IDBillzFan

Damn, that terrorist sure makes a lot of money showing up all over DC.

No. The "You're a hypocrite card." The left often gets those confused, so don't take it personally. Let me known when you've listened to statements from Karen Monahan or Jaunita Brodderick and said "They sound credible. I believe them."

I've wonder a lot lately who or what will come to unify the right. Never genuinely dawned on me it would be the left. Plus there is the added benefit of the right flushing out fake conservatives. When this is done, I suspect we'll wake up in a few months to find out about a new MSNBC podcast called "Conservative Voices, With Jennifer Rubin and Bill Kristol."

Trump's base elected Bill Clinton? Weird.

I can't believe how much worse RBG looks in just two years from that article. She can barely keep her head up anymore.

Be careful what you ask for, as you will surely get it.

I believe she was even asked if there was anything else she wanted to add or talk about and she said 'no.' When the committee asked for her other documents this week, they refused to turn them over. There is no mistaking that Grassley has bent over backwards to ensure that Ford was given every single opportunity she needed. The GOP can't help it if the Dems sat on her allegation for almost two months. Imagine what kind of investigation could have happened if they simply brought it up when they found out. But no. Time to vote. Time to confirm.

There is an entire thread dedicated to the health care discussion here, so I'm sure we should keep that discussion isolated, but I can't let this go: one of THE primary selling points of Obamacare was that it was going to reduce annual health insurance costs, on average, $2500 per year. The promise was never to get it to $20K a year for everyone since we were well on our way to that number already. THAT is revisionist history. It's like arguing that yes, Obama said if you like your doctor, you could keep your doctor, but if you lost your doctor, that must mean you didn't like your doctor.

Wherever you are on Thursday, walk out. Yeah. Good plan.

This isn't my usual fare of posting in terms of getting JoeSixPack aggressive, but it's time to confirm Kavanaugh, share this info with the country, and release the hounds of hell on the vile pigs of the DNC. Does anyone know if federal prisoners get a walker to help them around the prison grounds? Do the guards help the older prisoners down a flight of stairs? Asking for a friend.

Nothing in this entire nomination has been even remotely as egregious as what the left did to Dr. Ford. They used her...and continue to use her...as a pawn in their attempt to divide the country, and in the process they took the concerns of a woman who believes she was sexually assaulted, and they shelved her concerns until it was politically expedient for the Dems. That's the single most disgusting part of this entire event, and the fastest way to tell someone who is all about ideology is how quickly they tell you that Kavanaugh is the problem here. I hope they confirm Kavanaugh as quickly as possible, and then run ad after ad of how DiFi betrayed Ford, and how Dem staffers put Senators in danger by doxxing them, and how all these nutbags tried to destroy the Kavanaugh family as they casually discard of Dr. Ford like they did with every other Cindy Sheehan they rape for their own advantage. Mid terms can't come soon enough. I hope the left gets obliterated for the horrible fate they cast for Dr. Ford and Kavanaugh.

People are welcome to form opinions, but to keep Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court for one person's uncorroborated claims, regardless of how many people form an opinion based exclusively on her testimony, would be an absolute travesty that will hurt many people for many years. Trump's comments notwithstanding, she made a singular claim and we're about to find out if it has been corroborated or proven. If it can't, Kavanaugh should be confirmed. It's just that simple.

You may find her more believable in tone, but have you reviewed the extensive list of inaccuracies in her story; not the least of which everyone she referenced to corroborate her story specifically could not do so? They are very clear and very telling, and anyone who objectively reviews them can clearly tell the difference between she 'sounds' believable and she 'is' to be believed. I'd start with the report written by the prosecutor, and then follow it up with this article from USA Today. Dig beyond what your heard from her. It's all in this thread.

GoFundMe and media rounds at MSNBC, CNN, ABC, etc. Easiest six figures you'll ever make.

Well done, leftists. Let that racist spirit fly high!

Interesting read...especially for USA Today.

If you just throw them on ignore, you'd be surprised how much more readable the conversation becomes.

I agree. This cartoonist is totally human garbage.

Eat a Snickers. You're not yourself when you're tired. No worry. I know you're not like this.

Boof? Devil's Triangle? You think THAT was him perjuring himself? That's ridiculous. Just ridiculous. And for the record, if you think THAT is perjury, you're gonna hate the polygraph lie that Ford told. But her you believe. Yeah. You don't have a side here.

What's disgusting is DiFi and the Dems sitting on a accusation by a woman who says she was sexually assaulted. They sat on it for weeks, and promised not to release her information, right before they used it politically to smear Kavanaugh and leak her information to the public. You literally CAN"T side with her, puke on the GOP for their tactics, and sound credible.

We're not talking about people who have called him out. You accused him of perjury. I'm asking you to be more specific. And while we're at it, why is it you want to believe college acquaintances of his but you ignore her same acquaintances who say they have no idea what she's talking about? She doesn't know where. She doesn't know when. She doesn't know whose house or what year or if there were four guys or three guys and a girl. She literally has changed her story five or six times, NO ONE can corroborate her story, and yet you believe her and not him. Why is that? But first, specifics about the perjury. When did he perjure himself under oath?

Where did he lie about his past under oath?

This "clown" is highly qualified, actually. Even by Dem standards. We're supposed to toss him to the side because a woman who has not told one corroborated truth about being sexually assaulted by him? A woman who tonight is found to possibly have perjured herself? Or is it suddenly that he drinks? Maybe you'd feel better if he and his drinking buddies had a cool name. Like Choom Gang or something. Get over it, TB. Dude is qualified, he's getting confirmed, and you keep lining up people to lie about him and we'll see what that gets your party. All she's done is tell stories people SHE referred as witnesses can not corroborate. Wanting this to be true doesn't make it true.

You mad, bro? You seem mad? Be patient. He'll be confirmed in no time, and THEN they'll try to find someone more to your liking when RBG hangs it up next year.