Jump to content

TakeYouToTasker

Community Member
  • Posts

    19,668
  • Joined

Everything posted by TakeYouToTasker

  1. You'd probably need to have those six all neatly lined up for prosecution to roll up on 44.
  2. These sorts of intellectual exercise are always fun. I'll play later.
  3. Greg is advancing the idea that DPRK has been, for the last 50 years or so, a CIA blacksite and a protected "playground for the global elite" where human rights abuses go completely unchecked and a global hub for human trafficking to those ends. Think Epstein's pedo island on steroids. The way to peace there has been paved by a series of military ops which have cleared out the CIA influence there. This speaks to why Pompeo's CIA was handling the logistics there instead of State. As to Iran and it's religious leaders: the Iranian people don't bow to them. They have been protected and propped up by the same bad actors within the CIA who had their hands all over NK. The funding for Hezbollah and the Mullahs have been completely cut off by the Trump administration, and the Iranian people are ousting them with the support of the Iranian army.
  4. Clever enough to be intentional. Code.
  5. Certainly explains the MAGA hat! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!
  6. This gives me a fantastic idea for a "mockumentary" style board game, in the Clue format. Who else had "Art Bell in 2012 with the coming global superstorm"?
  7. Don't let a bit of humor couched in logical consistency trigger you. Pledge your support for these magical 5th grade draft oracles today!
  8. Understood, though you'd likely be very surprised, then, by what I enjoy reading.
  9. Fair enough. I'd just advise readers to take your contribution as unsourced/unconfirmed as opposed to fact then.
  10. I'm sure, but can you source it? I'd like to read it.
  11. Can you source it? Not that I don't believe you, I'd just like to see the tax law.
  12. ... Taxed at 150% of the value so through inheritance, they assume a liability 50% greater than the gross amount of the inheritance? Source please.
  13. Again, it wasn't an order for pizza and hotdogs.
  14. Hey, if a group of kids roughly 3-5 years older are qualified to lecture the nation about the Second Amendment then I see no reason why these 5th graders aren't qualified to run the Bills draft.
  15. Exactly. He should be turned 90 degrees clockwise taking a pegging. That's what you meant, right?
  16. That's not what he purchased for $65,000.
  17. Im old enough to remember when credible journalism included doing investigative research rather than making charges of malfeasance without evidence.
  18. Please don't send me anymore PMs. I had hoped that when you first messaged me you were sincere about your intent to add quality to the board. You weren't, because that's who you are as a man. Dishonest. Lousey. The type of person who throws a sucker punch. Unwelcome. Untrustworthy. Less than.
  19. I've always attempted to kill any man who threw the first punch. Aggressive cowards deserve to die.
  20. I understand your take here, but yes, I think it's apt as a metaphor when what happens here is a "war of words". I think, when we engage each other in this medium, that intellectual honesty is of paramount importance. All discussion is pointless without that as a baseline. To those ends I think that those who behave in intellectually dishonest ways should be shamed. You. Me. Anyone.
  21. Never throw the first punch, always win the fight. Gary threw the first punch. You're defending that action.
  22. No, I mean I hoped you'd contribute positively. Like Doc Brown.
  23. I'm beginning to feel like trying to engage with you over these last few months might have been a waste of my time. I had really hoped you might try move forward being a positive contributor to the community. I'm still holding out hope.
  24. I'M GOING TO BE INTERNET FAMOUS GUYS!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...