-
Posts
3,079 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by HamSandwhich
-
-
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:
And you think Democrats have made gas prices higher?
1 million percent
-
29 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:
Can't. No invitro allowed😀😉
Chances are increasing, but at least you can't vape yourself to death with Juul.😉
Can we determine political preferences, may change some people's decision on anti/pro position.😉
Still no answers, just trying to avoid the question. There is a hell of a lot of catching up to do to catch nearly 💯 of those who are aborted die. Also, you can be pro-life for babies AND pro-life for kids in classes, I disagree with the issue. It’s all about mental illness but you probably don’t want to discuss the actual issue.
-
3 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:
Not being able to afford gasoline isn't a catastrophe. A used up word is a catastrophe.
"...Blessed are the poor
For they shall inherit the Earth
Better to be poor than a fat man in the eye of a needle
As these words were spoken I swear
I hear the old man laughing
"What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having?..."But really... It took you 4 years to craft a reply. 😏...
It is to the average person, but you do t care see. When people have to choose between dinner and rent, that is a catastrophe for that person, isn’t it? Who cares about them. Gas prices increase everything, so stop acting like it only effects gas prices. EVERYTHING has gone up exponentially, you ignore that, voters won’t and it’s a MUCH bigger issue than abortion, not even close. That’s why this roe issue will not register, those who were pro choice were going to vote democrat anyway.
-
32 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Just shut up. You make no sense and just blather out whatever hits the back of your head
Lol it hurts when you get called out? He’s not wrong, the logical conclusion to this ridiculousness is tribalism.
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Guns are a leading cause of death of children. Right?
Dancing bear are you? Dancing around the question?
-
14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Oh, so you are pro-life but suicides shouldn't count? What?
Selectively pro-life?
You’re changing the subject and putting words in my mouth. There’s also a very big distinction between someone tragically making a decision to take their own life and a person who can’t make a decision on their own (the baby).
Answer the question. The person I was responding to was equivocating morals with abortions vs shootings in school. It’s also a dumb equivocation as being for gun rights does not make you ok with school shootings in the least. Simple minded people like yourself will shout that to the moon like you’re virtuous but are actually the complete opposite.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Guns are now the leading cause of death among young people in the U.S.
For decades, car crashes were the leading cause of death for Americans ages 1 to 19. But the gap between car crash deaths and firearms deaths began to steadily narrow in recent years. In 2020, gun violence overtook car accidents to become the No. 1 cause of death for U.S. children and adolescents.
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/28/1101307932/texas-shooting-uvalde-gun-violence-children-teenagers
You didn’t answer the question, the original poster was talking specifically about school shootings. Also, I didn’t look but I’ll bet those statistics include suicide, not just homicides and mass shootings.
-
1
-
-
On 12/17/2018 at 6:18 PM, ExiledInIllinois said:
It's in the very definitions of the words conservative & liberal. Republicans tend to lean conservative, Democrats lean liberal.
Conservative:
"Holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
synonyms:traditionalist, traditional, conventional, orthodox, old-fashioned, dyed-in-the-wool, hidebound, unadventurous, set in one's ways."
Liberal:
"Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.
"they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people"
(of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
synonyms:wide-ranging, broad-based"
I think you have your answer right there.
There are negative connotations in the conservative side and all bubbly words on the liberal side. How about wanting change for change sake that cause catastrophes because of their religious adherence to their ideologies (see gas prices because climate change)
-
5 hours ago, ChiGoose said:
In America, we protect the right for a kid to be born and then killed in a school shooting.
It’s the American way!
What’s the chances of a being killed in a school? What’s the percentage of an abortion working and killing the baby?
Your logic fails.
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 6/24/2022 at 10:24 AM, BillStime said:
🎯
That’s because the right to bear arms is in the constitution. The right to bill a baby is not. /your argument.
On 6/24/2022 at 10:36 AM, The Frankish Reich said:No. I hate the decision.
I am pointing out that everything was pointing to the Republicans flipping Congress in November. Now, not so much. This will be an extremely unpopular decision.
Lol this is not true, inflation and economy effects everyone. Roe doesn’t, as much as the left would like you to believe.
5 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said:In one case, the woman makes a completely personal decision, about something that's on with her body.
In the other case, someone else makes that choice for her (much like decrepit boomers are doing now). Charge that person with whatever you like, but it's still super schitty and that person should be locked up.
I think what you're missing is the idea that the person with the thing going on in her body should be able to decide what she's going to do with the thing that's going on in her body. That's it. It's simple. Wtf do you care what somebody else does? Why do you get to say? So you can sleep well? Piss off.
The twisted logic of the left and their cronies, no care for the other person in this scenario. Truly sad
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, North Buffalo said:
They cant cash in donations for themselves... trying not to make a political statement but that statement is inaccurate... doesnt mean they cant use it for something that benefits an interest of their's but nothing directly just sayin
No such thing as a free market when entry and exit is controlled by an entity.
You don’t understand free market systems but this is not the place to discuss given it’s a Buffalo bills message board. I’ll digress and agree to disagree.
-
On 2/23/2022 at 9:59 AM, WhoTom said:
Seems to me that corporate welfare (i.e. government subsidies for billionaires) is the opposite of a free-market economy.
On the surface it may not look like it but it’s actually the government participating in free market principles for once. Team goes to the place that has the highest amount offered to the stadium.
-
2 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:
This will consistently be the finest example of a gif in a JA thread.
I mean, how much more perfect can it get? This guy is literally doing facial expressions that I do prior to my “O” face.
Speaking of…after watching this video….OOOOOOOOO yeah!
-
1 hour ago, Billsfanatixs said:
I hate being the guy(feel dirty, like im pats fan), assuming that the Bill's are great and there are 1 or 2 maybe, that compete))Feeling like Bengals might be "Top Opponent" this year.
If they can improve that horratious O-Line, i just wanna say, how many times, can a "Joe" named QB not won the superbowl. Bengals will be there, to deal with in playoffs, unless Joe gets hurt.
Hate him cuz hes not on the Bills and ill take Josh 70% of the time. GO BILLS!
Trade mark on "Horatious" and "Hereditory"
Like Josh “70% of the time”? What? 😂
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
8 hours ago, Rocky Landing said:
It'll be written on his name tag at the Target he'll be working at.
(I kid. Hope he surprises us.)
Or on his bust in Canton!
-
1 hour ago, LeGOATski said:
You don't remember Outside the Lines with Bob Vey? It was one of ESPN's most popular shows in the 90s. Gave them a huge ratings boost. Talked about all the off-field social stuff around sports. Mon-Fri.
No, I didn’t watch that, it was just in the mornings, sports center. Watched it on a loop, that’s all I cared about, highlights from the night before.
-
10 hours ago, BUFFALOBART said:
You see what you want to see...
Flip side, you’re ignorant of what you want to be ignorant of.
10 hours ago, LeGOATski said:That's just your political recency bias. The fact is that ESPN has discussed the political issues around sports since its inception through the 80s, 90, 00s. They just haven't adapted well and their programming sucks.
I remember nothing of the sort, just sports center rolling clips in the 80s and 90s. I would watch them every morning, over and over again. Just fun quips and sports. That was the hay day.
-
2 hours ago, LeGOATski said:
ESPN has sucked for a long time. I stopped watching 14 years ago, even though I was at peak sports fandom in my 20's/30's. You really wanna call it ppolitical? That's comical. It's just crappy programming since the early aughts.
You stopped watchful 14 years ago is probably why. It has become much more political since.
1 minute ago, BUFFALOBART said:ESPN's content sucks, and the staff wears knee pads emblazoned with the Patriots logo.
Politics has nothing to do with it..
Perhaps for you, but for me, and others on here it seems, it was the politics. I’d think we are not the only ones and there is likely a large contingent of fans that were turned off by the constant discussion of political issues.
-
1
-
-
42 minutes ago, Mickey said:
I exorcize my demons through flatulence. Nobody cheers me on.
Well I would conflatulate you!
-
-
-
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:
When you say "more secure border" what do you mean? I don';t see immigration as a threat. Why does the right need to make it seem so scary that we take in immigrants?
You don’t see people unfettered streaming across a border a threat? We don’t know who they are? You’re ok if there is sex trafficking happening, if there are drugs coming across, if there are any people wanting to do us harm coming across? You’re ok without borders at all? I am against that, it does not = great replacement theory like you’re trying to say. I’m not saying I don’t like it because I think my race is better than theirs, and that’s the big difference. My focus is on how it’s bad for the country to not know who is coming across.
-
6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Ah yes, the legacy media in concert with the message. See, you’re proving my point. Conflate everything with replacement theory on the right.
What is great replacement theory, I’d like to hear what you think it is. It’s a very specific thing. No, the republicans don’t believe in it, just because you want a more secure border does not mean you believe in replacement theory.
-
2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
What are you babbling about?
There is someone babbling, but it’s not me. The great replacement theory has nothing to do with legitimate grievances in polices such as open borders and taking issues with it. The great replacement theory is specific to the thought that people are replacing the white race, none of which the majority of republicans believe or any Fox News personality believes. The disinformation on the left to paint all republicans as complicit is bs and what you’re trying to spread with your comments. Disinformation at its best.
Why do the gays love the dems so much ?
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Yea, you said the part out loud, the reason why the red wave is coming, your and your ilk’s condescending attitude to those who can’t afford it. You are saying people should lower their living standards. Keep saying it, keep shouting it from the rooftops. You think this is the majority view but you are sorely mistaken and you’ll see the schelacking.
I do, I don’t care about democrat gaslighting to make it seem like it’s not their fault.