BillsFanNC

😂 Finding! No one is trying to convince you of anything Finding. It's a pointless exercise. Because you're a useful idiot. Indictments are coming. No one is above the law. Enjoy!

This thread?

⬆️ Bullstojan! 😂

And right to the wood paneling glory hole!

Finding! 😂 Dutifully regurgitating reliable media. Shocking! But that would look awfully bad for Charlie Savage, who has dutifully carried water for the Russia hoax for the past decade. So, in an article and accompanying post last night, Savage downplayed the emails and falsely claimed Durham had “decided they were fakes made by Russian spies.” The problem is, that’s not what Durham concluded at all. Durham certainly never said the emails were fabricated, and in fact said he couldn’t tell for sure. He said his office was unable to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence] … was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.” Moreover, Durham’s team interviewed U.S. intelligence personnel who were “well-versed” in the matter, and they testified that their “best assessment was that the Benardo emails were likely authentic.” Savage dismisses this because these interviews happened early in Durham’s investigation. Durham also says that the CIA “prepared a written assessment of the authenticity and veracity of the above-referenced intelligence.” His description of their conclusion contains redactions, but it appears to say the CIA “stated that it did not assess that the above … memoranda … [were] the product of Russian fabrications.” In his report, Durham also noted contemporaneous events that lent credence to the claim that Clinton had approved the plan. “On July 29, 2016 — three days after the purported approval of the Clinton Plan intelligence — Michael Sussmann and Marc Elias, the General Counsel to the Clinton campaign, met with Fusion GPS personnel in Elias’s office at Perkins Coie,” Durham noted. Fusion GPS was the firm that hired Christopher Steele to cook up the Steele dossier. Also notable: Just days before the purported email alleging Clinton’s “approval” of the plan, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook was floating the claim to Jake Tapper that the Russians were meddling in the election “for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump” — which would become a central claim of the Russia collusion hoax. Savage and his co-author and fellow Russiagate truther Adam Goldman rely heavily on two things to claim the purported Benardo emails are fake. First, they point to a line in the annex in which Durham says his “best assessment” is that the purported Benardo emails “were ultimately a composite of several emails,” which is obviously not the same thing as saying he thought the Russians completely made them up. Second, they rely on denials from the Clinton campaign. But they also represent those inaccurately. Savage and Goldman say Benardo “told Mr. Durham in 2021 that he had never seen the message and did not write it.” If you actually read the annex, Durham says, “Benardo stated that, to the best of his recollection, he did not draft the emails” but that “the last sentence in the email … sounded like something he would have said.”

Much remains hidden, but we know of at least three unreleased items which would further expose the treasonous nature of the operation against Trump: 1. Danchenko’s CHS Status: By January 12, 2017, the FBI had already decided to conceal Igor Danchenko’s existence by making him a confidential human source. This was before they ever even talked to him. What exactly happened behind the scenes? And why did they used the word “convert,” as if Danchenko was already working for them in some other capacity? 2. Missing Strzok Texts: We were led to believe we’ve seen all of Peter Strzok’s incriminating messages plotting the coup against Trump but months of texts from early 2017 are missing. That was when the FBI was hiding Danchenko, ignoring his disavowal of the dossier, lying to Congress about Steele, plotting to remove Flynn, and setting up a fraudulent special counsel operation. 3. Mark Lyall Grant Memo: This is a reported warning from the UK government, sent by National Security Adviser Mark Lyall Grant, supposedly flagging the Steele material as fraudulent. The memo was allegedly sent by Grant to Gen. Flynn but he never received it. Where is it and what does it say?

RoundyMao with another epic massive L. Big Balls age = 19. Teenager.

Your rules! Sorry!

Oh she knew it She's relying on useful idiots not knowing it.

Inspiration for this thread ..

⬆️ Nedboi! 😂

She wasn't supposed to lose. This whole operation is never exposed if Hillary wins like 98% of planet earth thought she would. But she didn't win, thus forcing the clean up operation via the same corrupt liars, their reliable media lackeys and useful idiots to try and squelch the obvious. It didn't work.