BillsFanNC

Precisely why the democrats can so easily get everyone in lockstep. They're all useful idiot drones like Quack.

I'd put it at 10% honest mistake and 90% nefarious "mistake" Of all the journalists that could have been mistakenly added to a sensitive chat it is Russia, Russia, Russia, suckers & losers, Iraq WMD hoaxer Goldberg?

Weird

Look at Quack with the 0.001 chance hypotheticals! An absolute clown.

They're hunkered down with the virologists.

1. Accidently inviting a reporter to a signal chat about a military operation that ended up being successful in every way? Fire everyone! The reporter once he realized that he was mistakenly invited to the sensitive chat dealing with a military operation began taking screen shots instead of leaving immediately by the way. So there's that. 2. Purposely telling the world about a hard deadline for evacuation from Afghanistan to end our two decade presence there that ended in a complete and total disaster in every way, including thirteen dead Marines? That was a success. Why would anyone be held accountable for such a success? We should be giving out promotions and medals.

Communist? Pro-Palestine? You don't say. Next you'll tell us that he is a climate change, DEI and trans activist as well. All different fingers of the same commie fist.

This morning, @JoshKraushaar ran a hit piece against me in Jewish Insider, which has become an anti-JD rag. It has many problems, including seven anonymous quotes from cowardly Republicans. But the most glaring factual error is the below, which says the Houthis killed three Americans last January. Actually, the group responsible for that attack was "Islamic Resistance in Iraq," which is an entirely different militia group. Now, you might say this is evidence of Kraushaar being the biggest hack in Washington, and you *may* be correct. Another very plausible explanation is that he's the dumbest journalist in Washington. Either way, shocking an error like this could get through his vaunted editorial process!