BillsFanNC
-
Posts
23,500 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillsFanNC
-
-
-
-
3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:
Well that was quite an extensive list.
And spot on of course.
The red wave is coming but I am extremely skeptical that they will accomplish anything of substance. It's more likely to be GOP as usual that talks big and then does nothing.
-
1
-
-
-
-
3 minutes ago, TH3 said:
Dude …he lost.
And he's still in your head. Every. single. day.
Like I said, it's beautiful.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
Really? Trumpers would re-elect Biden over her? Maybe. That’s unexpected
In a Liz Cheney vs. Dementia patient/Kamala race you may have a very strong possibility of a third party candidate winning is what I meant.
-
1 minute ago, B-Man said:
‘Got a bad case of the Schiffs’: Liz Cheney telling peeps to ‘stay tuned’ for more J6 hearings
(conveniently right before midterms) does NOT go well
From Jonathan Turley:
At the same time, Cheney and the Committee Chair have repeatedly stressed that voters cannot allow Trump to return to power and made repeated references to the upcoming election. The lack of any balance in the scope of examinations or presentation of evidence only magnifies the appearance of an investigation tailored political rather than investigative priorities.
So now Cheney is saying “stay tuned” once again like a sequel that never quite ends. Of course, the members know that their control will end if the midterms result (as expected) in the GOP retaking the House. The Republicans have stated an intention to conduct their own investigation into why the House was unprepared for the riot despite failings of possible violence.
The Jan. 6 committee has made a case against Trump personally and politically. It has not done so criminally. Timing further releases to coincide with the election will do little in establishing an interest in building a criminal rather than a political case.
Because it’s ALL political.
.
Stop. Politicians aren't political. Especially when they tell you that they are only concerned with the truth. When you doubt them when they say that then guess what? You sir or madam are a conspiracy theorist.
Also remember that when the GOP puts together a J6 committee of their own and they also promise to be about only finding the truth that it will be different. Because when that happens you must not merely doubt everything that they tell you, you must reject all of it. If you don't then you will be, you guessed it, a conspiracy theorist.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
I didn’t say it was a winner… but people forget specifics over time and the msm has inadvertently propped her up as a hero.
the average voter is a complete moron.
if she could buy her way through a primary I could see a slam dunk Presidential run for a third party candidate.
FIFY
-
And right on schedule with another response that I won't read.
I suppose this is a perfect place to start up again as I've been woefully lacking on my weekly promise to post the following....
Hey @BillStime ***** off!
-
5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:
Yeah, I don't get why people are so quick to label something / somebody either all good or all bad without any nuance.
Nuance? I'm not so sure how well this flies coming from the guy who refuses to acknowledge that politicians primarily have political motivations. When you're able to come to grips with that bit of nuance then maybe people will take your J6 musings a little more seriously.
-
This is why Trump is fantastic.
He had all the dems and more than half of Republicans triggered to the nth degree the moment he announced that he was running.
Being anti Trump holds these disparate factions together in unity with far greater zeal than any party platform planks ever could. And that alone says so very much about how BOTH parties suck major ass.
This is why people from both parties voted for him, and will vote for him again. He shook the tree and made them expose themselves in the light of day for all to see.
How an orange blowhard narcissistic ahole exposed the game and its corrupt to the core players. So beautiful to watch.
-
1
-
-
It must be so confusing for the left to keep track of when villains on the right go from nazis to heroes and back again.
See: Cheney, Dick. Hutchison, Cassidy.
-
More CoSpIRaCy theories!!!!
....or something
-
1
-
-
-
-
2 hours ago, Doc said:
Yeah. It's like Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony: "I heard..."
"I heard that person x said something to the effect of..."
She said that same preamble dozens of times in her testimony.
-
-
40 minutes ago, wnyguy said:
So if Putin and Russia helped Trump win in 2016 where were they in 2020? Those Commie bastards let us down.
Didn't you hear? It was the most secure election in US history! Those Russkis couldn't give Trump any help in 2020.
A Republican wins? Fraud. Because pee tapes and other unsubstantiated innuendo. Case closed you loony conspiracy theorists asking for actual evidence.
A democrat wins? Not only is it fair and secure with no significant evidence of widespread fraud. No, no, no that doesn't go nearly far enough.....it was the most secure election in US history!!!
A simple ruse that works quite well on the simple minded.
-
1
-
-
But never you mind about election week 2020 because it was the most secure election in US history!
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, aristocrat said:
any comment on the actual post instead of deflecting?
The answer to this question is no.
It was no yesterday, last week, last month and last year. It will be no tomorrow, the day after tomorrow and on and on.
My suggestion is to use the ignore function.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
8 hours ago, B-Man said:
The American Media should not be trusted.
Washington Post Sinks to New Lows in Write-Up of Death of Rep. Jackie Walorski
The Ministry Of Truth
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted