BillsFanNC

⬆️ Swallows loads of commie projection propaganda. Every. Single. Time.

The iron law never misses: Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say."

Gee, I wonder if they'll weaponize this against X? 100% guaranteed.

Fact check: True Link to permit issued by the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE below.

No it doesn't. It dutifully skipped the part that J6 was permitted and sanctioned to occur on Capitol grounds just like any other protest. You know that pesky 1st ammendment and all. or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Again for the useful idiots who will point out "peaceably," that of course is what parts 2 and 3 of Davis' post addresses. Those who either trespassed or were violent should be APPROPRIATELY charged. Those who remained peaceful are PROTECTED. This is why you morons are commies.

Fact check: True

So were all the ""you's" in your post directed at me or did you mean Orange Jesus implying things again?

Yeah, that's exactly what I was talking about. Stuff to do. How much IN SCHOOL learning did your kids miss out on? I'm going to assume that you're not a church going person, but how long were your local churches closed to your friends and neighbors? How many local small businesses in your area that were thriving pre March 2020, are now closed because the government said they couldn't do business? How many vaccinations did you need to get in order to not lose your job? Congrats if you didn't fall into this category, because many did.

Fact check: True

Presidential Records Act v. Espionage Act: The Presidential Records Act of 1978 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201 through 2209, generally controls the handling of the President's records. Generally, records created or received by the President or this White House staff are presidential records. This includes classified records sent to advise the President or his White House staff. Before the Presidential Records Act, Presidents owned their presidential records. Congress changed the law after Nixon won a legal fight on this issue. After the Presidential Records Act, the U.S. government owns Presidents' presidential records. Per the 2012 Obama judge ruling in the Clinton sock-drawer case, where President Clinton stuffed 8 years of highly classified audio recordings of his presidency in his sock drawer (see picture 1 below), the President solely decides what are: - "personal" (belong to him) v. - "presidential records" (belong to government). And if the President doesn't designate them as presidential records and then takes them when he leaves office, they are deemed personal records. (Read news story and linked opinion here: justthenews.com/politics-polic…) But even if people think this 2012 Obama judge ruling protecting Clinton is incorrect or Trump (somehow) shouldn't have the benefit of this ruling (because they hate and fear Trump): "[T]he Presidential records of a former President shall be available to such former President or the former President's designated representative." 44 U.S.C. § 2205(3) (see picture 2 below). Former Presidents do not have the right to have any classified record they want. But they have the absolute statutory right to have (not own) their presidential records, classified or not. There is no criminal component to the Presidential Records Act. Disputes are settled with negotiations and civil lawsuits. Not unprecedented and unlawful raid and indictments. How can Trump violate the Espionage Act for retaining his presidential records he is allowed to have (not own) under the Presidential Records Act? Garland must allege and prove more than mere retention, in order to charge a former president for espionage for having his presidential records he's allowed to have (not own) under the Presidential Records Act. One way a court may attempt to harmonize the Presidential Records Act with the Espionage Act is requiring the government to allege and prove the former President intended to cause "injury to the United States or aid to a foreign nation result from the disclosures." United States v. Rosen, 520 F. Supp. 2d 786, 793 (E.D. Va. 2007). There is zero evidence--not even an allegation--Trump intended to harm America by retaining his presidential records. It is not a crime to be a jerk. It is not "espionage" to fight with librarians and other bureaucrats. We do not send former presidents, who happen to be your boss's chief political enemy, to die in prison over presidential-records disputes. This is one key reason Garland's indictment of Trump is fatally flawed as a matter of law.

Fact and legal check: True January 6th was a lawful protest, permitted by the National Park Service, that devolved into a riot. There are 3 categories of protesters, including those who: 1. Follow the rules, even if you think they’re wrong or even crazy = protected. 2. Trespass = charged. 3. Violent = treated more severely. But we can’t have different rules, based upon political views, like Biden does for his base of BLM, antifa, Hamas, trans, and abortion terrorists. It is unforgivable Biden, his Justice Department, hyper-partisan Democrat judges, and incredibly weak and dumb Republican judges maliciously misapplied our federal laws to destroy political enemies. January 6th defendants, their families, and their attorneys owe a special thanks to @julie_kelly2. There is no chance in hell the Supreme Court would have taken the Fischer case, but for Julie’s dogged reporting for years exposing this grave injustice—which changed the politics of these January 6th persecutions. Many criminal convictions will almost certainly get tossed after the Supreme Court rules before the end of June. Julie is the driving force.

So much science following!