Campy

Heckuva play for sure. I thought it was actually a missed FG return though.

Truly. Damn kids.

I appreciate your optimism.

Game plans are created early in the week and implemented mid-week. There's not a whole lot of planning left to do on a Friday evening. Too bad you didn't run in there with your camera phone and snap a pic of him pinching a loaf.

I have a dart board in my Bills room. Have the kids come over here. Just tell them to bring the beer.

I've seen the broadcasts of English tournaments, and it's a lot like the article portrays ito be - well, maybe not as raucous. I guess it's because I don't fish or play poker, but the dart tournaments in HD sound cool to me.

That makes a lot of sense. That challenge would be better for JP - it'd push him a bit.

That one got me

Me too. Keeps me from being disappointed.

England thought the French sucked long before there was an America.

But you're cool with it if Willis gets stuffed 3 times because the Pats put 9 men in the box? Like I said, "I'm of the opinion..." Hindsight is 20/20, and it's easier to critique than do it - it's why critics are critics and not recording artists, painters, and football players.

I don't know. Maybe because the defense realized he was breaking the game open had started double-teaming him? I guess part of my frustration was that I just realized nobody here listens to the post game press conferences. Moulds said he was used out there to draw triple coverage. He ran it short to keep the deeper guys from being able to make the play on the pass to Roscoe. As it turns out, Holcomb felt like his best chance of getting the first was to throw it to Moulds to let him make a play. It is what it is, and there's still no use crying over spilled milk. And you know, I may be missing everyone's point -- Hell, I missed everyone's point in the "Bills will lose by 40" threads. I'll consider it a blessing.

Expect a reply to that right after all of the "fans" who were posting that the Bills were going to lose by 40 points answer "what the fook happened."

I'll pass on rooting for the Dolphins, thanks.

But here's my point: If those passes were successful and Bflo got a couple of first downs, then he's a creative risk-taker who sensed when the Pats were down. If he gives the ball too McGahee but he gets stuffed, he's running an offense that's too predictable. Hindsight is 20/20, but it doesn't mean that all of the Monday morning QBs (you and me included) know more about Bflo's offensive tendancies and the Pats' defensive tendencies at any given point in time than the Bills' coaches do. I'm of the opinion that it's much easier to sleep on it, read the post game articles, and start popping off on a message board than it is to choose the play and get it to the QB within 10 seconds. But that's just me.

I'm not defending a called 2-yard pass. I'm attacking 'tards for going after Clements when they haven't a clue - Clements didn't call a 2-yard pass. I'm attacking 'tards who blast Holcomb for making the best read he could. He says Moulds was the only open guy and he tried to get him the ball to make a play. If Moulds slips a tackle he got the first and it's a brilliant call. But he didn't, and now the coaches are idiots. Sorry. I've been around too long to buy into that line of thinking, but please, carry on...

Or they do the same thing and get stuffed and the TSW experts tell us the offense is too predictable...

And yet continue to invest your time, money, and emotion into them. What does that say about you?

Amazing, isn't it? We'll now return you to the TSW Retard Rodeo, joined already in progress...

2 turnovers late in the game sure looked to hurt Bflo more than Gray's blitzes did from where I watched it.

Perhaps, if they hadn't been on totally opposite sides of the field.

I'll keep my eyes open for that, but do me a favor and let me know where I can get a look at the NFL leaders in "hits."

He ran past the corner and would have been wide open if not for the safety who rotated over there after the snap, according to Holcomb. If the safety doesn't roll to Roscoe, Holcomb was going to go there, but the safety ended up drifting directly to the spot he was going to throw the ball. I just don't see where it's a bad idea. As for the rest of your post, I can't say I disagree. I was hoping they'd have McGahee as a 1 or 2 receiving option because, like you inferenced, he's a major threat in the open field.

Sending the fastest player on the team, the one who wowwed everyone with his hands and athletic ability in camp, downfield on a 4th and 7 isn't really "setting up the QB to fail", is it?

Remember, he tweaked his knee last week in Oakland. They were probably trying to limit his exposure to another injury and/or aggrevating it, and since Bflo is deeper at KR/PR than at CB, they most likely held him out of ST plays for that reason.