TakeYouToTasker

... LOL You're going to make an awfully fun cat toy if you stick around.

I said maybe.

Ah... Yeah. Maybe if he wants to be taken seriously (or at least less not seriously) he can remake his ****ty point.

I'll admit, I was hoping for Kurt Warner.

Usually when people come here and start spewing dopiness all over a thread, they begin by making some ****ty point, begin taking abuse over either their presentation or content, and then resort to the dopiness. Do you have a ****ty point to make?

I haven't made the argument that individuals shouldn't come out as gay, or even enter into gay relationships. That's the strawman you've introduced. Perhaps you'd like to next like to make the argument that participants in homosexual sex aren't more likely to contract STDs than participants in heterosexual sex, because feelings; and all that needs to happen to fix this is to change the perception about the disparity, and it will all go away.

Hillary is not a neo-conservative. Hillary is a pro-Hillary opportunist and will always do what is best for Hillary, ideology, constituents, country be damned.

My attitude toward people in non-nuclear families? My attitude is that when people make sub-optimal decisions, they should expect sub-optimal results, and that it is not only counterproductive, but also quite harmful, to propagate the idea that decisions shouldn't matter to outcomes. I didn't say poverty. I said "intergenerational poverty". The gifting of poverty to your children. And what about the acceptance of poor decision making do you think will raise people up? The reality is that when you normalize poor decision making, and make it acceptable, you weaken society because there is no shame left to drive people to make decisions that lead to better outcomes. The studies illuminate the reasons why some people do better than others inter-generationally. Pointing out that people's poor decision making is making their lives worse is helping them make their lives better if they choose to. Key point, is that it is the individual's place to make his life better. As to the absurd notion that if people more and more often start making the decisions that lead to worse outcomes that we should begin accepting those outcomes as positive, that's how a society circles the drain.

It's Red Zone and live streaming. No one is tuning out, they just have different methods of tuning in, and why watch one of two terrible games being broadcast in your local market when you can just watch a live action highlight show, or watch the game you want to see on-line.

They have changed the way I think. Before I really wasn't at all knowledgable about their situation. Now that they've made me aware, I feel absolutely terrible for them. It's tragic that a group of mentally ill individuals are being told that they aren't ill at all, similar to society telling schizophrenics that the voices in their head are real, not directing them to get help, all while they have a suicide rate of 40%. Absolutely tragic.

Why vote for the lesser of two evils?

You have about as much in common with libertarians as conservatives do.

In other words, you don't like the outcome of the studies, because it goes against the inclusive leftist narrative that all lifestyle choices lead to equal outcomes, and therefore all choices have equal merit. FYI, the two other leading predictors of intergenerational poverty were not finishing high school, and not securing and holding employment; but both of those significantly trailed in correlation to the non-nuclear family.

So Tyrod doesn't have to answer for not performing in clutch situations over a two year period because the defense didn't play well yesterday? Is that really the logic we're going with?

Reggie Bush, and don't think we'll add another.

Laughable post. Nothing but laughs.

Exactly.

Hot take? Don't be an idiot. Bills second half possessions: - 3 and out - 3 and out - 1 play TD - 6 plays for 27 yards - 3 and out - 3 and out - Late TD drive If there is anyone here who thinks thats acceptable, and thinks Tyrod isn't at fault, then I have to assume you're actually Miami fans, pulling for a loss.

He subbed in for certain personnel packages, and at first glance look solid, but I'd need to watch the all-22 to volunteer more.

His inability to keep his offense on the field led to exactly that. Dolphins can't score if they don't have the ball. Tyrod allowed the Dolphins to put pressure on an exhausted Buffalo defense that has spent 2/3 of the game on the field. That's correct.

LOL He doesn't set his feet when he has a 10 second pocket. He's just not very good, John.

"doesn't turn the ball over" is the minimum standard for a quarterback. The minimum. List of quarterbacks definitely better than Tyrod, in order: Brady, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, Brees, Newton, Palmer, Ryan, Newton, Wilson, Dalton, Luck, Carr, Rivers, Bortles, Manning, Winston, Stafford, Smith, and Bradford. So I revise my prior position. Tyrod is, at best, #20 over-all.

You don't even think he had a poor game? LOL, you aren't even worth discussing his play with then, because you aren't grounded in reality. Good grief, man.

No, he isn't. He's probably 18-22, and he's a sub 25 passer. He's probably top 1-3 athlete at his position though.

Or, you know, a top 15 QB