TakeYouToTasker

How dare you engage in such disgusting attacks on my family! I hope they remove you from the board! No, you engaged in personal attacks, and brought your family into them. It doesn't surprise me that you're completely unable to take any personal responsibility for your own actions, because that's what spineless cunts like you do: engage in !@#$ery, and then blame everyone else for your own bull ****. Go step in front of a bus. That sounds just about right.

The purpose of a nation is to preserve and protect a shared culture and values which bind it together. Once those binds are gone, a country acts as a prison, holding incompatible groups together for no reason other than "that's what we've always done". The ties that bind us are long since cut. As to the second, what is causing the division are the unfounded charges of racism, and the ongoing civil war in our intelligence community which is seeking to incite political violence in order to protect the interests of the global elite at the expense of republican democracy and the people of our country. President Trump is the duly elected President. The peaceful transition of power which has been one of the bedrocks of the survival of our country is being undermined, and the half of the country which voted for the President is becoming entrenched against these constant attacks. There is no way past this.

Oh, I don't think it's likely. Besides, if you really cared an ounce about your family you wouldn't inject them into insulting posts you make on message boards. But you did, and so you don't. A real man would never attempt to weaponize his family. A father who cared a whit about his kids certainly wouldn't do it here. But then you aren't a good person, and are demonstrating through your willingness to introduce your children into personal attacks on other people that you aren't a very good father either.

Maybe you should stop introducing your family into personal attacks directed at other posters. If you don't want them dragged into the conversation, then don't drag them into the conversation.

Actually, that was you. I tried to have a civil conversation, and you threw the first punch. You're also the one who involved your family in the conversation. Stop lying, if you're capable.

When people come down, and begin their engagement with baseless charges or racism like Coach Tuesday over political disagreements, or, when asked to better surmise their argument because I'm genuinely trying to understand it and wish to engage them, but they aren't making it coherently, and they respond with something along the lines of: "Wow, you need me to dumb it down for you? Hahahaha The real truth is you cannot rationally argue your own point." like this guy did, then there is no point in trying to be civil, as they aren't interested in civility. When approached by people like this, you don't try to explain how you aren't a racist, or that you aren't unintelligent; because they have demonstrated that they aren't good people, and that they are intellectually dishonest, and that they think less of you as a person because you believe in hard work, family, personal responsibility, and natural rights. They don't deserve the conversation, because they don't want one. They actually seek to avoid it, and substitute ugly charges for debate. And the truth, my friend, is that when the sides of the discussion are as polarized as this, we are approaching a shooting war. There is no reconciling the two positions, and we no longer have a shared culture which binds us. It used to be that two people could agree that there was a problem, and disagreed about the way to solve it. Now, we no longer share that, and it's time to be done with the Union. I'm not giving up any more ground to these people. When they act like !@#$s, you treat them like !@#$s.

I know, a thriving economy, an end to systemic human trafficking, and world peace are a truly horrible legacy. You !@#$ing piece of **** racist.

If what you've presented here today is any indication of your understanding of the federal tax code, you're likely already under investigation for negligence and/or fraud. That may be for the best though. That way when you go to prison, your five year old will have the opportunity to be raised by whatever guy your wife starts !@#$ing, and that level of addition by subtraction may give him the fighting chance in life that you clearly won't be able to.

So you came down here to be an !@#$, post Op-Eds which report to your confirmation biases, and to write incoherent gibberish? Great. I'm sure you're a real peach of a guy. Thank you for saving me the trouble of trying to figure out if you're worth anyone's time or not.

No, you illiterate piece of ****, I want you to write in coherent English. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, and am actually willing to engage with you, so stop acting like a !@#$ing moron.

This isn't coherent. Can you please structure this in a way that makes sense to the reader? I'm more than happy to have this conversation with you, but we can't start here.

Ah, the politics of jealousy. What makes you think you're entitled to another person's earnings at all?

I always wonder how much of my income people think they're entitled to. After federal, state, social security and medicare, local taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, luxury taxes, road tolls, etc I already pay upwards of 40% of my earnings in taxes. I'm told this isn't enough, and that I'm not paying my fair share because my taxes don't hurt me as much as taxes hurt those who earn less. That's an absurd proposition. How much do they want?

You're referencing Op-Eds published with the intent of spinning a business friendly tax reduction as a give away to the wealthy as it's primary purpose. That's intellectually dishonest, and thusly "crap". If you want to debate the merits of policy, don't start by cramming talking points designed to highlight and misrepresent the purpose of the policy in question into your argument. As an aside, his argument was everything that came after identifying your Op-Ed as the garbage it is. You know, this:

Some day is now pretty soon. Any more dead girls in your office, Joe?

You can celebrate the dead Russians over white Russians.

If you learned any of this gibberish in school, you need to hire yourself a lawyer (as you're clearly not bright enough to represent yourself), and sue them for a complete refund. It doesn't surprise me that you're such a gleeful whip swinger, as the stupid are inclined towards brutality. While you're busy spouting off a bunch of nonsense, perhaps you'd be interested in pouring out a bit more stupid for the class? You've now made the bare assertion that black individuals, per capita, do not commit more crimes. In the process, the logical structure you'd have to build that argument on, is that poverty does not increase the likelihood of criminality. Prove it. Source your claims, with data.

As soon as we believe they are not capable of something better is when the shooting war begins. As it currently stands, the two worlds we inhabit are not compatible; and the factions are growing more hostile. "Grief" He's referencing individuals, living in harmony, without divisions; paraphrasing John Lennon. He is not making an argument for a one party state. Again, your reading comprehension is awful.

Good grief... Your reading comprehension is awful. Seriously. He didn't argue for a one party state at all. He said that the two existing parties are about to be pushed into extinction. He made no argument for what would arise in the aftermath. Agree with his premise, or not, he didn't say what you said he did. Do better.

You aren't a good person, Coach. I know this because theirs no such thing as a kind hearted plantation overseer. It takes a special kind of evil to swing the whip that breaks the man, and that's you, whistling while you wor... err... whip. Yes, the black community has to confront the issue. Blacks commit more crimes per capita because blacks are more likely to be poor. Blacks are more likely to be poor because of government legacy programs of the Johnson era, specifically targeted at black Americans, incentivize intergenerational poverty. Blacks are not less than, as you and your policy prescriptions seem to imply. Blacks individuals have agency, and are capable to making good decisions and getting ahead. There is absolutely nothing a white person, any white person, can do to stop black individuals from having children out of wedlock (the single largest indicator of intergenerational poverty), or from dropping out of high school (the second largest indicator of intergenerational poverty). The black community has to deal with this, because these are problems that need to be addressed at the community level. Black leaders need to confront the reality of these issues, and lead in the other direction, towards a culture that values the nuclear family, and values hard working men present in the home. It has to be black leaders, because the racial divide in this country is so deep, being pushed by !@#$s like you, that the messaging can't come from outside or it won't be trusted.

Your reading comprehension is awful, or you're a liar. It's one of the other. So are you stupid or dishonest? No one here has said that blacks are inherently more likely to commit crimes. Criminality is not inherent to race. What has been pointed out, very accurately, and buttressed by data, is that blacks are more likely to commit crimes. This is not due to race, but rather is due to economic circumstance, as crime is a socio-economic problem, and blacks are more likely to be poor. This is for a myriad of reasons including, but not limited to: the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, and to the legacy of Lyndon B. Johnson who set out with a political goal of creating a political ghetto for America's black community to live in which decimated the black family. This is the unfortunate reality, and by denying it, you are making things worse for black Americans, not just today, but for countless future generations .

Hardly. Stop acting like a hopped up plantation owner, eager to keep black people powerless and on the end of your whip. Blacks people do commit more crimes, as crime is a socio-economic phenomenon, and black people are more likely to be poor. Couple that with the fact that high crime areas are, for obvious reasons, more heavily targeted by law enforcement, and you wind up with higher arrest rates. These are real problems that the black community needs to address, and as a community they won't rise above it until they do. Your desire does nothing other than serve to oppress them further by pretending the problems aren't real, and worse, blaming others in order to cast blacks as victims of those who would point this out. You need them on your plantation. You need them to be victims of boogey men. Because if they aren't, then they can't be relied on to push your ugly agenda. They can't succeed on their own, right Coach? Only righteous white people like you can save them. They shouldn't be held to account for their failings as individuals, right Coach? Everything that goes wrong is the fault of racists trying to keep them down, and only righteous white people like you can help. !@#$ you. You're a supremacist of the worst order. A wolf in sheep's clothing extending a social assistance check in one hand, but menacing a master's whip in the other. All they are to you is votes. Even if it only counts as 3/5th of a vote in your own mind. You piece of ****.

According to the 2015 US census, 14.4% of the population is black, and 77.7% of the population is white. According to 2014 FBI crime data, 27.8% of crime is committed by black individuals, and 69.4% of crime is committed by white individuals. So yes, black people do commit more crimes than white people per capita.