Jump to content

HamSandwhich

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HamSandwhich

  1. 1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

    When you say "more secure border" what do you mean? I don';t see immigration as a threat. Why does the right need to make it seem so scary that we take in immigrants? 

    You don’t see people unfettered streaming across a border a threat? We don’t know who they are? You’re ok if there is sex trafficking happening, if there are drugs coming across, if there are any people wanting to do us harm coming across? You’re ok without borders at all? I am against that, it does not = great replacement theory like you’re trying to say. I’m not saying I don’t like it because I think my race is better than theirs, and that’s the big difference. My focus is on how it’s bad for the country to not know who is coming across. 

  2. 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Ah yes, the legacy media in concert with the message. See, you’re proving my point. Conflate everything with replacement theory on the right.

     

    What is great replacement theory, I’d like to hear what you think it is. It’s a very specific thing. No, the republicans don’t believe in it, just because you want a more secure border does not mean you believe in replacement theory. 

  3. 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    What are you babbling about? 

    There is someone babbling, but it’s not me. The great replacement theory has nothing to do with legitimate grievances in polices such as open borders and taking issues with it. The great replacement theory is specific to the thought that people are replacing the white race, none of which the majority of republicans believe or any Fox News personality believes. The disinformation on the left to paint all republicans as complicit is bs and what you’re trying to spread with your comments. Disinformation at its best. 

  4. 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Oh BS. Black supremicists? Ok. 

     

    You just sound upset racists are being called out for what they are 

    He is an avowed black supremicists, if you’ve ever seen his YouTube videos that have now been taken down. It’s not even a question. 
     

    The white supremicists narriative is overblown to the point of hysteria. Are there white supremicists in the country? Yes. Are they as prevalent as the left says they are? Much like police statistics are overblown by the left, the white supremicist infiltration is overblown. It’s all political. The left is now trying to ascribe great replacement theory they guy (who hates republicans and Fox News in his manifesto) was espousing to any grievance against the way we are policing the border or how we think voting policy should be in regards to illegal immigrants. That’s not the great replacement theory, that’s just politics. They are trying to pin this all on the republicans but the American people are tired of this bs, they saw this happen with the word “racist” and how the left made all republicans racist, they see through this. Dems think this a Roe will be a wedge issue that will turn November around to disgusting attempts to divide this country, and it won’t work. Americans know better. Watch. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 32 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

    Well, that's really well said.  Thanks.  

     

    I think it's true, too.  I think a lot of people would stand up for the country.  And contrary to what someone has suggested, I suspect that those on the left would respond as well as those on the right.  

     

    The real point of my question is if we'd all stand together to defend our country, if we'd all cooperate to protect our country, why is it that in these times we're fighting so viciously on the political front?  We're tearing ourselves apart.  The unwritten promise that was made among Americans at the beginning of our country was that we would cooperate to keep those things that we hold dear.   Not cooperate only when threatened with conquest; cooperate to preserve our ideals for all of us. 

    I touched on it in my original post. We are so fortunate in this country, we have had no real threats to us from the outside. We’ve been able to ruminate on issues and blow them up to more than they need to be. That’s how we get to “micro aggressions” being a thing. Something that is based on bias and not something that is not premeditated, something our mind does as a way to survive in a world that sends us stimulus from all angles, is being turned into a tell that people are racist. We are eating ourselves from the inside because we are so protected, humans innately need conflict (in my opinion). 

  6. 1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

    Was that officially a domestic terrorist event? 

     

    Wakusha was not determined to be, there are politics at play with this democratic justice department. I’m sure it was terrorizing for those being run over, wasn’t it? 
     

    What about the black supremicists who shot up people in the subway recently? Was Biden there to talk about black supremacy or how his race baiting from him and his administration is a direct cause if the standard they are putting Republicans to is to stand? 
     

    This is disgusting race baiting by the administration. They are picking a choosing based on the narrative, creating a moral panic directed at one race. Does he think increasing the heat against whiteness is going to cause less of these instances?? 

  7. On 5/15/2022 at 2:46 AM, Warcodered said:

    I mean it was clearly motivated by racism that's really not in dispute.

    Yep, in one persons twisted mind, not the mind of all republicans as the media wnd left wing politics want to paint it. 

    4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

     

    What? You are saying that only 990 people were shot by cops in the last 3 and a half years? 

    Race baiting at its finest. I’m sure he blamed it on the Ultra Maga. Where was this visit in other mass shootings Locke Wakusha Christmas parade where kids were mowed down? What’s that you say? The skin color of tbe aggressor didn’t match his fear mongering? Oh I see. 

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. I told my wife the other day, she is 6 months pregnant with our 3rd boy, that if push came to shove, and our country was threatened (especially if it was close proximity to my family) I would 100% take up arms to protect her, the family, and the country I love. She said “I know”. 
     

    This country, with all of its blemishes is still far and away the greatest and most free country on the planet. It’s the most excepting of all countries, despite what you hear in the news. If there was an invading force trying to take over the country, I think a large majority of able body men would fight. All creed, race, age, etc would come together and fight proudly together, much like what is reported to be happening in Ukraine. It’s easy to bicker and fight when times are good but when push comes to shove, America would defend itself vigorously, and I’d be proud to die for our freedoms, for my  l wife and sons freedoms,  and my fellow Americans pursuit of happiness without hesitation. 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  9. 9 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

    It's a good slapstick watch and he at least gets the info correct when he does it instead of just going off of what the media is saying. 

    He sometimes tries to hard but overall it’s enjoyable and get a couple of chuckles along the way. 

  10. 2 hours ago, MPL said:

    That's Good Sports is a great channel. His weekly recaps are generally pretty entertaining. He's a Broncos fan so he hates the Chiefs... which has made him a Bills fan by default. 

    Agreed, like to watch him during the season. 

  11. 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    Which is why we should definitely use the power of the State of Florida to silence Disney.

    These people are so hermetically sealed into their Tuckerverse that they can't see how contradictory their posts are.

    At some point we you gotta beat them at their own game. Rest assured, the republicans will cease control when they wrangle the communist authoritarianism lust from the Dems and put them in their place. Gotta break them down from the inside. Certainly not something Dems would do, they want to grow their power and keep control by any means necessary. 

    • Haha (+1) 1
  12. 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    And on a related topic:

    Today I just learned that the U.S. trucking industry is built on a tech infrastructure of roads and bridges that are built or highly subsidized by the U.S. government!

     

    Allow me to stop and let that sink in ...

     

    ... O.K.. I'm done. It seems like the government builds infrastructure that private companies then use by creating profitable enterprises.

     

    (The cut-and-pasted comment above is perhaps the stupidest Musk/Twitter take yet)

     

    Not a good take at all. Terrible argument. Last I knew the roads don’t control speech. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...