BillsFanNC

I get it. Why can't we just go back to 1995 when we had vigorous debates just over policy alone and ended up finding a middle ground and then we all just go about our lives, right? If you think we're still living in that world my friend then the world has long passed you by. You may not think that you'll have to pick a side, but you will.

Take a breath and calm down. You got Trump largely on the back of covid lying. Covid is unquestionably one of, if not the biggest, world wide events of the past century. You do remember the world shutting down, right? And our public health institutions lied continuously throughout it. I used to work in vaccine formulation. I worked on projects with HHS/CDC. So even though everyone post 2020 can claim to be an expert in any field they choose to just by declaring it, I've actually worked in the trenches on this stuff. They lied. They got caught. Now their trust is shot. You're worried about aspirin? Wait until you see what happens if we get a antiviral resistant H5N1 flu pandemic in the next twenty years....we're ***** because they lied and now nobody is listening. No comment here I suppose?

You're going to have to link to what studies from Harvard you're talking about. Covid is 100% on point when discussing public health because covid is the A#1 reason why the public lost trust in public health institutions.

Fauci and Walensky as well. They both have the "expert" credentials too. You ok with both of them acting as the voice of authority Quack? I think they're worse than RFK and Trump because as scientists they knew damn well that they were lying. At least Trump has the excuse of being a scientific simpleton.

Can you believe that Tibstain continues to misgender Kavanaugh's would be assassin? Shameful.

Well it wasn't anything and everything coming out of Harvard. It was calling out blatantly antisemitic policies and not giving them access to government funding because of it.

No lefties weighing in yet on the Google/YouTube government assisted censorship mea culpa. weird.

Finding, you seem to be very active in the forum today. But not in here: I wonder why?

Oozes credibility....

I'm not here to do your homework Sue. Questions: How many research papers have you published? What journals? Why is disclosing conflicts of interest bad?

Let me link you to a bunch of non partisan observers. See look here, the BBC says so! 😂 Btw I've never defended Trump or his significant lack of scientific acumen. But just look at the TDS patients swoop in anyway.

I'm guessing you take a lot of stabs in the dark that are dead wrong. They published their results showing an association. They said more study is needed. Science. Crazy! 😂 So his scientific research has informed him that acetaminophen can be harmful in certain doses and patient populations, he then testified as such as an expert witness, and then disclosed in a research paper that he did so. The horror of transparency!

It only took Kimmel a few short hours to get his "free speech" back. Other everyday Americans on YouTube? Years. Go censorship!

You asked if there was anything new. I showed you what is very new. And then you responded with snark. Refreshing. Was Harvard, Stanford and Oxford ok when this came out? https://gbdeclaration.org/ The answer is no. Why? Politics. As far as those particular medical associations go and their recommendations. I'd be quite skeptical on their claims of "following the science" only. Heavily politicized orgs.