Darin does have a point here. It is a little difficult to debate someone who regurgitates sound bites. Any mainstream news source (albeit TV, newspapers, internet) is going to be biased and is going to slant the news to gain the most readership/viewership. If you want to know what is truly going on in the world, you need to look outside of the mainstream press.
Frankly, Darin cannot debate you on this, because you have not shown that you are:
1) willing to hear other POV’s
2) willing to listen with an open mind
3) have an honest debate without using the typical sound bites you get from the political parties.
While I felt that the war was just, I did not support it for the reasons given by the administration. There were plenty of other reasons for going to war (violation of Resolution 687, repeated violations of subsequent resolutions which specifically state that Iraq is in violation of 687 including the terrorism clause, humanitarian reasons, etc). According to the Deulfer Report, the inspections were not working and the sanctions were not working. Implementation and enforcement of the no-fly zones was illegal. Other than military actions, what other solutions would you suggest when all of the other options failed?