Not even comparable. Even a little bit.
One was engaging in a common legal tactic, and ultimately can be held accountable within the scope of the law.
The other constructed the world's largest money laundering organization, and used it to sell the United States of America to her enemies in a pay to play scheme orchestrated at the highest levels of our government; and then broke additional laws using a private server to hide this activity from scrutiny under the FOIA.
But, if you're up for a good ass-kicking, feel free to try an explain how these two things are even remotely similar, and how anyone participating in the later example is in anyway qualified for office, and further shouldn't be in prison for the rest of their life.