TakeYouToTasker

I'm not paying you for stealing my work.

I don't need to. You've been sharing my thesis for several weeks now.

Your entire existence can fairly easily be reduced to a series of character flaws.

Do you usually take it upon yourself to speak for other people, or do simply believe he's incapable of responding for himself?

For someone who claims to be a doctor, you sure seem to conduct yourself in a way which is considered incredibly irresponsible for people in that profession. Do you often offer clinical diagnosis of individuals you've never examined, or even met? More over, do you do so counter to those in your profession who have examined the individuals in question, and who provide them regular medical care?

Who?

I find it rather disappointing to learn that Baskin thinks of our 44th President as nothing more than "the brown guy".

Lawyers crafting law that directs tax payer dollars to lawyers. Not a bad racket.

Today I learned that it's nefarious for the leaders of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to meet with, and be briefed by, the agencies they run.

Again, shooting war soon.

It's because they don't have an understanding of what fascism actually is. They believe it to be a "right wing" phenomenon because they don't understand the political dichotomy of Europe, where all governments operate to the left, and many still have functional (if sometimes ceremonial) monarchies, when it actually aligns very neatly with the big government edicts of the left here in America. Part and parcel to this, they don't understand that the bad things about fascism were not that the trains ran on time. The objectionable things were, and are, the same things they support themselves.

Grant hasn't been around this month. An interim champion had to be named. The two can square off to unify the title if Grant ever decides to return.

It's not a thread I was participating in, and I'm not interested in making moral arguments on the main board in line with the board's policies. But let's talk about it. First, who the hell do you think you are to decide what I am obligated to make commentary on, and where I am required to make it? Shall you also now dictate what other websites I need to follow in order to make arguments? Second, why is it unacceptable to the point that you throw a hissy fit, and get board moderators involved, for someone else dragging posters into threads in sub-forums they aren't involved in; while you are plainly happy to do the exact same thing yourself within the space of less than a week? Third, how is it possible for you to be such a monument to stupidity that you can't understand the difference between making fun of the perpetrator of an assault and making fun of the victim of an assault, while also claiming to be a medical doctor? You are, without a shadow of a doubt, the most intellectually dishonest poster we've seen here in around a month, or you have the IQ of a half-wet mop.

It's not so much an attempt to get him to take personal responsibility, as a demonstration for the reader that he won't. Sunlight is a tremendous disinfectant.

I don't know about that, but I'll certainly credit you with being the Santero with the most magical chicken bones.

Fine. You win. You have no morals as opposed to poor morals.

I thought we just encountered a situation where "Real News" was highly critical of dragging posters into threads they haven't participated in, in order to challenge their view points? How did he describe it again? Oh, there it is: "In my opinion, it's disgusting behavior." Odd, then, that he would do this: As I said before, low morals.

I'm sure you think so...

If we're comparing values, I'm comfortable being the guy who doesn't think assault is funny. That you're comfortable being the other guy in the conversation says all anyone needs to know about you.

It's funny when another person is assaulted if you're a complete scumbag. Scumbags also do things like describing actual physical assault victims as "triggered", as if being vocally upset that you're being physically assaulted is unreasonable. Keep on doubling down though. It's a fantastic look. Especially for someone claiming to be a doctor.

Own. Your. Words. Own them.

I thought it was wrong to assault people, especially women; and that it was reprehensible to label a woman a "B word", and to chant that we should "!@#$ her" in a public chant meant to shame and bully her? You seem to think that's OK as evidenced by your joke. So, much like Kanye is no longer black, I can only assume you no longer consider Tomi Lahren a woman? Or is it just that you're a total hypocrite, and a low moral piece of garbage?

Tomi Lahren is a conservative, a Republican, and a Trump supporter; so she's no longer a women, and it's hilarious to assault her. Again, we're not far away now from the shooting war.

I'm sure it's coming any day now. Seriously.

We're not far from the shooting war now.