TakeYouToTasker

I'll just go ahead and wait for you to tell me whatever you're going to insist my position is, so we can just jump straight to the "Grant's strawman" portion of the discussion.

Don't worry. The leftists aren't coming for your freedoms.

I pointed to a current and ongoing example of a hostile government running roughshod over the natural rights of a disarmed populace in a Western nation. You, being the disgusting liar that you are, created a strawman. But keep going. You're winning. You're not coming of as an historically ignorant, unhinged, lying, communist at all.

Who ever could have guessed that the resident militant neo-Marxist would opine that we must trust the Ministry of Information to tell us what news it true, what news is false, and that those who oppose the Ministry itself are prone to believing the second kind.

Your intellectual dishonesty is staggering. It's so breathtaking, that I'm grateful the board preserves your nonsense in posterity, such that it can be used as evidence of what a dishonest !@#$ you are in posterity. You are the only person I've ever seen use the phrase "white genocide" on this board, and you've used it to bludgeon those individuals using examples of hostile governments running roughshod over the rights of disarmed populaces with charges of racism. Why do you differentiate between the genocide of whites, and the genocide of other races or peoples? No one else has done so. Why do you?

This Pope is not so much fascinated with debates about good an evil in so much as he tends towards arguments that there is no such thing as evil; going so far as to argue that the Lord's Prayer, the very Word of God, should be changed to those ends. This is wicked. Indeed.

Good grief, man. That avatar is horrifying.

This from the same Pope who saw himself holding the authority to change the Word of God. Gary, the Deceiver is alive and well, and this Pope holds his hand.

Which of his arguments did you find the most compelling? The one where he stated that he hasn't read the supporting evidence of what he's arguing against, or the one where he called the person he disagreed with a homosexual, racist, pedophile?

I'm old enough to remember back when liberals were opposed to large corporations aligning with political parties to advocate for the violation of rights.

What the !@#$ is period shaming?

If what he was doing was in opposition to the free market, it's the best argument against government planning in the whole history of ever.

Let him keep going. He thinks he's winning. Right? There are not enough scarey black rifles in the whole world to hunt a squirel that big.

In summary: Grant finds the concepts of individual rights and liberty to be problematic to the establishment of his Marxist utopia. To those ends he will lie and slander, spin and distort. He will attempt to impose a fictional account of the Founding, and the views of the Founders. And then he will blame you for his poor behavior. Again, Grant is a SWJ, and as such, he will always lie.

History has a way of constructing great men. I don't believe Trump to have been a remarkable man when he took office; in fact I was a never Trump libertarian who found him morally reprehensible, but I believe history's eye will view him as exactly the man we needed in the trying times to come. He will, beyond a shadow of a doubt, be known as the man who saved the American republic from enemies both domestic and abroad; and it will be unquestionable.

It's been almost two decades since that time, so many will never get their due for their malfeasance. A few like McCain will, however. The scandal isn't partisan. Clapper and Brennan are a consistent thread.

Many in the media will be indicted as well. The scandal is massive.

The 2020 candidates, in many cases, will be caught up in the scandals; and these scandals are so large and revolting that there will be no hand washing. After what comes, you'll see exactly how hard Trump has fought for his country, in order to save our freedoms and protect it as a republic, from bad actors both at the highest levels of our government, and their masters who in many cases are not Americans. I am not engaging in hyperbole.

No. The left will be up to their eyeballs in scandals of the variety that have the potential to drive angry masses to righteous violence. By the time 2020 rolls around I have strong doubts that there will even be a Democratic Party, and President Trump will be cast as the second coming of Washington.

Well, there are the text messages in which she completely denies ever have sex with President Trump.

That's pretty much exactly the case. This is going to impact the entire political class across both parties.

No it isn't. You simply check to see if the work is sourced, and vet the sources. I mean, it involves doing a little bit of work; so I can understand why someone who has outsourced their critical thinking to "professionals" might object, but it's not hard to do.

And again Grant denies the entire purpose of our Constitution, and all the history buttressing that understanding. Which makes sense given how the Constitution is problematic to his ideology under which the people serve the desires of the state, and have no rights.

John Brennan and James Clapper as an extension of those they work for.