IDBillzFan

I don't make chump bets cuz I ain't no chump. Back to my actual point; are you of the mind that having a single presidential campaign office in Florida is the correct thing to do? If so, please explain why. Spare me the cult-of-personality stuff. Bring the numbers. Break down the counties. Let's hear it.

And so it goes... Mother of 5-year-old transgender child says gender-neutral bathrooms are not good enough. You see, her child knew at 3 that he was a she, and the school that her child will attend as a kindergartner has a policy to provide gender-neutral bathrooms, so it should not be an issue. But it is, because to paraphrase Tod Higgins, you need a license to drive, a license to fish and a license to own a dog, but they'll let any butt-reaming asssssshole be a parent.

Okay...you need to back away from the keyboard because there is no universe where anyone should think Romney is really a Democrat who tanked an election to let Barry have a second term...but somehow also think Donald Trump is a legitimate Republican businessman. And before you get crazy, I'm not defending Romney. I'm pointing out the incredible irony of your statement. It's stunning. By the way...THIS is how you take a dive. One office in Florida? ONE? Why, it's like Florida isn't important at all.

When I'm not pointing out all the ridiculously stupid questions and comments you've posted here, I'm usually waiting and waiting and waiting for you to link to the stories you said existed from January that covered the WH paying the $400M hostage ransom to Iran. But lately I'm having fun watch you unapologetically make embarrassing excuses for a money-laundering, lying, incompetent former SoS who somehow thinks leaving four Americans for dead in Benghazi is just an imaginary oddity in the minds of the victims' families, all while giving a front row campaign seat to the father of a Muslim Democrat who murdered 49 homosexuals.

Now branching out to making ridiculously stupid statemtents. It's good to diversify. Tell me, were you this apologetic for Bush back when you were one of them crazy Republicans?

Is your whole reason to be on this board to simply post ridiculously stupid questions? Because if it is, I have to admit, you're very good at it. You're not very smart, not even the slightest bit, but damn, you can ask ridiculously stupid questions with the best of them.

Sean Hannity takes it in the piehole for Trump.

Hell, if only the GOP candidate was a Republican...

This single sentence blows up any possibility that you have ever been anything other than a far-left progressive your entire freaking life. And further to GG's point above, please break down the numbers for us on what single payer would cost that would make it cheaper. Cheaper for who? How much cheaper? Wait. Let me guess. It would be cheaper because it would be 'free,' right?

Congress floods WH with demands for info on $400M payoff to Iran. Maybe the WH will hire baskin as press secretary to show everyone the stories about this pay-for-hostage deal in January. Oh, wait. They can't because there WERE NO stories back then.

In a nutshell. If Trump would stop saying stupid stuff and ask the media about the issues with Hillary, maybe they'd probe it more. But your last line is the truth. Then why not refer to the 'evangelical" or 'pro-life' people? Because he meant what he meant. He thinks he's on a TV show and can say what he wants. He's undisciplined, and it's embarrassing. He's the Billy Joe Hobert of the GOP. And you know the worst part, at least for me? I spent more time than I cared defending a RINO like McCain (up until his mortgage bailout plan) and I tried even harder to defend Romney because the stuff he would get beat up on, like "binders full of women," was just the left being the left. But now I find myself, sadly, joining a chorus of leftist people whose ideology and company I simply can not stand, simply because Trump is, without question, the worst candidate I have ever seen pretend to be a conservative. Suddenly I'm not just ignoring, but I'm actually mocking Chris Christie, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingram, Bill O'Reilly, Breitbart, Drudge, etc. because it's all just too embarrassing to watch.

Simply, but truthfully, stated again by Ben Shapiro.

You write this as if everyone should be surprised by this revelation. He KNOWs. In fact, EVERYONE knows. So why not at least TRY a little harder? Because he can't. And he can't because he doesn't want to. And the worst part? Hillary should be asked to explain Mateen's father at her rally and about being sued by parents of two Benghazi victims, but what is all over the news cycle? Trump being a dumbass. Again.

Trump today per CNN: I think you almost have to believe that Trump is doing everything he can to destroy what is left of the GOP and get Hillary elected president i the biggest landslide ever. It's just not conceivable that any human being running for president on the GOP ticket could be THIS phucking stupid. Remember these moments, Trump Davidians, because when Hillary gets a landslide, and takes the House and Senate with her, we know you'll want to blame someone other than Trump, but you've put your weight behind a completely and utter moron.

Alot of that album was pre-SNL people. I think it was a National Lampoon album. I remember Bill Murray as the DJ hosting a call-a-thon to raise money for the radio station, and refusing to play any music until someone made a donation. "That is. If you're not going to donate money, I'm just not going to play any music, okay? How do you like that?" There was also an Olympic bit with a man and woman announcer explaining Nadia Comenici. "And look at that dismount! Man, I'd like to phuck her!" "Well, I'm no lesbian, Bob, but..."

Do people pay you to come out of the basement to post about Bush?

Also, gun show loopholes and automatic weapons.

Actually the difference is that Trump is a walking, breathing, lying Democrat embarrassment who provides more than enough food for the media to throw on everyone. If the establishment is willing to get behind a committed Democrat like Trump, they'd do the same for Cruz no matter what. In the end, Cruz would debate circles around Hillary while Trump, I'm sure, will do a terrific job talking about the lastest story in the National Enquirer about Hillary's hairpiece.

Do you genuinely believe they're cooking the polls? Fox News has Trump down by 10. You think they're cooking the polls after turning itself into the Trump News Network?

It reminds me of this old Mr. Rogers routine interviewing a bass player (Bill Murray). Eggamuffin.

Fixed this for you. It cuts both ways. Thinking its okay to support Trump because he just isn't as bad as Hillary is like saying you are okay taking birdog seriously because he isn't as stupid as gatorman.

Now, now, it's going to take years to untangle his motive. We shouldn't jump to conclusions.

Completely agree. It reminds the reverse effect we some from Trump yelling about Obama's birth certificate. Hey, waaaaaait a minute... Yeah, I'd be curious to know the answer to this question as well.

Maybe he can help the FBI find his daughter in law.

You're really not kidding? Let me ask you this: She is proven to have used a personal server for all correspondence while SoS, making classified emails easily hackable from pretty much anyone with a laptop. She lied under oath to Congress, and even the FBI director embarrassingly stated that she lied, and that if she were anyone else, she'd be indicted. She has proven to launder foreign funds to get a uranium deal for Russia. She handed Libya over to the terrorists, and I didn't even have to bring up the four people her department left for dead in Benghazi before lying to America, and in particular the families of the victims, about what happened. You're okay with all this? You're "with her?" This is acceptable behavior for your president? Note: this is a yes or no question.