IDBillzFan

Really? Tell everyone...what has been settled?

Interestingly, all he was doing was repeating the same simplistic, embarrassing "I have the only argument because there is no other argument, so I wiped the floor with everyone" approach, while you, at lest, offered a look into the future.

Grant, you freaking tool, how do you write this... and when asked what my position is, you then write this? Are you intentionally this stupid or does it just happen by accident?

What is my position?

Dollar Tree Responds To LA Grants Calls For Gun Control I think he's speaking for the majority of Americans who agree with him. Which apparently has been reduced to gatorman/tiberius/baskin/busey and a guy who thinks too many people will cause Guam to tip over.

The only way his rhetoric works is by comparing it to how he twisted your rhetoric to be not what you said.

I like how he would TOTALLY be open to debate... except that he already knows the position you will take is wrong...even before you make it...because it's different from his position. And his position is the ONLY position that makes sense, even though he hasn't heard your position! Tolerance!

I was trying to use simple words so Grant and busey could follow along.

You've already poisoned the well by explaining that there is no counter argument to your beliefs. If you won't hear counter arguments, then how to do expect to find solutions that are different from your own? Simply put, you can't. Or as you stated earlier... But hey, you keep pretending you are willing to listen. You've managed to get Tasker this far.

USA Today: Only 13 people used the NRA discount to fly Delta.

Most people aren't defending the NRA. They're defending the 2A. The reason it feels like they're defending the NRA is because the left, being devoid of any real discussion, personifies gun ownership as the big, bad, disgusting, horrific NRA. Very simple, basic DNC arguing 101: pick your battle, give it a face, yell at the face instead of the subject. When you're just about to lose, yell how there is no known argument against whatever the DNC is whining about today.

Unfortunately, this is the flaw in your entire post. You want to make concessions, but you also admit it really won't do anything. Everyone knows this. Even the left. They don't want to restrict more guns to save lives. They want to restrict more guns because they trust the government over the individual. They must have the government in charge of everything because they are unable to take care of themselves. This is why they piss on ideas of self-accountability and self-responsibility. They NEED the government to run all things. Subsequently, you don't make concessions just to make them stop crying. You fight back with options that WILL make a difference. The problem, as LA Grant repeatedly states, is that they are not interested in your ideas. Only their own. As he stated, and most leftists agree, there is no argument against more gun control, so just shut up and give them the guns.

Not all people. Just those who are either too stupid or unwilling to understand it. I mistakenly thought the meltdown would have ended by now, but he keeps spinning them up and they keep getting spun up, and if we have to have Trump for dinner, I am grateful he comes with a show. Why, it's almost like Trump was a lifelong Democrat who decided to switch parties when he saw an opportunity to market himself. Gee, if only someone realized that earlier.

You mean like Guam?

He's already told you why. There is no logical argument against gun control. The science is settled. There is only one truth: Global warming cooling climate change gun control must take place, and to deny it means you value product over children's lives.

I'm pretty sure Georgia thought about this long and hard. Delta doesn't just "move its hub."

And herein lies the reason you find yourself alone in your arguments: "no logically sound counter-argument exists..." That's the anti-2A equivalent of "The science is settled." Maybe instead of gun control you should call it global cooling warming climate gun change.

The people who engage you are incredibly patient, able to drill down into your arguments so that even Stevie Wonder can see how unbelievably bad they are. I don't have that kind of patience, but calling you out for misdirecting the conversation for the sake of looking smart? Easy pickings.

You could randomly drop a pile of dogschitt from 12,000 feet and have it land closer to his point than you did. It would appear you have decided that since you are unable to make your case, you'll try to make his case in a manner that makes it appear like you make sense. I can't tell if you're that creative or that !@#$ stupid. I'm thinking you ain't very creative.

I'm no pollster or political junkie, but I've said it before; Trump didn't win. Hillary lost. Trump appealed to the people who were forgotten in the previous eight years by an administration that chose its base over the country. Whatever you want to think about Obama, he absolutely pissed all over everyone not considered his base. Bitter clingers, etc. He hated cops and make no effort to hide it. He hated the military, and made no effort to hide it. He played to his base all day, everyday. Now factor in that Hillary was, far and away, the single worst candidate running the single worst campaign I had ever seen, and I genuinely thought John McCain would hold that belt for years. So she won precisely and only what was left after eight years of Obama: the base. Elite liberals in uber-rich cities and states. He didn't win. She lost.

It's almost like Trump was a life-long Democrat who simply change party affiliation to run for office. Gee. If only someone saw that coming.

It won't happen any time soon because their sponsors have the biggest megaphone.

Leftist snowflakes to the rescue!

It's hard to say, really. Gatorman's idiocy is basically a natural talent. He can post one or two sentences and it's clear. These other guys, on the other hand, work harder at their craft. They craft long, seemingly pointless posts that shift topics, argue against points of view no one shared, and then cast blame at everyone for not understanding that their idiocy is really a special kind of intelligence only few other idiots can grasp. So, the money's on gatorman, but man, these other guys really put in the time to take the belt away.

Are you suggesting that if the age to buy a gun was raised to 21, the killer in Parkland would have just, y'know, waited a few years?