TakeYouToTasker

I'm suggesting that it's completely disgusting to build a podium out of their dead bodies. I'm also suggesting that I couldn't possibly give fewer !@#$s about what their political opinions would have been. You, and pieces of **** like David Hogg, and the ones martyring them.

Yes, he is a disgusting person. He's presuming the politics of the dead, and standing on their corpses, and he's doing so to the designed exclusion of the voices of other classmates who disagree with his stance. Further, he's attempting to use himself as a human shield to deflect criticism of the position he's advocating (anti-rights); with dopes like yourself saying stupid things like "how dare you attack the survivors of a school shooting!" !@#$ you. His argument is vile, and anyone who makes it should be castigated. The fact that you don't find this sort of demagoguery disgusting says everything anyone needs to know about you and your politics. I'll be making a second donation to the NRA in your name.

Dick Morris hints that there is a grand jury currently convened in relation to the Clinton email situation. The Senate committee asked the DoJ for documents related to the charging decisions in the email scandal, and the DoJ rebuffed those requests with one of the reasons listed being "cannot relinquish information related to evidence being presented to a grand jury". Unverified, so take it for what it's worth.

Again, that's not why he's a liar. He's a liar because he spun a web of lies in his podium demagoguery. And I don't give a **** what his relationship is to the events. He's chosen to stand on the still warm corpses of his classmates and use them to push his personal political agenda, and is attempting to use himself as a human shield to protect the people now handling him in the pushing of that agenda. He's a disgusting person, with disgusting ideas. He can !@#$ right off. I'll be making a massive donation to the NRA in his name.

That's not why he's a liar, though given that he is a liar I find it difficult to believe anything else that comes out of his mouth.

He's a liar. All SJWs are.

Lost in this is Grant's hilarious bare assertion that people acting with any sort of profit motive are bad actors, while those acting without what Grant can discern to be a profit motive are angelic.

Correct, Grant, there is no secrecy. The funding is easy to follow. The dollars are flowing in from leftist organizations, and the organizational infrastructure was in place waiting to seize on the opportunity to take these young victims and use them politically. It's not about profit, it's about the nature of rights. I could care less if the NRA profits, or not, from their Second Amendment advocacy. All I care about is that they are advocating on the side of natural rights. If that makes them profitable, God bless them. It's nice when doing the right thing works to balance your books. People of your ilk, including those using these children as their pawns, don't believe in the concept of rights. They wish to forward a political agenda under which the concept of natural rights are incredibly problematic, and are using guns as a wedge issue to forward that agenda. As an aside, are you sure I'm an anti-Semite? Last week I'm pretty sure I was a war mongering Zionist for supporting Isreal's right to exist. I guess that particular carton of milk has reached it's expiration date. Please let me know when Mother Jones tells you that I'm done hating Jews, and I'm back to being a Jew loving piece of ****. Thanks.

Paper dragon. It was always a paper dragon. President Trump is negotiating from a position of strength.

Right... So you believe in the fantasy of magical children, and have ignored the reality of political organization and mobilization, the logistics there of, the costs associated, and where the money comes from.

Yeah, or we could follow the money, given the resources it takes to organize a national level protest of this magnitude, and actually find the truth; which is that leftists like yourself are, once again, using victims to build pulpits on to advance their anti-rights agenda.

I have no problem at all with the homeless using their prerogative to exercise their natural rights, though as I understand them, those natural rights do not include demanding others arm them. Poverty is not a crime. It should not separate an individual from their rights. If they can acquire arms, they have a right to them.

Reminds me of Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine and Audioslave fame.

Hey, can you please add "Lecture adults about gun control, and impose arbitrary limits on the practice of individual's natural rights" to 12+ please?

That's because you have absolutely no idea what is involved in organizing national level protests of this magnitude. This was an existing apparatus put in place, waiting for tragedy in order to use the victims as a temporary front for their politics.

With the introduction of positive rights into American Constitutional Law, one could argue that if the "Right to Healthcare" means that others are required to provide you with healthcare, then the Second Amendment means that others are required to provide you with firearms. I think it's a poor argument, but it's at least internally logically consistent.

"common sense" "reforms" Those are the two items that need to be torn down and exposed.

The nature of the Second Amendment makes it especially difficult to violate without shedding the blood of tyrants. Perhaps David and Lauren Hogg have decided not enough Parkland students have died of gun violence, and would like to offer to help confiscate firearms?

President Obama is a monarchist. It's the same fight humanity has been having since freedom was conceived of

That is straight forward. What I want clarification over is the "why".

Herpes. I would rather have herpes than either of the two choices you outlined.

I am trying to avoid making assumptions. I would hope someone would explain themselves.

Yeah... I have no idea what's going on here.

You know, now that I'm thinking about it, it really doesn't.

I'm not sure if that would make it easier or more difficult to understand him.