideology. That doesn't change the fact that the celebratory glee at cold blooded murder is exclusively coming from the left. Or do you want to twist yourself into another pretzel on that too?

You can when you're hellbent on twisting yourself into a pretzel of absurdity

Been here since 2002. Got a year on ya.

Anything you must do to ignore the language spoken on repeat for a decade exclusively by Democrats.

No, it's anything but that. Video games, 4chan, groyper, Halloween costumes..... Anything but the exact language used for the past decade on repeat from the media and dem leaders to describe Trump, Kirk etc. It can't be that. It must not be that.

I can post however I want. Again, you're sounding like Billstime/Roundy, who I'd bet have actually tried to report me for ignoring them. 😂 And I likely would chill and have a beer with both of you, or maybe I'd find you both to be actual morons. But we'll never know. Triggered! 😂 Jauronimo shows up down here once in a blue moon. Sometimes I remind him of his moronic posts, and it wasn't just the trans stuff, sometimes I don't. Sounds like you're a bit triggered because I called out your buddy. Don't worry I'm sure that Jauronimo, despite being a moron, will be just fine.

Yup