BillsFanNC

This is what often happens when these X/YouTube/Rumble channel people get large enough. When they show up at leftist rallies and are recognized the organizers have people present that have the sole purpose of stopping then from interviewing anyone. It usually works and the interviewee typically moves away once they know they're talking to a conservative, but in this case below they start eating their own. But saving democracy and free speech....or something.

Oh no Finding. No more Kessler "fact checking" at WaPo!

Nice people.

The first in a series of profiles about key people from the Russia hoax. Some will be about bad actors, some will be about victims. Today we start with a victim. Her life ruined by IC criminals: Svetlana Lokhova

The Marxists here in the USA realized early on in the 20th century that they weren't going to be able to start a class war on economic grounds as in classical Marxism, the middle and lower middle class in this country had it too good. They couldn't be radicalized on a large enough scale. So they shifted, and the academics clearly wrote about this shift, to different oppressors vs oppressed models. On race. On gender. On sexual orientation. On borders. Etc... But this takes time. Decades to infiltrate institutions and indoctrinate generations of young minds. And now you have what we see all around us every single day in society and right here in PPP on these very issues. The Marxists hammer each and every one of them 24/7 with religious zeal. Useful idiots join to cause and unquestioningly parrot the talking points. BLM Free Palestine. Trans rights are human rights. Illegal immigration support groups. What do all of them have in common? 1. Oppressor vs. oppressed is a central core belief. 2. All have leaders who are avowed Marxists. It's all by design.

RoundyMao's causes: Critical Theory/DEI/Race obsessed: ✅ Free Palestine: ✅ Gender affirming care/men in women's sports/drag queen story hour: ✅ Illegal immigration globalist: ✅ Radical environmentalist: ✅ Yup, you're a useful idiot to the cultural Marxists Roundy.

Cultural Marxism RoundyMao. It's your life blood. Every single thing you post is in strict adherence to cultural Marxism. That you're a mouth breathing useful idiot and are therefore unaware of this is a feature of the cult, not a bug.

Nope. RoundyMao, like all good useful idiots, purposely conflates all types of illegal aliens in with legal ones who went through the process of entering the country legally. It's a very common Marxist practice. He still thinks it works.

Lawyer up!

😂 Finding! No one is trying to convince you of anything Finding. It's a pointless exercise. Because you're a useful idiot. Indictments are coming. No one is above the law. Enjoy!

This thread?

⬆️ Bullstojan! 😂

And right to the wood paneling glory hole!

Finding! 😂 Dutifully regurgitating reliable media. Shocking! But that would look awfully bad for Charlie Savage, who has dutifully carried water for the Russia hoax for the past decade. So, in an article and accompanying post last night, Savage downplayed the emails and falsely claimed Durham had “decided they were fakes made by Russian spies.” The problem is, that’s not what Durham concluded at all. Durham certainly never said the emails were fabricated, and in fact said he couldn’t tell for sure. He said his office was unable to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence] … was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.” Moreover, Durham’s team interviewed U.S. intelligence personnel who were “well-versed” in the matter, and they testified that their “best assessment was that the Benardo emails were likely authentic.” Savage dismisses this because these interviews happened early in Durham’s investigation. Durham also says that the CIA “prepared a written assessment of the authenticity and veracity of the above-referenced intelligence.” His description of their conclusion contains redactions, but it appears to say the CIA “stated that it did not assess that the above … memoranda … [were] the product of Russian fabrications.” In his report, Durham also noted contemporaneous events that lent credence to the claim that Clinton had approved the plan. “On July 29, 2016 — three days after the purported approval of the Clinton Plan intelligence — Michael Sussmann and Marc Elias, the General Counsel to the Clinton campaign, met with Fusion GPS personnel in Elias’s office at Perkins Coie,” Durham noted. Fusion GPS was the firm that hired Christopher Steele to cook up the Steele dossier. Also notable: Just days before the purported email alleging Clinton’s “approval” of the plan, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook was floating the claim to Jake Tapper that the Russians were meddling in the election “for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump” — which would become a central claim of the Russia collusion hoax. Savage and his co-author and fellow Russiagate truther Adam Goldman rely heavily on two things to claim the purported Benardo emails are fake. First, they point to a line in the annex in which Durham says his “best assessment” is that the purported Benardo emails “were ultimately a composite of several emails,” which is obviously not the same thing as saying he thought the Russians completely made them up. Second, they rely on denials from the Clinton campaign. But they also represent those inaccurately. Savage and Goldman say Benardo “told Mr. Durham in 2021 that he had never seen the message and did not write it.” If you actually read the annex, Durham says, “Benardo stated that, to the best of his recollection, he did not draft the emails” but that “the last sentence in the email … sounded like something he would have said.”