TakeYouToTasker

Actually you conflated the issues here: Then you doubled down on the point leveraging an ad hom attack against another poster, dismissing a very clean rebuttal of a point you just lost, by labeling him alt-right. So, to summarize quickly: 1. The board records the things you post. It's best not to proceed as if you didn't introduce a concept yourself when the boards history indicates that you did. 2. You were wrong. Finally, yes, it the production of domestic steel is a national security issue, just as much as energy independence is.

Wait... You don't think the trafficking of humans and narcotics, done by cartels which largely control Mexico's government, and all the gang violence which accompany both, pose a national security threat? Seriously?

So, Democrats are insisting that the President shouldn't honor his Constitutional mandates, such as conducting diplomacy with foreign heads of state, or it's a Constitutional crisis?

If you, at any point, begin to take that dolt seriously for any reason, you're even dumber than he is.

For someone like Strzok, opportunity was likely enough. The path of least resistance is a viable option for many men seeking sexual relationships.

It's population control using tried and true methods. People have an innate desire to want to be a part of the pack, and in order to do so will conform to what they believe is popular in order to better fit in, and not be ostracized.

I'm curious how they came to that conclusion given that the DNC never turned over their server.

This issue is not with the notion of comedy. The issue is with the reality that an incredible percentage of the population use those platforms as news outlets, and that since that realization was made, they have become direct propaganda arms.

No one is required to read anything in particular in order to form an opinion. Individuals are free to be as uninformed or as misinformed as they want. What I would posit is that there is a very deliberate attempt to control the flow of information to the public in order to cultivate a misinformed public for the purpose of creating a blind spot in which very powerful bad actors act with impunity. Power attracts those whom would seek out power. Ask yourself what sorts of people seek our power, and towards what ends. Use history as your guide. What Greg has done is report news that the state controlled media has failed to report in their efforts to perpetuate the narrative of the powerful. The veil is being torn. It's a vital read.

My advice here would be not to waste your time with this particular poster.

Please list the benefits of going to war with another nuclear super power. The geo-political steps this Administration has taken in the wake of our election has been a strong rebuke, while at the same time an acknowledgement of the realities of the world, and our involvement in the affairs of other nations. I would ask you not to take personal anecdote and scale that upwards across entire organizations. People should not be trusting of power structures, especially those which have demonstrated an abject lack of accountability, and a willingness to insulate themselves from criticism; even more so those which innately manifest themselves with mechanisms which control the flow of information the populous receives, and are empowered to collect and warehouse massive amounts of information about individual citizens. The potential for malfeasance is vast, and the reality is that such fertile ground for corruption will always attract bad actors. Put another way: there were no gentle hearted plantation overseers. I implore you to read through the totality of the evidence that Greg (Deranged Rhino) has presented over the course of the last year plus. If you were to ask him, I'm almost positive he would direct you to a well sourced compendium he has created on this web forum. It's a vital read for anyone who considers themselves to be a concerned and responsible citizen.

All technologically advanced countries attempt to interfere in all other nation's elections. Going to war over this reality is absurd. Nations will always act in their own best interests, and the interconnectivity of the world has created massive pockets of overlap and interdependence. Add to that the fact that you're essentially requiring that the world be in a perpetual state of world war; and I reject your argument, as should you after some careful consideration of the realities your preferences would bring to the fore. As an aside, what are your thoughts on the Five Eyes nations conspiring with elements of our own government to fix our federal elections and then assist the losers of that election in a palace coup in order to cover up their crimes? Should we begin the carpet bombing of England, Australia, and Israel; plunging the world into the brutal darkness of nuclear war? Or should this sort of thing be handled on a diplomatic level in order to preserve peace, given the ramifications? Might it make more sense to dole out geo-political retribution, and divest ourselves of some of the interconnectivities of our global intelligence service in order to make this sort of thing harder to do going forward?

Did no one conceptualize that their might be some blow back from a maligned majority, using the same weapons they are being attacked with?

Never tried, or have bad aim?

Not the right thread for this.

This is an absolute **** show.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-26/ex-clinton-foundation-official-tied-chinese-kindergarten-embroiled-bizarre-sexual-ab

If you're looking for a thread about simple domestics I suggest the new Shady McCoy thread on the main board.

I could have sworn that I read somewhere that Real Madrid will be paying a portion of his annual salary with Juve. Can you confirm?

That's absolutely incredible.

Can you provide a link?

Rod Rosenstein