Rocky Landing

But, not as close by the end of the day, eh? I don't think Allen starting vs, the Jags is a certainty at all. I believe they will be evaluating both QBs throughout the bye. If the question comes down to who gives them the best chance to win, the answer would probably be Barkley. Why would we assume that McD doesn't want to win games? Sure, Allen's development is important. The argument has also frequently been made that it would be better for his development for him to sit for a season. Starting Barkley vs. the Jags is not a difficult decision to make.

If he can play this consistently, he should be part of the equation. Our utterly pedestrian WR corp looks better today under Barkley. If they can improve, then Allen will have a much quicker learning curve working with a better developed squad once he does get on the field, whether it's this season, or the next.

Wow. Sirles isn't good.

Is it me, or do Jets fans boo their own team a lot more than other fan bases?

If Barkley can win us some games, and develop our passing game in the process, he should stay on the field.

Not sure I want to see Allen back too soon. How many throws has Barkley made today that Peterman simply can't make?

Love this McKensie

And yet, here we are...

I really hope they don't take their foot off the gas.

Shame on McD for giving Peterman opportunity, after opportunity, after opportunity.

Do the T-shirts come with a paper bag?

Bet the under on this game...

Build a winning culture. That's the hard part.

Or in a Bills jersey.

Three touchdown passes, and 12 interceptions. Nearly 10% of his passes have been interceptions. Imagine what Sunday vs. the Bears would have looked like had Khalil Mack been on the field? There has never been a Buffalo QB more painful to watch than Late Nate Peterman. Bring back Brian Brohm for God's sake. Or that goofball kid who was stocking the fridge for 'Tuh'-rod and Baker Mayfield on Hard Knocks. Bring back EJ Manuel and let C.Biscuit tell us all, "I told you so..." ANYTHING is better than this!

0-0 in OT

I hope we see some short screens to Ivory, and that sort of thing. Nate does have some abilities-- they're just limited, and everyone knows what they are. And, obviously, they know his weaknesses, as well. I'll guess the bears D will be baiting Nate to throw long-- especially with Khalil Mack out. They'll try to shut the the short-passing game down, and stack the box against the run. They'll keep their secondary three steps away from any receiver running downfield, and keep their eyes on Nate. Our receivers are almost as bad as the guy throwing the ball, so they will be itching for a jump-ball opportunity. I wonder what the over/under is for Peterman interceptions?

Elbow injuries do tend to linger.

Still the best way I have found to get my family to leave me the hell alone for three hours on a Sunday.

Oh my ever loving God,... somebody is still arguing to allow Peterman back on the field???

Hmm... Peterman, and Ducasse both have similar sores on their lips...

Once again, Nathan Peterman is one injury away from seeing the field.

I can't believe I'm in the position of hoping that Derek Anderson starts.

The Texans are playing in Jacksonville next week. Let's hope they're looking ahead like the Vikes probably were.

With the pass rush Allen is going to face, and the weakness of our O-line, Allen should get the ball out of his hands fast. He's not going to get a lot of time to go through reads. I'm expecting a lot of designed short yardage throws to Shady, and Ray Ray. I hope they get Ivory in the passing game, as well. I'm sure not expecting a lot of production out of KB, unless our O-line really surprises and affords Allen more time in the pocket than would be expected. It sure would be nice to see Foster get open downfield, Allen not under throw him, and actually catch the ball. That would be fun to see. Likely? Probably not...