BillsFanNC

Only a biologist can know. Only OUR biologists that can know.

My "agenda" is that we have a human being who has numerous physical male characteristics dominating world class female boxers while also being under suspension by an international governing body because of a reported male xy karyotype that for some reason there was no repeat test performed when offered. Again, that's what we KNOW right now. And you're rejecting all of that as zero evidence while accusing me of harboring bias. Look in the mirror.

Are you an international governing body capable of banning individuals from competing based on your statement alone? Or would you need a test to back up your statement? And if an individual appealed your decision, was offered to get another test and then withdrew their appeal what might that tell you? When East German women were obviously doping in the 80s were we ever shown their test results? All of the above is evidence. Its circumstantial evidence that you don't like. Not very compelling.

Whatever. Lost

He was banned by an international boxing authority for having an XY karyotype. He appealed the ruling and could have been re-tested. Then he withdrew the appeal. That's what we know. You saying there's zero proof doesn't make the above go away. Get tested by an agreed upon lab with proper oversight is a really simple way to get beyond this and validate "her" gold medal. And even if you don't understand the myriad of genetic tests outlined in the X thread posted above as I do.... There's always the friggin eye test. I think they should do an SRY gene test as this is the master switch in male development. Doesn't matter if he has a uterus or what his passport says, if you have that gene then you're going to develop male characteristics and make it completely unfair to compete against XX women who do not have the SRY gene.

A fellow biologist, who we've been repeatedly told are the only ones qualified to weigh in on this issue, gives a great recap of the history of genetic sex testing. Try to follow (along with) the science.

There's a karyotype that says he has XY chromosomes. Other than that you're absolutely right. Zero proof.

When they turn the pages of history When these days have passed long ago Will they read of us with sadness For the seeds that we let grow? Cities full of hatred, fear and lies Withered hearts and cruel tormented eyes Scheming demons dressed in kingly guise Beating down the multitude and scoffing at the wise

1. It's not happening 2. It's happening, but it's inconsequential 3. It's happening and it's a good thing and you should embrace it. Same narrative progression. Every. Single. Time It's almost as if we have the history of Marxist revolutions to guide us.

Now imagine if Tucker asked Trump if he had to choose being stuck in an elevator with either Biden, Kamala or Pelosi and his answer was: Does one of us have to come out alive? Defcon 1 in the reliable media.

Found 4th&long X account

🎯