BillsFanNC
-
Posts
23,500 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillsFanNC
-
-
22 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:
The best line is when the “journalist” says “we’re not going to do your work for you”…🤯
Basically, what she unknowingly admitted was that she, as a “journalist”, does not consider it HER work to investigate this particular news story…Because she, as a Leftist, chooses not to do any journalism that benefits the Right- even though it is her job!
You don’t get to ignore a major news story because it’s politically inconvenient…That’s not journalism- it’s political activism…And is why the msm ratings are in the tank, and people are turning to independent journalists…👍
The extended clip is even better.
Christiane Amanpour: "as you know perfectly well, I'm a journalist and a reporter, and I follow the facts..."
-
2
-
-
-
1 hour ago, Doc said:
Like I've said, I've been telling my colleague, who has been a lifelong Dem, that the media is liberally slanted. He now agrees and gives me examples of how they are. So there is hope.
That's good to hear and does give hope for people with a shred of honesty remaining, but we are well past slanted with the media and into democrat party activism.
1 hour ago, Westside said:FIFY
I don't take issue with his saying the press is diligent. There's no denying that they are indeed diligent activists.
-
1
-
-
-
More free press. So much freedom and honesty!
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:
Twitter is not the press anymore than the Pennysaver is.
Like I said.
Broken.
A free press paid for by taxpayers.
-
1
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
I'm not broke. and the New York post recently showcased a cartoon of trump as humpty dumpty. Even the Murdoch's smell the coffee.
A free press!
Broken.
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
Imagine still believing, in 2023, that reporting a story that will reflect negatively on a democrat president will provide anything remotely close to the facts.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
Thank God that we still have a free and diligent press
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/09/bannon-brazil-riots-trump-00077155
The NY Post says hi.
He broke you. Fully completely broke you.
-
1
-
-
Imagine still believing, in 2023, that reporting a story that will reflect negatively on a democrat president will provide anything remotely close to the facts.
-
2
-
-
15 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
Yet you used the article to claim that “when Newsweek sees the truth” or some such nonsense
Time magazine and yes the truth is in there. The left, like with everything else Trump, is just fine ignoring the truth as long as the latest get Trump effort works
Edit: and by works I mean it gets the rest of the left to continue nodding along in unison. In practice we know these efforts continue to bat .000.
-
1
-
3
-
-
8 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
you completely missed the point of the article. disparate interests sought to preserve the foundation of democracy: elections. without trust in elections, democracy ceases to exist. This is exactly what the far right is trying to achieve. Here and in Brazil and likely some other country next. Then presumably they give autocrats like trump the power through violence and mob rule. Sound familiar?
Right.
Working behind the scenes to get "the proper election outcome" by unconstitutionally changing laws, supporting massive mail in balloting based on covid fear mongering and having a leftist billionaire contribute millions to 'fortifying" election infrastructure only add up to "saving democracy" if you're a TDS addled fascist.
I understand what the article was attempting to argue. I also understand it makes perfect sense to all who suffer from TDS, but since Trump actually broke you and divorced you from reality going forward it is of no surprise that you completely missed what the article admits to.
Saving democracy with commie tactics. Brilliant!
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:
Just came here expecting to see the usual complete lack of understanding of facts, how things work, and what the law is and I was not disappointed.
Don’t ever change, PPP.
Hey chigoose comes to hand wave his way around how this is different.
Shocking!
Never change chigoose you crazy former republican you
-
1
-
1
-
-
54 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
Did you actually read the article and not just the title?
Oh I've read it. Did you?
Curious that you stopped quoting where you did. The very next section is this...
Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears. They executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks,
Changing voting laws in many instances were not done through state legislatures. Clearly unconstitutional. What were you saying earlier about only following the constitution when convenient? Time to look in the mirror.
Millions in private funding = zuck bucks.
Millions of Americans voting by mail for the first time? BOTH parties told us for decades that more mail in voting is more opportunity for fraud.
They were not rigging, but instead "fortifying" the election. Uh huh.
Influence perceptions, change laws (often unconstitutionally), steering the media and controlling the flow of information...
Fascists say what?
That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures
Now this part is my favorite. Nothing, absolutely nothing I tell you says "saving democracy" quite like working in concert behind the scenes to make sure that "the proper outcome" is achieved.
“Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,” says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. “But it’s massively important for the country to understand that it didn’t happen accidentally. The system didn’t work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.”
Trump absolutely broke so many of you. You're forever lost to reality.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
Insurrection. Not seditious conspiracy which is ridiculous on its own, but we're talking insurrection here.
Surely there must be insurrection charges if an insurrection occurred, right?
-
2
-
-
I wonder when someone, anyone is going to be charged with insurrection for taking part in the "insurrection"?
-
-
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
I don't give 2 Shites about Ray Epps. He was there. He's a moron. If others got more punishment because of him, it's fine by me.
Again we know the left doesn't care about Epps. They either "don't care" or keep telling people to just leave him alone.
Why is the question you can't answer.
A MAGA insurrectionist.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
So Trump is responsible. logic's not your thing. Yes, Rehl's trial started today but I don't see many MAGA's attacking or blaming him.
Why does the left choose to vigorously defend one and only one MAGA insurrectionist in Ray Epps?
A: Why doesn't the right attack one guy among thousands of J6 defendants?
The whole friggin point is that Ray Epps hasn't become a defendant himself when clear video evidence exists to put him well beyond what many others have been arrested and charged for.
There is no wiggling out of that. No room at all. But you'll continue trying no doubt.
-
1
-
-
All of the transcipts of testimony under oath will be out in September!
So they did release portions of Kash Patel's testimony at the 11th hour, but left out key parts.
Why?
You know why. If you're awake.
-
1
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
Perhaps a better question is "Who is Zach Rehl?
you just said "more responsible than Trump"
You know who would be a great resource to tell us more about Zach Rehl?
Any or all of the eight FBI informants who infiltrated the Proud Boys in the months leading up to J6.
Also in two photos in the article you linked to you can see the orange neon hat Proud Boys. None have been arrested. Perhaps they could tell us more as well?
-
1
-
-
-
8 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
We know they'll be good at tearing things down. the question is what can they actually build?
There's no question about either party's ability to build. They can't/won't.
There's a reason why congress' approval ratings have been anemic for decades.
-
Biden, A Good American President, Pilfers Classified Docs
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
The very same FBI/DOJ that doesn't comment on ongoing investigations!