WorldTraveller
-
Posts
1,037 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by WorldTraveller
-
-
Nothing to see here from the "leaders" of the obama media
Washington Post headline:
Democrats restore to party platform language on Jerusalem After GOP Criticism
New York Times headline:
Democrats, Pushed by Obama, Alter Platform Over Jerusalem
Msnbc hadn't mentioned the controversy once through out the day.
-
She's not a natural speaker. I guess that leaves good ol bill to salvage the day. Which I'm sure he will do real well
-
The contraceptive queen just bombed
-
We were all young once. I was making a joke.
I didn't take it as malice, I was just commenting.
-
Have you considered the possibility that your former heavy use of psychedelics might be causal?
I've always valued personal responsibility, which is why I'm a fiscal conservative, well before I ventured into the land of psychedelics.
-
-
-
The next time you want me check your work NJSue, you could check it yourself first.
Is that the best you can come up with?
-
It is a fundamental aspect to consider. But, it's also a sticky wicket. For people who don't believe in the existence of God it's tomato/tomatoe for if there is no God then how could he give anyone rights or take them away?
This doesn't invite God into legislation. At all. Any attempt to misconstrue the words or meanings to say so is misrepresenting historical fact and the founding father's own words.
The document you're citing actually prohibits it and the designers of it were a hodgepodge of Christians, Agnostics and Diests. They didn't agree on God's role in man's life but they were smart enough to realize inviting it into politics was a mistake. Which is why they created a wall between the state and religion.
Belief in God is great. Governing by the word of "God" is the first step to tyranny and not at all what the Founding Fathers wanted.
I don't believe anyone was suggesting that they "invite god into legislation", but I mean, what about at least a little shoutout. Like, yo god, What up?
Couldn't there at least of been that?
-
My how times have changed, it wasn't all that long ago where I'd use to eat mushrooms and hang with my circle of friends, now I record political speeches and catch them when I get home off of work.
-
Funny, one of the two parties basically keeps the same party platform that it has for decades, the other omits and changes certain aspects of theirs, yet the media narrative is that the one who has kept in place the same platform for decades, is the party who has moved further to the extremes.
-
I saw a comment below on an abcnews website that I thought was funny
If I dropped ‘God’ from my party platform, I’d be worried about getting struck by lightning too. -
-
Was reading earlier the Dems are unable to get balloons in time to drop tomorrow night and are trying to come up with something special...which led to the discussion of Sandra Fluke giving up all her free condoms to be used as balloons.
-
Seriously, you're acting like a retard.
-
-
You're right, soccers not really a sport.
And you're an idiot
-
Liberals watch sports like soccer, where they can fall down and claim someone hurt them, then to actually get hit.
Ok, that was just retarded
-
It's quite amazing that the viewership from the Conventions from both Democrats and Republicans have plummetted the way they have.
People are really turned off, I'm guessing that overall voter turnout will be way down, which I believe favors the R's
-
I agree, that he HAS to win Florida, without it he has no shot. The point that I'm clearly making is that it's a very close race, and that momentum is on his side. It's not based on a feeling or a hunch, but actual polling data. An objective observer factors in momentum in EVERY single National Polling AND battle ground polling, factors in structural resource advantages heading into the final two months that will play a huge role, factors in historic data that shows that undecided voters tend to break away from the incumbent, factors in that the economy is the number concern of the US electorate and all polling is showing Romney in the lead in this area.
Two to three months ago, Obama was feeling a lot better about his possiblities than he does today, and if I was in Romney's camp, I would realize that this is the best position that they've been in since the two man race had begun. Those are facts.
-
We were discussing the map's toss-up states. Try to keep up.
Your campaign of optimism for Romney's chances is so objective.
If you consider my "objectivity" based on polling data you are correct, whereas you on the otherhand go purely based on empty declaratives and your gut feeling.
RCP has it at exactly EVEN
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
46.8 to 46. 8
The main four battle grounds
Ohio +.7 for O
http://www.realclear...obama-1860.html
Virginia + .6 for O
http://www.realclear...obama-1774.html
Florida +.6 for O
http://www.realclear...obama-1883.html
N.C +2 for Romney
http://www.realclear...obama-1784.html
Half the polls in these polls listed show Romney in the lead and half for O
And they have all been moving decisively for Romney over the past two weeks.
I've called you out on your bull **** on a few occassions, and all you ever come back with are your meaningless declaratives that carry no weight.
Now if you don't have any facts or data to back up your tired bull **** then I would suggest that you stop further embarrasing yourself.
Put up or shut up.
-
Michigan I believe is a slight tossup for Obama, PA looking out of reach.
However, last two polls in Ohio showing the lead for Romney, there was one released yesterday showing a + 3 for Romney.
http://www.realclear...obama-1860.html
Also JA, I find it odd, that in that retarded Map that Billsfanforever posted, that Michigan stood out to you,
even though it listed Missouri, Arizona, NorthCarolina and ALASKA in Obama's column.
Geez
It's trending towards him and he's still got over 2 months. He has the money to spend, there are more bad economic reports to follow, and then there are the debates.
He doesn't consider facts, he goes by his gut. That's just how he rolls
-
I think Clinton is more interested in coming off as effective than anything else
-
I thought his wife was fairly milfy, and no not his mom or little girl, dumb ass. But there was another looked of age at the other end looked solid. Maybe his sister ?
Hey, what about Derek jeter. Is he kinda hot this year?
Live Feed DNC
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Long as hell. Shades of 88