Rocky Landing

He said that? Who was he talking to? This all makes perfect sense if you could just understand that a fact is just another opinion.

Just for clarity in going forward with this battle between who can best make their fourteen second google search sound like their own thoughts, versus the I'm-more-open-minded-than-you folks, it should be noted that the Flat Earth Truthers believe that the flat world is ringed by what the Global Satanist World Dominators deceptively refer to as "Antarctica." See map below:

Is there anyone who wants Taylor as their first choice? It strikes me that the Tyrod Taylor debate is essentially between those who utterly despise him, and inflate their opinions with cherry-picked data, meaningless invective, outright lunacy, and (as I believe is your case) straw-man arguments versus those who view him as somewhere around average, with clear downsides, and upsides, but not the worst option we have. At this point, I don't even think Transplantbillsfan has TT as his first choice.

I would hope they still make Gaines an offer. I'd rather have Gaines than Johnson, or Wright. Can Gaines pay nickel?

Written without a shred of irony...

This is amazing. We're just making excuses for Taylor in that first half. In which he didn't play. And Peterman played historically bad football.

Yeah, that's not the first time Mills has sucked. If you're suggesting that Mills, or any other player, intentionally threw the first half of that game because of loyalty to Tyrod, or some other similar conspiracy theory, you're as high as xRushx. The Bills were a rudderless ship with Peterman at the helm. I'm sure, from your other posts, that you'd love to put that on Tyrod (or McD, or the entire rest of the team, perhaps). I don't. I put it on Peterman. They looked like a different team in the second half.

You are high.

I'm nonplussed.

There's this thing called, "the scientific method," and this other thing called, "peer review."

Which crappy guard?

Better than Peterman.

I would agree that it is more likely that Peterman is on the Roster, come September, than Taylor. But, it seems more likely that if Peterman were on the roster, it would be as third string, a role that Taylor's contract precludes.

In the second half of that game (which I attended), the coaching staff made the change back to Taylor. That wasn't serendipity either. It was based on Peterman's performance. When Taylor played that second half, against the same defense playing at the same intensity, the difference was remarkable. The Bills looked like two deferent teams. The Bills are not going to cut Taylor because they have Peterman on the roster. Peterman is not a viable starting QB.

But, will it land on its feet?

Plate of shrimp.

Easy, now. I chose my words carefully. I didn't call you a moron, or dumb, or as sharp as a bag of wet mice, or anything like that. I called your post dumb-- the dumbest in a really dumb thread. And it was. Although, you may have outdone yourself with this last one. Honestly, what else could I call your assertion that your opinion that, "most NFL players are just slightly smarter than a rock," (your words) is "100% fact?" It numbs the mind! I'm pretty sure I haven't violated the TOS. If we weren't allowed to call out posts we thought were dumb, there'd be a whole lot of empty space on this site.

Well, to be fair, you kinda brought it upon yourself. You managed to submit the absolute dumbest post in an exceedingly dumb thread. Personally, I say BRAVO!

Really????? I know Peterman didn't look terrible battling the snow when the Colts came. But, sheesh, he looked terrible in LA! And, Taylor played the second half and the difference was stark! Does anyone think that some team would offer us a trade for Peterman?

Well, one thing this $6mil bonus signals, for those who think Peterman is a better option than Tyrod, is that McD, et al, do not.

Is this really such a simple question?????

Then, I assume, it doesn't phase you in the slightest when someone kneels during the anthem, if standing is meaningless?

You added the word "political." But, of course standing for the National Anthem is a statement. Otherwise, what's the point? And, why would anyone care when someone didn't? If kneeling is a statement, then so is standing. Unless, of course, we, or the players are forced to stand. Then, it becomes meaningless. Also, if posters on this board needed excuses to voice their opinions, you'd better have a whole lot of them!

Yes, seriously. We all make a statement when we stand for the National Anthem. Does that not fit your narrative?