Rocky Landing

Really. "Off the top of your head?" Again, is there some inside info you are privy to? Or are you basing your opinion off the quarter of meaningless football vs. the Jets and maybe that article from over a year ago that cd1 posted as "proof" of Jones having no future potential? Off the top of your head... The certainty with which many of the posters in this thread have stated their opinions off the top of their heads, while offering no evidence whatsoever is bizarre. Off the top of your head has no credibility.

I have a very hard time believing that any team, including the Bills, is going to draft a QB prospect that not only has the off-field issues that CK has had, but has also had two ACL replacements, recent hernia surgery, and most recently surgery to an injured throwing hand that will keep him from even throwing a football until late July at the earliest. That being said, I hope we sign him as a UDFA, and stick him on the practice squad. Nothing to lose.

The pronouncements regarding Cardale on this forum are a bit crazy. When he was drafted last year, he was accurately described as an extremely raw prospect with high potential. Since then, no one outside of the Bills organization has seen enough of him to know how far he has progressed, or if he is on track to make a leap in 2017. This is a situation where we have to trust the FO, and coaching staff. They cut EJ. They didn't cut Cardale. I'm assuming that we start TC with four QBs, whether we pick one up in FA, or the draft. If Cardale makes it onto the 53, I will assume that McD, et al, still see potential, and we may have something special in Cardale Jones.

Clearly? 67 games isn't a large enough sample size to see that she is mediocre, at best?

One career interception in 67 games? He ain't no Stephon Gilmore.

That's the magic of motion picture.

I don't generally go out for the emoji thing, but

Nah, that's not trolling. It's just reaching. Really, really far reaching. But, if Taylor is a "bench dweller," then so are at least a third of the starting QBs in this league.

Blithe insults peppered into straw man arguments masquerading as debate, but designed to elicit an emotional response for your own gratification is, indeed, trolling.

Rolling blunts, and chatting up porn stars should make him an honorary Bill even if we don't sign him.

That's DOPE! (er.. I mean DOPEY)

Because Bucky Brooks said so???

Wasn't that Duke Williams?

See? He showed restraint! Sign him up and give him a football!

This is the problem that other posters have pointed out about you. You draw conclusions about other posters not based on what they say, but based on the argument you want to have. Be that as it may, regardless of how I, or anyone else may feel about TT (I'm fairly lukewarm on him, myself, but do feel that it was our best option to keep him), to equate him with Losman/Edwards/Manuel, and denigrate those who support him as the current starter is cheap trolling, and as I said, dumb.

Ahh, that would explain why he said AK-47, and not a Remington 11-87.

Yeah, I guess that's a thing... But, this was in Mississippi. If you ask someone from Mississippi if they're carrying a gun, they'll answer, "I've got my pants on, don't I?"

That's maybe the dumbest thing you've written.

In all honesty, I'm not sure why everyone is collectively clutching their pearls over Kelly's off-field issues. From what I understand, his big character issue is that he is a hothead. So what? None of his transgressions have been drug related. He has not been accused of alcoholism. To me, the biggest issues are the ACL replacements, which will keep him from being drafted. No team would draft a questionable rookie who can't attend training camp (except for the Bills, of course). Sign him as a UDFA and stick him on the PS. If he can handle it, great. If not, sayonara.

Sure. But, my point stands.

UDFA and stick him on the PS?

High risk/high reward vs. low risk/low reward. Do you think it is possible that TT would risk $10mil to be a starter? And, do you think it is possible that TT saw Buffalo as his best chance at being a starter?

Let's be clear about what I said. I was responding to your assertion that, "It is beyond me that anyone can honestly say EJ is better than TJ. EJ is an automatic loss if he starts." Did I say EJ was a good QB? NO. Do I think TJ is a good QB? NO. Do I think one is better than the other? I don't really know the answer to that question. But, I do know this: TJ Yeats' stats suck donkey balls. And, if somebody drew the conclusion that EJ > TJ, I can certainly understand why, and I don't understand how that would be "beyond you." His numbers are better, period. If somebody thinks that TJ > EJ, I'd love to know the rationale, and "EJ is just a bad QB" doesn't cut it.

Remember when Kujo was called "Venus De Milo" by the O-line coach during his rookie season?