BillsFanNC

With the Bezos nobody trusts the media op-ed in the news, now is another fine time to check back in with Politico. This story was published on 10/19/2020, just a few weeks before what was to become the most secure election in US history. Since that time the FBI and other reliable media outlets have told us that the laptop is indeed authentic and belonged to Hunter. It was never part of a Russian disinformation campaign. Surely Politico has corrected that reporting in the past four years, right? Let's check: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 Answer: No they have not. I wonder why?

This is the standard according to Roundy and Tibs. Let's hold to our democracy saving anti-MAGA principles and cancel George Lopez, a comedian, for telling a joke. Oh and of course we most hold Kamala and Tampon Tim accountable for what Lopez said at their rally.

A blatant example of outright reliable media lying. This stuff happens constantly. The only thing reliable about the entire game is that useful idiots like Finding, The King and Quack will swallow the lies and defend them. Let me give you an example of how dishonest the Washington Post is. The problem isn't that social media is depriving them of attention, as Bezos suggests. The problem is that they lie. Nothing will change unless they fire everyone and start over. On December 9, 2016, when President Obama announced that he had commissioned an Intelligence Community Assessment to investigate the 2016 election, the Washington Post published an article reporting that the assessment had begun. A few hours later, the Washington Post stealthily edited not only the headline but also the entire article, including the names of its authors. The URL remained unchanged. Suddenly, the Washington Post claimed to know the outcome of the assessment, specifically asserting that Putin had orchestrated Trump's election. Recall that, according to the Washington Post's own reporting just a few hours earlier, the assessment had only just begun. How did this happen? It is almost certain that corrupt intelligence officials were dissatisfied with the original article's straightforward reporting. They needed to preemptively sabotage Trump's presidency, so they ordered the Washington Post to revise the article, this time incorporating the intelligence community's preferred narrative. Despite being aware that the assessment had only just begun, the Washington Post was more than willing to comply. They promoted the intelligence community's narrative, which they knew, at the very least, to be premature and likely recognized to be false. You can see the two different versions of the article below. Please note that these are not two separate articles. One is the original, while the other was inserted in place of the original a few hours later.

Yes. Frankish is Finding Qanon because they/she/it is obsessed with Qanon.

Reliable

Don't tell Finding!

You answered your own question.

⬆️ Did you buy low King?

Imagine starting a thread about a "ballot counting timeline" in 2024. Imagine being The King.

This is how it works, right? We post updates when highly volatile equities move big?

Proof of fraud in 2020 is everywhere. Deranged useful idiots parroting their media masters mantra that 2020 was the most secure election in US history while also still believing that 2016 Russia collusion is real tells you everything. If you are giving these morons the time of day then you're doing it wrong.

Im sticking with the prediction I've been making for four years. Trump will never be POTUS again. The regime simply will not give up power. If it takes even more blatant out in the open cheating and rigging they will absolutely do it without hesitation. Whatever it takes. No holds barred.

Wait, so the corporate media are reliable propagandists? No friggin way.

Classic thread title from the guy who has openly admitted to NEVER voting. Not once. In its life. Not even for local dog catcher.

⬆️ Hoax