-
Posts
6,737 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by KRC
-
Notable Nexflix / Amazon / Premium Channel Series & Movies
KRC replied to Heitz's topic in Off the Wall
If you are into the history of exploration, there is "Trajectory - Milestones in Space Exploration" on Prime. Short stories of major items in space history. For a space geek like me, it is a mixed bag. It is great that you can get the stories of these moments in history. However, each one is only about 5-8 minutes in length, so they do not go into too much detail. Good for people with ADD, but not good if you are looking for deep dives. -
Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread
KRC replied to snafu's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
After seeing the impeachment proceedings from both sides, yup, I definitely want those people running my healthcare. -
We haven't had a good plague in a while. Friggin Trump.
-
Still more diverse than the Democrat debate stage.
-
-
The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump
KRC replied to Nanker's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Damn you!! Now I want cake. -
You don't believe in getting rid of a breed?
-
After we get rid of Pits, we take out German Shepherds. Then we get rid of Dobermans and Rotties. Then we get down to Mastiffs as the worst. Got to get rid of them. Eventually, they will all be gone as the worst need to be eliminated as we go down the list. Eugenics is fun!!
-
Nice echo chamber.
-
-
You have to think of the things that are important to you. That is different from person to person. For me, I would want to see career path. What are the chances for advancement? What are the chances to take on new and exciting opportunities? I would also want to look at corporate culture and how I would fit into that culture. Remember, you are interviewing them just as much as they are interviewing you. Make that clear that you want to make sure that not only are you looking to see if you are a good fit for the position, but if you are a good fit for their culture. What is the work environment like? How do the workers look as they walk you around the facility? Do they look stressed? Too much slacking off? What are the conditions of the facility? Does it look like they maintain it or are they letting it go? If they do not take care of the facilities, they probably do not take care of the employees. Since I am currently in management, if it is a public company, I would review their 10-K to see the financial health of the company and how they spend their money. I would also use it to ask more probing questions on the financial health of the company and their financial strategies. You do not want to get into a company if management is making bad financial decisions or if it looks like they are in bad financial shape. I would look at online reviews from people who have worked there. Obviously, this will be slanted towards the negative as people who have a negative view are more apt to voice their opinions than those with a positive experience. You can weed through that, but if you see recurring themes, that could be a red flag. Don't be afraid to ask them the tough questions. In the end, you have to look out for yourself. It may sound selfish, but the company is always going to do what is best for the company, not necessarily what is best for you. Make sure it is the right fit for you, otherwise, you could be very unhappy and will be looking for another job in the near future.
-
-
-
What is better, no guns, or more guns?
KRC replied to Security's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
What is better, no guns, or more guns?
KRC replied to Security's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Sounds like him. -
The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency
KRC replied to Nanker's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Holy hell. What word can we use to describe people more delicate than snowflakes? -
Occasi-Cortez Channeling the Rent's too damn high guy
KRC replied to bdutton's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
He doesn't? -
World War IV!!!!
-
Tax cuts (Trump) versus tax increases (Dems). Hmmm...Hard to choose which way to go here.
-
Slater and Speedie deserve it. Wistert and Dilweg should have been the other pre-1960 guys over Sprinkle. Good to see Young make it, but McNally should have been picked over Tags. Parker and Shaughnessey should have been selected over Cower and Johnson.
-
This is how many times we have had WWIII under Trump? I lose track.
-
Ed was already in. People were wondering if Steve would also make it in claiming he did essentially the same thing. Steve took it to another level, so arguments can be made of his own contributions. I better see Dilweg and Wistert (maybe Speedie) to also make it, but I doubt they will focus that much on the older players. Slater and Sprinkle are the token old guys. THe rest will be recent players.