TakeYouToTasker

Try not to be a retard. You may not succeed, but at least try.

Correct. If your an abject moron who cites agenda driven, cherry picked quotes intentionally taken out of context in order to perpetrate a narrative which runs counter to the objective truth, then it might not. Don't be that guy.

Oh to be a 23 year old serial killer again...

The meaning of words, especially in situation where government institutions have sought to infringe directly on the rights of American citizens in response to "terrorism", are important. So, no. Not "whatever". To the second, I'm also pleased that he's not going to be able to harm anyone else. There would probably be much more investigative value to having him alive, however.

So you're advocating for a brand of isolationism which chooses to ignore bad actors on the geo-political stage. Care to explain the wisdom inherent to your position?

Are there any indications that his motivations were political? Without that direct evidence, he's just a run of the mill serial killer, not a terrorist.

"They" know all about the Las Vegas shooting. You don't. And that's because "they" don't want you to know. It's why the story died on the vine, and the CIA mouthpieces never covered it. Think Schiff. Think KSA. Think human trafficking.

Given demographics, this is a direct attempt to disarm minorities. Democrats: "Only white people have the right to self defense."

Right?

That's correct.

Be very careful here. It's a slippery slope. I started as a vocal Never Trump libertarian, but after beginning to begrudgingly concede to his achievements, I was compelled, by hard evidence, to begrudgingly concede to the likelihood of a targeted conspiracy against his Administration by treasonous elements within our prior government and career holdovers still entrenched; and now here I am publicly defending him on a fringe NFL fan site.

Say what you will about the man, but his foreign policy has been nothing short of world changing for the greater good. He is walking us back from the edge of a shooting war with Russia, which was being sought by the CIA and hawkish uni-polarist elements within our government. He has gotten North Korea to come to the table and negotiate nuclear disarmament, he has worked to purge the bad actors in Saudi Arabia, he has defeated ISIS, he has eliminated the funding for Hezbollah which is leading to the fall of the Mullahs in Iran, and he is now working to broker peace between Israel and Palestine. So, as distasteful as you may find it, yes, Donald Trump has been the pinnacle of tremendous global leadership, and the world is a better place for it.

Well yeah, of course you do. You're siding with the folks who are looking to start World War Three, engaging the Russians in a shooting war, rather than the folks who are working to normalize relations, and press for peace.

Sounds like someone is on the prowl for anal.

Hence the importance of the Internet Bill of Rights.

This is not a secret. Individuals seeking to maximize harm and damage tend to look for easy victims. The easiest victims are those disallowed from possessing force multipliers to use in their own defense.

Firing people who "question him" isn't an appropriate way to describe the Trump White House. Trump fires people who can't, or won't, work to further the governing agenda of his Administration; and he replaces those whom have served there purpose within his administration. That's reasonable at worst, and a net positive at best.

I'll field this, though I know it was not directed to me: No, he has not. The Chief Executive has the authority to fire whomever he wishes working under him who serve at the pleasure of the President. The President fired James Comey, and he said why he fired him. Comey was "wasting time with Russian nonsense", and the President wanted him focused elsewhere. The President's firing of Comey did not impede or obstruct the ongoing investigation; and if the firing of James Comey rose to the standard of obstruction of justice then there is nothing left to investigate, as the President fired him for the reasons he gave in plain sight, in front of God and the whole world. If firing Comey were obstruction of justice, the President would be being tried for obstruction of justice. But he is not, because it is not.

Hey, man. You're the piece of **** making baseless charges of illicit drug use in place of an argument in order to intentionally discredit someone. That sort of behavior should be bannable. Edit: And you think it's funny. You really are a slimy !@#$, Bob. No surprise you're a liberal given your devout inability to accept responsibility for your poor behavior.

When you're losing an argument you think it's appropriate to make charges of illicit drug use against the person you're arguing with? You're just another weak minded !@#$ who resorts to ad hom attacks and a litany of other logical fallacies in order to protect yourself from having to examine the failing elements of your own argument.

You guys are having two completely different conversations.

I'm curious on what grounds you alledge "he isn't very smart". I would posit that anyone achieving all he has in life is very smart. You don't have to like the man personally, or agree with him politically; but to deny his obvious accomplishments and the human traits which typically generate that level of success doesn't make any sense on an intellectual level. The left has a habit of doing this. They look at the acceptance if their world view as a supreme symbol of intelligence, and then castigate those leaders with the gall to disagree for being "stupid", as evidenced by their lack of agreement. It was done with Reagan, then W. Bush, and now Trump.

Yeah... Grab me a coupon if you can. I absolutely did.