TakeYouToTasker

Good grief. Is having even a drop of self awareness not a thing anymore? I remember back when it used to be a thing...

This is fantastic, and (potentially) tells you a lot about Zay Jones' character.

Source? Evidence?

No, that's exactly what you said. What's hilarious is that your personal and intellectual growth are so stunted, by choice, that you don't even realize it, and worse yet that you're actually proud of it as demonstrated by the peacocking lap you're taking right now. It's absolutely hilarious to observe.

Well then, thank God is was a giant sack of abolitionist liberal Democrat Abe Lincoln pennies.

Are you a troll or just stupid? You'd have to be one of the two to blatantly disregard hard facts like that.

People who don't frequently take meetings don't understand the difference between "setting up a meeting" and "scheduling a meeting". Goldstone was scheduling a time for a meeting which had already been set up to occur.

No, seriously. What evidence?

I think sentencing would be a good standard. Based on what evidence?

Hardly, and saying so is intellectually dishonest. Entitlements make up the bulk of our spending, and as such spending cannot be addressed until they are addressed.

Haha, no worries man. Just a little good natured ribbing.

The same exact thing we had when it was posted just 12 hours ago, four posts above your post on the same page? Or did I need to phrase it as a question? What do I win?

To the board at large: The above is why we are doomed to have an actual shooting war in this country before all of this is said and done. A massive portion of the country is so married to their confirmation biases which report only to their feelings with an abject inability to think critically (this is not limited to one side of the ideological spectrum). We're in the rollout stages, and are having legal documents presented demonstrating the depths of criminality of our prior eight years of leadership, and there are an enormous amount of people who simply refuse to believe this to be true because they refuse to read the evidence, and are completely entrenched ideologically with ghettoized minds. What happens in the coming months when charges of treason are brought? Do the stoner Bob's of the world accept this? Bob, who is too lazy to read well sourced material which has been collated for him is unlikely to get off his couch, but others sharing his world view and wearing the same blinders are not.

You are an idiot for not understanding the logical underpinnings of your own arguments. You are an idiot for saying things like " Unknowable events that may or may not be true, you make an assumption and run with it." without a trace of irony. You are an idiot for opining conclusively about something you have admittedly not read. And lastly, you're an idiot for not realizing how idiotic the above three items are. Edit: and yes, I have demonstrated that the firing of James Comey was not obstruction of justice. You're an idiot for not understanding that as well.

I was under the impression that you opposed entitlement reform?

So when something reports to your confirmation biases, you don't question it's sources or methods. It's always hilarious to hear someone report that they've experienced as much personal and intellectual growth as they are willing to.

You made a specific claim: the firing of James Comey is tantamount to obstruction of justice. I have demonstrated that it is not, and that your argument is poor, as you used this "charge" as a prime example of why the investigation needs to continue. Edit: Also, LOL at your long post where you admit you don't believe Deranged Rhino's argument while simultaneously admitting you haven't read the voluminous evidence he's posted to support it. It must be nice to be just lazy enough not to be willing to have your biases challenged. Idiot.

Oh no, I followed, I'm just expounding because I found a sympathetic ear, and that particular line of reason really bothers me.

That one line of thought is absolutely baffling to me. If firing James Comey was tantamount to obstruction of justice, they wouldn't need to investigate. He did it. He fired him. Right out there in front of God and the whole of humanity, at least in part because of the Russia investigation, which he freely admits to. What about that needs to be investigated? He fired him. He gave his reasons. Does Comey become more fired after a thorough investigation? Does his firing finally rise to the standard of criminality only after a certain amount of tax payer dollars has been spent? How does this work?

So it's your contention that because someone started a thread nearly a year ago on the Two Bills Drive web forum, and titled that thread "Trump and Russia", that magic'd into existence some sort of legal standard which would invalidate actual evidence of criminality of the highest order by President Trump's political enemies, and confer permanent legitimacy on all future charges of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign? Because it sounds like that's exactly what you're saying.

Bold added by me. Can you speak to this?

Good grief... Obstruction of justice is a legal standard, not a political buzzword. Nothing Donald Trump has done rises to that legal standard. Legal experts all agree on this. Further, if the President did obstruct justice with his own words as you contend, then the investigation would be over and successfully completed because they would have already have him on obstruction of justice.

Why in the world would you want to step back from the details when the details are the key? The President is currently embattled by traitors who are actively trying to overthrow the legitimate federal government. Unless Mueller has been turned, and is currently helping the Trump administration stamp out the coup attempt by prosecuting those involved, there is no reason for Trump to permit the investigation when the investigation itself is a part of the coup attempt. As far as "whataboutism" that's exactly what you're engaging in. In the face of mountains of evidence of what Greg is claiming, you're sitting there with no evidence at all saying "what about Russia?!?!?".

The evidence of Greg's claims, all sourced for you here, is rapidly approaching the level of undeniablility, and you would know that if you'd bothered to read it. Included in that evidence, is evidence of exactly what I am saying in regards to the Trump-Russia investigation. Instead, you're claiming to be disinterested in "Greg's conspiracy theory" to the point of dismissal without vetting, and have thrown all of your weight behind trusting known liars with rapidly changing narratives, each being demonstrably proven wrong day after day, a new narrative foisted upon you the following day, which you happily lap up from the same people who were proven to be lying to you the day before.

Again, what is being demonstrated is that the Trump-Russia investigation is a farce perpetrated by the prior Administration, the Clinton Foundation, the Hillary Clinton campaign, the DNC, and elements of the intelligence committee for the purpose of rigging a federal election and then attempting a coup once they failed. But we should continue the investigation, even after this is conclusively demonstrated, why exactly?