TakeYouToTasker

This seems to be becoming a theme with you, so please allow me to repeat myself. Not you, nor anyone else on the left, are the arbiter of who or what is racist. You are not imbued with some magical spark which allows you to interpret policy or motive. You do not have the moral high ground, and you are not on the "right side of history". These are things you have invented in your own head to lend superiority to a weak argument which loses on merit, such that it gives you cause to diminish the argument of your opponent, in the hopes that it will allow you to skip the actual policy debate. It's a horse **** tactic employed by the intellectually weak. So, as I demanded in the other thread where you've made baseless charges of racism absent evidence, kindly present actual documented evidence of racism, or kindly shut the !@#$ up.

Show me documented evidence that Corey Stewart is a white supremacist. The left does not own the moral high ground, or the definition of white supremacist. Supporting the preservation of Confederate landmarks does not somehow imbue someone with racism, and is a perfectly reasonable position for anyone looking to preserve their history to take. Further, having owned slaves at some point in the past when owning slaves was commonplace and accepted does not make someone a bad person. It simply makes them a person who existed during the time they existed in. If you had been alive in the 1840's in the Antebellum South, and had been fortunate enough to be landed, you almost certainly would have owned slaves. The monuments to these men are not monuments to slavery. They are monuments to the work of their entire lives which named them the Great Men of their times, and you, once again not owning the moral high ground or the Proper Perspective, do not have the world's permission to change or sanitize our history in order to make it conform to your 2018 liberal American moral lens. So, again, show me the documented evidence that Corey Stewart is a white supremacist, or kindly shut the !@#$ up.

This is a dumb post. You're better than this.

Well, he is advocating acts of war, through public policy which is incompatible with American sovereignty. While it's not yet time to go to war, it is absolutely time to build the wall, and to militarize it.

Very serious question: What do you think the border situation looks like? Very seriously. I have the impression that your vantage is exceptionally romanticized. Tell me, if you are willing to engage, what immigration looks like on our Southern border. Talk about out the purposes and reasons, but be comprehensive.

Red herring.

Wait and watch, sir. Wait and watch.

Walked the statement back to wanting to go to war under false pretenses and having the domestic economy decimated. He wants your finances decimated, and wants your children to die in a foreign land; so he can have his political preferences. He wants you destitute. He wants you to suffer deep loss. Not himself. He's 100% insulated. That's what he walked it back to. I know that's not the point of your post, but for anyone who does make that argument, that's the argument they're really making.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Mike_Lee.htm https://www.lee.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/voting-record

Much of what is happening right now in Trump's Presidency ties back to a few moneyed families who own more than half of the world wealth, and control the entire supply of money, and thus the world. They are at the top of the pyramid of the global elites President Trump and our military intelligence apparatus are at war with, and the good guys are winning. The era of fractional reserve banking, and the global manipulation of events that accompanies it, will soon be at an end.

That there are individuals in places of power who advocate for this sort of thing is sobering. Let this sink in, liberals and never-Trumpers of the board readership: The intellectual leadership of your movement believes that nuclear war, in which billions die, is preferential to a Trump Presidency. Think about this: a billionaire, whom has access to remote locations and food stores, and whose life would not be impacted by such events is advocating for your death such that he get his way politically. Let that sink in.

Time traveler!

No mention of the partial Nazi's? Bigot.

Ayup.

They're 100% imaginary. These guys: Are not even remotely similar to these guys:

That's not a very good comparison. F35s didn't exist before Lockheed Martin. Bread has been being made for about 8000 years. Big Agriculture exists for the benefit of Big Agriculture. We don't need them at all, much less to subsidize their existence.

This is, of course, true. What it doesn't mean, however, is that Big Agriculture subsidy is the right way to do it.

Welfare was intended as a back door subsidy to Big Agriculture.

How shady is a grove of locusts?

Living in the American North East, I spend a lot of time driving on winter roads. I'm all for getting rid of ice.

Hitler = JEW

Cross posted from another thread: Hillary Clinton campaign official arrested. https://truepundit.com/fbi-clinton-campaign-official-arrested-on-child-rape-charges-feds-cashing-in-on-weiner-laptop-intel/

Same individual that Greg's link spoke about. Added: He's a Clinton campaign official. https://truepundit.com/fbi-clinton-campaign-official-arrested-on-child-rape-charges-feds-cashing-in-on-weiner-laptop-intel/

What should he say to people who call him "literally Hitler"? People who have called him a racist and a bigot absent evidence since his campaign began? People who did the same thing to George W. Bush and a statesman like Mitt Romney?