Jump to content

peterpan

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,992
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by peterpan

  1. It's gonna be a home game for the Bills, I think they win it by picking off Bottles 2 or 3 times. Assuming McCoy is able to play some role.
  2. Last night the tickets were $85 this morning they are $250. I'd say lots of bills fans are going!!
  3. It should be an incomplete pass because he didn't complete the catch to the ground..... According to NoSaint
  4. If you don't already know it's rigged, you never will....
  5. The player doesn't have to maintain control to the ground****when he has established himself as a runner already*****. As stated in the rules I posted above.
  6. I don't know how you can say that. I just posted the rule that states otherwise....?
  7. I just looked up the NFL rulebook to see if they changed it and removed the "football move-" aspect. They didn't, here it is. https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-video-rulebook/completing-a-catch/ Here is the Important part.." A player has the ball long enough to become a runner when, after his second foot is on the ground, he is capable of avoiding or warding off impending contact of an opponent, tucking the ball away, turning up field, or taking additional steps " The Steelers player both tucked the ball away, into his stomach, then turned up field, AND extended the ball over the goaline. By the rule, clearly stated above, he had completed the catch before the ball crossed the plane of the goal line. TOUCHDOWN!! Furthermore, here is another part of the rule everyone seams to overlook..."Item 4. Ball Touches Ground. If the ball touches the ground after the player secures control of it, it is a catch, provided that the player continues to maintain control." You see, the ball CAN touch the ground AND still be a catch. While obviously much more subjective, I would have to say the Pitt player did maintain control of the ball well enough to STILL be a catch. That means the NFL overlooked three separate and specific rules in order to overturn that call. The third being that replay requires indisputable evidence.....
  8. Ok, maybe they just want to save there multiple Billion dollar investments??? That should surely make sense to the resident Patriot ball washer.
  9. Maybe they were/are blindly thinking it's fair, and couldn't possibly be corrupted.....
  10. What happened in the pats chargers game??? Like I said I don't follow them closely (and even still I've found 3 games they "won" when they didn't)
  11. Like I said what if its only one guy? What if the Riveron guy is on Krafts payroll? He gets 20 grand a week and makes 1 or 2 calls go the way the Pats want them to go. Or maybe the Mafia is paying him to make sure certain teams win and the Mob rigs the betting? Also, Whats the average margin of victory in the NFL?? Its less than 4 points. Maybe less than 3. One TD awarded or called back is all it takes. Look at the Pats this year alone, these all happened in the last 2 mins of the games......Houston - Pats WR ball hits the ground, should be no catch, but awarded a catch anyways. They win. Jets guy scores touch down, then they claim he fumbled... huh??? Pats win. Steelers, guy catches ball, extends ball over the plane, TD....called back, Pats win. All of those were obviously and suspiciously the wrong call. Pats*** should have had the same 8-6 record as the bills going into the bills game, but instead they have Home Field advantage in the playoffs, because of 3 replay reviews. THREE PLAYS IS THE DIFFERENCE!!!! In the Bills game, the refs spotted them a FG with a terrible PI call, a second FG with that 4th down conversions where he was stopped short, and the Benjamin TD. Thats a 10 point swing, and the Bills gave up after that. Shoulda been 20-10 Bills, but was 16-16. How many other games were the Pats*** awarded points, or points taken from the other team, by obvious bad calls???? I dont know as I dont watch them every week, but my guess is there is more evidence against them. Your argument that the refs dont have that kind of control over the games is laughable.
  12. Well, it could be a "lone wolf" scenario, or a handful of them. Taking checks from Kraft, or from the mob, for betting purposes. I don't see how that isn't believable. The NBA officials were throwing games a few years ago..... Or it could be from the league, pushing the big market teams, the storylines, making sure the Marquee players make the playoffs, all that jazz. Someone can check my posts, and put it here, but I stated last year that the Rams would magically turn into one of the NFLs best teams now that they moved to LA and would need to sell PSLs for their new pricey stadium. Bam- now they are good...
  13. More evidence that it's rigged IMO. The centralized replay office was a good idea I thought, now it's evident that it's simply easier for the league to rig games. Sad day for football.
  14. More evidence the fix was in!! Sorry but you are incorrect, that's not the rules. I would have been fine with a no first down for the bills, as it wasn't a first down. I know the rules, and that's that.
  15. You can't say that. It was 13-13 at half but should have been 20-10. Then the Pats first drive of the 2nd they are awarded a first down after being stopped on 4th. It would have been 23-10 at that point, bills ball at the 40, and it's a COMPLETELY different game.......
  16. Idk, the whole cheating thing will always be over his head. They were caught cheating in 4 of their 5 super bowl years. And truthfully I believe they do a lot more, and haven't been caught. Like how is Tom Brady playing at 40? And why does he have his own personal team-ish trainer? That's always been weird. Now that trainer is banned from the stadium and sideline email and team.plane....? Isn't it wierd that for 20 years teams have complained about their radio communications being screwy when playing the pats and the in the SB they are getting creamed by the Falcons...Only to have Matt Ryan's headset malfunction and then they launch a massive comeback???? It's weird they ALWAYS start the season like 2-2, the. Go on to finish 12-3. It's like it takes them 4-5 weeks to build up enough cheating material on each team for that year.
  17. I guess that WAS Marrones Defense, not Scwartz lol!
  18. 8-6 actually. The Jets were robbed of a potential game winning TD on a fumble that wasn't. Bills should be playing for the division title next week, but the NFL won't allow that to happen . By Mike pereiras reasoning it's impossible for a wr to fumble because he doesn't complete the catch until he is tackled. The Steele's dude completed the process of the catch when he turned to reach the ball over the plan.
  19. Again the ball can hit the ground and move and still be a catch. The WR must lose possession, as determined by the refs. Your reasoning is flawed. The ball hitting the ground and moving is irrelevant. Did he lose possession? That entire question is irrelevant. Hadhe completed the catch as soon as he reached.over the goaline.
  20. Your understanding of the rule is wrong dude. When you make a football move-, you have completed the catch. By bringing the ball into his chest, then turning up field, has completed the catch. Done.
  21. No, that's the not rule, or what happened. The ball can touch the ground, and it can still be a catch. Besides, he made a football move- reaching out over the goaline, making it a catch. 100%
  22. He caught it, brought it into his body, knee hit, then extended the ball over the goal line. Definite football move makes it a catch. 100%. only explanation is the refs rigged it for the Pats. Why does the NFL cheat for the pats I will never understand!!!! It's SO OBVIOUS how to beat the pats, I say it every time, tight man coverage and double gronk when he is flexed out. It's so easy.
  23. KC guy is possible with that trade
  24. That looks like a bunch of white broncos following one cop car. Ironic or is this some kinda political statement....?
×
×
  • Create New...